Some good news at last from this weeks Shares mag. Tim Freeborn revisits the company and altho no firm details are given about new deals he says they will be announced this quarter. I would think that this could be at the same time as the interim results are announced. I for one will be holding on cos they will fly sooner rather than later! ( 8.30% up today!)

Tradx, yes very funny :)

Tradx are you the Tradx666 poster on advfn ? If not plse ignore the post below

If so maybe you help me.

I have done a bit of digging into the Netteller model via their prospectus and as you appear to know something about them can you answer these please:

-Is current revenues mostly US based
-If the US decided to stop NLR taking monies from the US there revenue would be almost ziltch.
-If the US decided to regulate gaming, then again Netteller would be no use to people as they could use their cards as normal.

I understand they are moving into Europe to hedge their exposure from the US. Do they have banks linked to their product apart from the US ? If so how many ?

To me Netteller do look risky because a large proportion of their revenue is US based.

Paulvoigt, if your an experienced/professional investor/trader you can do anything you like with any broker if you have money.

I wonder if there is a shorting on this share. Are any of the contributors to this thread doing so.

If there are I think I can guess who!!!

toldmeso,

Yes, and I have answered all your questions on the BLM board over there, but I'm happy to copy the post to here if you want..?

If you think my stance on epo is now negative because I hold NLR than you are seriously mistaken..as I said previously, orginally when I started researching epo I was very positive, and then all you have to do is read this thread and Tim's comments (and of course others..)..

Keep smiling.

oneill,

In fairness to Tim, he has to call it as he hears it and sees it, his view was hold for a week..etc as for the 22 million CFD position, if true, then the only thing that matters is that the lack of news from the company will have created the conditions which would make this possible. I too am surprised at Tim, especially after the deals he reffered to here, but you can only guess that his info is better than most and he is still confident that they are going to happen.

Over on the adfvn, one poster (you know the one) reckons that the COO resigned around a month ago, could this be the reason for the run down?

Be lucky.

Hi Tradx666, is advfn down at the moment or is it just me?

Cor,

It's definitly down - again!!

regards

T..

Paulvoigt - 05 Aug'04 - 11:56 - 444 of 453

CFD's for EPO!!! my understanding was CFD's were limited to the major stocks not minows like EPO, can any one shed any light?


Take a look at IND (Cap. < 5m) with an anonymous CFD position so large that the CFD company (UBS) had to issue an RNS!

They actually built a stake of more than 13% of the company. It just goes to show, richer clients can do what they want on the Market and walk all over retail investors.

Thanks Tradx666

Am i right in reading TF bought 2m shares, if this is so he must have had genuine faith in what the company had to say.

The inside knowledge wasn't much good by the look of it, he (and others) must be quite a few quid down!!!

Up again today, I wish that I had held on to more of them.

Shares mag this week says hold again.

Everyone

Please don't ask Shares journalists to take part in discussions about anything they write. They are not in a position to do so. We're happy to respond to comments but only via the Letters page in the magazine, which of course can be downloaded on MoneyAM. We're not being bloody minded about this but there are regulatory issues involved for us here.

Shares editor

I imagaine they have received a threatening letter from RC & co as is the norm.

Oneill. How long will it be before you are a potential pain in your arse to your self?

oneill,

Your link does not lead to any info about EPO, nor do the links from that page!

http://www.courtservice.gov.uk/cms/3535.htm

Please give us the real link.

OK, I'll spell this out one more time. Regardless of what you have read here before, Shares reporters will not enter into correspondence or discussion about the content of the magazine unless it is via the Shares letters page. It is therefore unfair to post a criticism and berate them for not taking part in the discussion. This is our policy. End of discussion.

Shares ed

I have been in support of TF but with posts from the editor like this makes me wonder whether I was correct in my judgement. If it was not company policy for journalists to write here and TF should not have done so in the past then write that please.......posters only berated TF because he appeared and posted about a post office deal etc.........and then disappeared again........

Oneill.......be mindful that the editor has maybe bought shares in EPO as well!