kate bates
- 02 Apr 2009 13:29
Don't like doing threads but have been alerted to this one as it trades well below cash position and allegedly has directorate links with the massive Petrobas. Last broker target was something like 165p - currently 26! The bates is in.
mitzy
- 10 Jan 2011 13:16
- 324 of 474
Thanks for that Bb.
hlyeo98
- 10 Jan 2011 14:02
- 325 of 474
CHAR will always trumph.
mitzy
- 12 Jan 2011 08:13
- 326 of 474
Buy buy buy......
mitzy
- 12 Jan 2011 13:13
- 327 of 474
Surprised there is no interest in this one..
my price target is 330p end 2011.
cynic
- 12 Jan 2011 13:39
- 328 of 474
because at least for now, it's all hype and little or no substance
mitzy
- 12 Jan 2011 13:42
- 329 of 474
With respect you said that 18 months ago at 25p....
cynic
- 12 Jan 2011 13:43
- 330 of 474
i'm sure i did, and it still holds true ..... and if i had bought any, i'ld sure as hell have banked some profits, which i assume you have not
i actually looked back to 2009 - have a look at the chart while you're about it - 150+ down to about 30; true it has now got up to 230 or whatever, but for what good reason? ..... at least XEL has some logic and ditto RKH
mitzy
- 12 Jan 2011 13:47
- 331 of 474
You know me cynic ..lol.
hlyeo98
- 12 Jan 2011 14:16
- 332 of 474
The only way is UP for CHAR, baby.
cynic
- 12 Jan 2011 14:25
- 333 of 474
why?
mitzy
- 12 Jan 2011 14:50
- 334 of 474
yo hlyeo...
hlyeo98
- 12 Jan 2011 15:17
- 335 of 474
Because it is the Shares mag this week. Favourable comment.
mitzy
- 12 Jan 2011 15:21
- 336 of 474
Yes thats correct.
Balerboy
- 13 Jan 2011 07:43
- 337 of 474
3 billion oil..... bugger me!!!
cynic
- 13 Jan 2011 08:00
- 338 of 474
i know i'm incredibly thick, but having just opened this week's issue on line, i see no mention of CHAR whatsoever
anyway, the market certainly believes some story
Balerboy
- 13 Jan 2011 08:08
- 339 of 474
9.2 bn in total for char.....how did i miss that one??? well done mitzy.,.
cynic
- 13 Jan 2011 08:12
- 340 of 474
estimate of gross unrisked mean prospective resources ...... what does that actually mean in terms of likely recoverable, always assuming the "prospective" evolves into some kind of actuality - which of course DES's did not
hlyeo98
- 13 Jan 2011 08:20
- 341 of 474
It's not Believe, it's the truth.
cynic
- 13 Jan 2011 08:21
- 342 of 474
it seems that i MAY have been wrong with my scepticism about CHAR, though time will tell if they truly have got something worthwhile on their books ..... accordingly, i have allowed myself to be suckered in with a modest number (50%), so i shall now wait and watch
at least i already banked a modest profit on these on the opposite tack!
mitzy
- 13 Jan 2011 08:22
- 343 of 474
I told you to buy yesterday.