Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Mothercare reborn and maybe worth a punt now (MTC)     

ainsoph - 10 Feb 2003 09:04

I have been in and out of these a few times :-)) ..... bumping around their bottom but starting to bounce a little ..... closed @ 87/90p on Friday.

They have fallen from grace because of poor distribution probelens caused by poor management and an out of House warehousing system. THis is being sorted and new guys have replaced the old .....

Great brand name and selling could be overdone ..... anyway I am in for a few @ 90p and will let them ride for a while - not a t trade. Recent director buying around this price


ains


bought @ 90p - currently moving up at 141/145p 13/05 = plus 56.66% net


Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=MTC&Si

cynic - 20 Jan 2014 10:44 - 304 of 454

would be quite nice to have a GOOG and even AAPL and other US stock threads, but it's a pain as i don't think one can post charts .... or are you clever enough to do that, for i'm certainly not?

Shortie - 20 Jan 2014 11:06 - 305 of 454

Should be able to figure out the charts, I was thinking about creating a shorters thread also.

cynic - 20 Jan 2014 11:10 - 306 of 454

that would certainly be interesting
GF's chart thread is pretty good, but the picks get quickly swamped

Shortie - 20 Jan 2014 11:30 - 307 of 454

I follow GF's chart thread also, scanning for breakout patterns can mean things become a little erratic on a daily basis as often you'll need a day or two extra to confirm a movement. I tend to look for companies that are overvalued (for no other reason than there are plenty of people doing the opposite, shares mag, RHPS etc. etc all helping to over-inflate prices). I then watch these companies and wait for them to breakout. I don't bother with analyst numbers as these are always behind the fall.

jimmy b - 20 Jan 2014 13:35 - 308 of 454

A short thread would be good Shortie .

cynic - 20 Jan 2014 13:37 - 309 of 454

jimmy - what a chuckle you are :-) ....... you were castigating me earlier when i set out why i was not keen on BLUR

jimmy b - 20 Jan 2014 13:40 - 310 of 454

Why am i a chuckle ,i don't care about BLUR i care about you having a dig at random posters, i just like to read the threads without that nonsense . Whats wrong with me saying a short thread would be good .

cynic - 20 Jan 2014 13:54 - 311 of 454

you're a sensitive little soul too aren't you

if you had bothered to read more thoroughly, which clearly you did not, you might have understood why i posted as i did to DC .... if you had followed other threads of his - eg WAND - you will have seen that i actively supported him

have i had much handbagging with tomasz?
damn right, and for good reason, as shortie would attest in his own right

i'm more than happy to take criticism when it is warranted, but on this occasion it patently was not!

Shortie - 20 Jan 2014 14:30 - 312 of 454

Jimmy, I'll second the tomasz statement, I've squelched him... Have a read back of the ACS thread and you'll see why.

jimmy b - 20 Jan 2014 14:33 - 313 of 454

Ok i think you got in late on WAND late and was probably pissed your down but not to worry, all i'm saying is please don't constantly argue on threads people want to read ,it's not just me that's mentioned it .Leave it at that.

jimmy b - 20 Jan 2014 14:34 - 314 of 454

Shortie i agree he's been a pain to you both ,it's just i like to scroll through the threads and i do read some peoples opinions ,have done for years .

PS as i said i would like to see a short thread..

Chris Carson - 20 Jan 2014 16:07 - 315 of 454

cynic - Big difference between tomasz and DC, apart from the standard of English. The snipe you had at DC on the BLUR thread was unwarranted imo. Your response no doubt will be 'I don't give a jot" which is fine.

galatica - 20 Jan 2014 16:11 - 316 of 454

i've started so i'll finish

Shortie, looks like you are getting married to the wrong partner
it never works when someone only takes, takes and damned takes.


partnership agreement
sign here if you dare

Shortie - 20 Jan 2014 16:37 - 317 of 454

Thanks for the concern, anything posted here I do freely for all to take if they so wish..

skinny - 20 Jan 2014 16:40 - 318 of 454

Which gap first?

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=MTC&Si

cynic - 20 Jan 2014 17:47 - 319 of 454

chris - i had no intent of being harsh with DC at all and i'm sorry if that is the way it read ..... it was meant as no more than a caveat given some of the barbs that had been directed at him in recent days by others

jimmy - i don't know whence you got the idea that i was sore to have bought WAND late in the day and am thus currently showing a loss, though hardly a very painful one

Chris Carson - 20 Jan 2014 17:56 - 320 of 454

Thanks cynic, understood and appreciate your response.

cynic - 20 Jan 2014 17:57 - 321 of 454

no prob

jimmy b - 20 Jan 2014 18:32 - 322 of 454

Folk who know me would really laugh if they read your comment " your a sensitive little soul" iv'e never been called that ,would be good if i was ! :))

skinny - 20 Jan 2014 19:58 - 323 of 454

Erm - I thought this was a share orientated thread - obviously another one that bites the dust!
Register now or login to post to this thread.