ssanebs
- 04 Aug 2004 18:25
- 387 of 706
There will be an update in shares mag tomorrow, at this price the shares are not worth selling, i will still hold
astonvilla
- 04 Aug 2004 20:30
- 388 of 706
yeah why sell at this price...........were already lost....if you were going to sell it would have been in the 2.5p range. I am still (quitely) confident that with some positive news and more info about existing contract wins and Baltimore claim that we will recover to the 3p range.........interesting to see what Shares mag says tomorrow......surely the management must be alarmed at the price dive and will issue an RNS to quell investors fears.....will they????
apple
- 05 Aug 2004 00:33
- 389 of 706
Here is what you've been waiting for from Shares Mag
The company alleges a 22 million shares bear position has been built up via contracts for difference.
Nerve-wracking, but we will HOLD for now.
drunker50
- 05 Aug 2004 10:50
- 390 of 706
do any1 now what the stance is this week from tf
apple
- 05 Aug 2004 11:21
- 391 of 706
drunker50
See above.
Paulvoigt
- 05 Aug 2004 11:56
- 392 of 706
CFD's for EPO!!! my understanding was CFD's were limited to the major stocks not minows like EPO, can any one shed any light?
apple
- 05 Aug 2004 12:33
- 393 of 706
There is some buying again.
The price is up 20% since the low point of 1.25p on Tuesday.
WHY???????????
In hindsight, I wish that I had kept more of them, I didn't have many left by last week but it seems that I picked the low point to sell a few more.
Tradx
- 05 Aug 2004 15:01
- 394 of 706
apple,
In hindsight, you will be delighted that you sold.
This is still in a downwards trend, without news this will be sub-1p, it's just a question of when, not if.
Next week, it will be reported that the 22 million CFD short is now 50 million cfd short. LOL!!
regards
T...
toldmeso
- 07 Aug 2004 16:58
- 395 of 706
Tradx, yes very funny :)
Tradx are you the Tradx666 poster on advfn ? If not plse ignore the post below
If so maybe you help me.
I have done a bit of digging into the Netteller model via their prospectus and as you appear to know something about them can you answer these please:
-Is current revenues mostly US based
-If the US decided to stop NLR taking monies from the US there revenue would be almost ziltch.
-If the US decided to regulate gaming, then again Netteller would be no use to people as they could use their cards as normal.
I understand they are moving into Europe to hedge their exposure from the US. Do they have banks linked to their product apart from the US ? If so how many ?
To me Netteller do look risky because a large proportion of their revenue is US based.
toldmeso
- 07 Aug 2004 16:59
- 396 of 706
Paulvoigt, if your an experienced/professional investor/trader you can do anything you like with any broker if you have money.
Fred1new
- 07 Aug 2004 19:21
- 397 of 706
I wonder if there is a shorting on this share. Are any of the contributors to this thread doing so.
If there are I think I can guess who!!!
Tradx
- 09 Aug 2004 13:20
- 398 of 706
toldmeso,
Yes, and I have answered all your questions on the BLM board over there, but I'm happy to copy the post to here if you want..?
If you think my stance on epo is now negative because I hold NLR than you are seriously mistaken..as I said previously, orginally when I started researching epo I was very positive, and then all you have to do is read this thread and Tim's comments (and of course others..)..
Keep smiling.
Tradx
- 10 Aug 2004 10:40
- 399 of 706
oneill,
In fairness to Tim, he has to call it as he hears it and sees it, his view was hold for a week..etc as for the 22 million CFD position, if true, then the only thing that matters is that the lack of news from the company will have created the conditions which would make this possible. I too am surprised at Tim, especially after the deals he reffered to here, but you can only guess that his info is better than most and he is still confident that they are going to happen.
Over on the adfvn, one poster (you know the one) reckons that the COO resigned around a month ago, could this be the reason for the run down?
Be lucky.
Cor™
- 10 Aug 2004 11:02
- 400 of 706
Hi Tradx666, is advfn down at the moment or is it just me?
Tradx
- 10 Aug 2004 11:26
- 401 of 706
Cor,
It's definitly down - again!!
regards
T..
Cor™
- 10 Aug 2004 11:27
- 402 of 706
Paulvoigt - 05 Aug'04 - 11:56 - 444 of 453
CFD's for EPO!!! my understanding was CFD's were limited to the major stocks not minows like EPO, can any one shed any light?
Take a look at IND (Cap. < 5m) with an anonymous CFD position so large that the CFD company (UBS) had to issue an RNS!
They actually built a stake of more than 13% of the company. It just goes to show, richer clients can do what they want on the Market and walk all over retail investors.
Cor™
- 10 Aug 2004 11:28
- 403 of 706
Thanks Tradx666
Kivver
- 10 Aug 2004 14:56
- 404 of 706
Am i right in reading TF bought 2m shares, if this is so he must have had genuine faith in what the company had to say.
Kivver
- 10 Aug 2004 15:52
- 405 of 706
The inside knowledge wasn't much good by the look of it, he (and others) must be quite a few quid down!!!
apple
- 10 Aug 2004 15:58
- 406 of 706
Up again today, I wish that I had held on to more of them.