Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

STERLING ENERGY big buyers about... (SEY)     

proptrade - 14 Jun 2004 11:58

anyone got any ideas about the block trades that went through today?

website: http://www.sterlingenergyplc.com/

graph.php?movingAverageString=%2C50%2C20

weather: www.nhc.noaa.gov/refresh/graphics_at4+shtml/084938.shtml?50wind120

gavdfc - 24 Jan 2005 15:19 - 3078 of 7811

Lol! Maybe I'll have a Del Boy special then, Malibu and Lucozade with a cherry on top and a half ring of pineapple, umbrella and drink through a straw!

proptrade - 24 Jan 2005 15:38 - 3079 of 7811

hey, don't knock the classics!

as this is the most depressing day of the year, i intend to go home, put on the flip flops and swimming shorts and pour myself some outrageous cocktail and watch the holiday channel. the sun always shines on TV. a-ha!

Fundamentalist - 24 Jan 2005 17:03 - 3080 of 7811

Sterling Energy PLC
24 January 2005


Sterling Energy PLC (the 'Company')



Holding in Company





The Company was informed on 24 January 2005 by The Moore Credit Fund (Master),
L.O. that, as of 20 January 2005, it was interested in 42,600,000 ordinary
shares of 1p each in the Company, representing 3.06 per cent. of the issued
share capital of the Company.



24 January 2005



seawallwalker - 24 Jan 2005 17:05 - 3081 of 7811

Ha!

The phantom buyer.................

This will start to move now bit by bit and up at that.

Remember you chartists, the line can break up as well as down in the absecnce of any news.

Well, this one broke upwards.

We are all learning aren't we?

gavdfc - 24 Jan 2005 19:27 - 3082 of 7811

Nice RNS. A few more of these would help the cause, as would some drilling reports over the coming months.

Time for a drink I think.

Hectorp - 24 Jan 2005 19:40 - 3083 of 7811

We'll get Chinguetti update soon... as you'll know they only mention weekly Tiof developments. But as we've had activity on Ching for a month now and no news, it also means that there is no bad news!
Share price strengthening nicely on strong volume.

hilary - 24 Jan 2005 19:42 - 3084 of 7811

They've dumped .5m since 3/12 when they owned 43.1m or 3.09%...... not bought!! There was no need for any rns, imo, as their holding did not pass through a full percentage point.

gavdfc - 24 Jan 2005 20:01 - 3085 of 7811

Seems to be a bit of confusion here. The RNS today states:

"24 January 2005 by The Moore Credit Fund (Master),
L.O. that, as of 20 January 2005, it was interested in 42,600,000 ordinary
shares of 1p each in the Company, representing 3.06 per cent."

And from the RNS of 3/12/04 mentioned in Hilary's post:

"The Company was informed on 2 December 2004 by The Moore Macro Fund L.P. that as
of 22 November 2004 it was interested in 43,100,000 ordinary shares of 1p each
in the Company, representing 3.09 per cent."

So we have the Moore Credit Fund (Master) L.O. and The Moore Macro Fund L.P.

hilary - 24 Jan 2005 20:52 - 3086 of 7811

Looks to me like the same wolf, gavdfc, just different sheep.

seawallwalker - 24 Jan 2005 21:15 - 3087 of 7811

I think:-

Same wolf but different fund.

That is why there was an RNS.

They have to declare over 3%.

So they have over 6% now.....................

Candles apparently confirm that this is a break away. (From advfn).

Tea leaves are not quite so clear on the issue but I should have emptied the cup of all liquid first.


I am amazed at how little people really know about this, and I include me in that.

Lots of guesswork but no real knowledge.

I am asking elsewhere too so hopefully we will get an answer.

May be a load of tosh to some but we may as well have an answer to this.

hilary - 25 Jan 2005 09:02 - 3088 of 7811

Interesting idea to get someone from Moores on here, seawallwalker. Maybe Louis Bacon himself will turn up.

:o)

I'm also intrigued by the break away chart pattern. How do they work exactly? Are they anything to do with short holidays or chocolate bars?

biscuit_breakaway.jpg

On a serious note, I think that you're being a bit premature in calling a head and shoulders chart patterm just yet. Certainly not until the right shoulder is in place (around 17p or 17.5p) and the price action is actually moving down towards the neckline (14.5p or thereabouts) again. Confirmation comes with a move down through the neckline. Incidentally, why are you getting so excited about a possible H & S? That's a bearish chart pattern. Aren't you meant to be a Permabull?

seawallwalker - 25 Jan 2005 09:11 - 3089 of 7811

You got excited hilary so why can't anyone else?

Reserved to you is it?

Personally I rely more on tea leaves and the stars.

Probably more accurate.

You just can't help yourself can you?

Say Moo!

hilary - 25 Jan 2005 09:18 - 3090 of 7811

"Personally I rely more on tea leaves and the stars."

Now there's a surprise. May I take it that we won't be getting an answer as to what a break away chart pattern is then?

StarFrog - 25 Jan 2005 09:45 - 3091 of 7811

Er, isn't it Tuesday?

goal - 25 Jan 2005 09:58 - 3092 of 7811

Its gone above the resistance line 17p & now becomes the support line.

proptrade - 25 Jan 2005 10:04 - 3093 of 7811

its BANTER day!

Hils, welcome back to you! for the record any change in shareholding by any holder of 3% or more must be reported (even if a single share is bought or sold whilst over 3%).

Rgds
PT

hilary - 25 Jan 2005 10:14 - 3094 of 7811

Sorry, proptrade, but that's not strictly true.

Holdings which pass either way through the 3% level need to be reported, together with subsequent changes which pass either way through higher levels at increments of 1%. For example a holding which changed from 3.01% to 3.99% would not need to be reported, but a holding which changed from 3.99% to 4.01% (or vice versa) would need to be reported.

proptrade - 25 Jan 2005 10:23 - 3095 of 7811

fair enough, i took my stock exchange exams in london, singapore and indonesia and may have mixed one or two or the rules up!

anyway since this is not life threatening i will give you the benefit of the doubt. i can't be bothered to reread the Companies Act 1985!

Fundamentalist - 25 Jan 2005 10:29 - 3096 of 7811

Prop

hils is correct - it is when the holding passes through a whole % point either way

OT - any of you guys invested in DNX - another nice deal confirmed this am and more to come - even hils would like the chart on this one

hilary - 25 Jan 2005 10:34 - 3097 of 7811

That's good ....... I knew you'd see the light.

:o)

So do you think that Louis Bacon will continue selling till he's cleared out his holding? Or do you think that he's actually doubled it to over 6% as suggested by seawallwalker? Or do you think that he won't do anything at all?
Register now or login to post to this thread.