Some good news at last from this weeks Shares mag. Tim Freeborn revisits the company and altho no firm details are given about new deals he says they will be announced this quarter. I would think that this could be at the same time as the interim results are announced. I for one will be holding on cos they will fly sooner rather than later! ( 8.30% up today!)

toldmeso,

Yes, and I have answered all your questions on the BLM board over there, but I'm happy to copy the post to here if you want..?

If you think my stance on epo is now negative because I hold NLR than you are seriously mistaken..as I said previously, orginally when I started researching epo I was very positive, and then all you have to do is read this thread and Tim's comments (and of course others..)..

Keep smiling.

oneill,

In fairness to Tim, he has to call it as he hears it and sees it, his view was hold for a week..etc as for the 22 million CFD position, if true, then the only thing that matters is that the lack of news from the company will have created the conditions which would make this possible. I too am surprised at Tim, especially after the deals he reffered to here, but you can only guess that his info is better than most and he is still confident that they are going to happen.

Over on the adfvn, one poster (you know the one) reckons that the COO resigned around a month ago, could this be the reason for the run down?

Be lucky.

Hi Tradx666, is advfn down at the moment or is it just me?

Cor,

It's definitly down - again!!

regards

T..

Paulvoigt - 05 Aug'04 - 11:56 - 444 of 453

CFD's for EPO!!! my understanding was CFD's were limited to the major stocks not minows like EPO, can any one shed any light?


Take a look at IND (Cap. < 5m) with an anonymous CFD position so large that the CFD company (UBS) had to issue an RNS!

They actually built a stake of more than 13% of the company. It just goes to show, richer clients can do what they want on the Market and walk all over retail investors.

Thanks Tradx666

Am i right in reading TF bought 2m shares, if this is so he must have had genuine faith in what the company had to say.

The inside knowledge wasn't much good by the look of it, he (and others) must be quite a few quid down!!!

Up again today, I wish that I had held on to more of them.

Shares mag this week says hold again.

Everyone

Please don't ask Shares journalists to take part in discussions about anything they write. They are not in a position to do so. We're happy to respond to comments but only via the Letters page in the magazine, which of course can be downloaded on MoneyAM. We're not being bloody minded about this but there are regulatory issues involved for us here.

Shares editor

I imagaine they have received a threatening letter from RC & co as is the norm.

Oneill. How long will it be before you are a potential pain in your arse to your self?

oneill,

Your link does not lead to any info about EPO, nor do the links from that page!

http://www.courtservice.gov.uk/cms/3535.htm

Please give us the real link.

OK, I'll spell this out one more time. Regardless of what you have read here before, Shares reporters will not enter into correspondence or discussion about the content of the magazine unless it is via the Shares letters page. It is therefore unfair to post a criticism and berate them for not taking part in the discussion. This is our policy. End of discussion.

Shares ed

I have been in support of TF but with posts from the editor like this makes me wonder whether I was correct in my judgement. If it was not company policy for journalists to write here and TF should not have done so in the past then write that please.......posters only berated TF because he appeared and posted about a post office deal etc.........and then disappeared again........

Oneill.......be mindful that the editor has maybe bought shares in EPO as well!

There is no link, this is the only mention on the page.


APPLICATIONS BEFORE QUEENS BENCH MASTERS
ROOM E102
Before DEPUTY MASTER NUSSEY
Thursday, 12th August, 2004

At 11 oclock
The Mayor & Commalty & Citizens of London v- Senghore
Earth Port Plc v- Baltimore Technologies

Re Shares Magazine Editor & Tim Freeborn

I don't wish to comment further at present other than remind everyone what i've had to say on the story to date, however i believe i've been totally vindicated on everything i've posted in view of todays statement from Editor, i plan to comment in more detail at a later stage when appropriate.

I think we should be told if other staff purchased shares in EPO other than TF.

Regards

JW

This is my first post to an interesting BB. There appears to be a lot of heat being generated, perhaps understandably, by the situation - a lot of people including myself are sitting on significant losses. I would make three points:
(1) Shares mag, including Jeremy Lacey and JF are very much on the side of the small investor. Take this week's comment that 'trading statement this week is encouraging'. So you ask: 'what trading statement?'. They have seen a trading statement that is not embargoed, although not yet published, and that is helpful to me as an investor. So JF has been open in his comments and perhaps trespassed on the limits of journalists license; but he has been doing this in his role of helping the investors who read his magazine. So Earthport have a CE who is not particularly wise in claiming as win situations which are not yet closed. But any of us in business has experienced that and probably made such claims ourselves. As an investor, once I suss out that tendency I factor it into my assessment. I reckon we are bloody lucky to have such a good information source.
(2) If a journalist makes a recommendation, I do not make a decision on the basis of that investment; what I do is to study the evidence. I bought Earthport because I was impressed by their interim report which demonstrates that they have achieved technical and marketing breakthroughs in a potentially very lucrative market. OK, some of those statements were overstated, but the key thing is to await the next firm evidence.
(3) Having said that, I have sold quarter of my earthport holding today. The reason is that my three current holdings (Earthport, ASOS and Alizyme) are competing against each other. ASOS have doubled whilst Earthport have halved, which interestingly is a 25% gain overall. I am very confident that ASOS will double to 1 in the autumn (see my comments on the ASOS bb); I am reasonably confident that earthport will recover to 3p. The key in both cases is the capitalisation. ASOS are capitalised at just over 30m plus; their brokers, Seymour Pearce, are forecasting 67m by the year-end; that figure is low in the light of the current rate of growth and cash generation. earthport are capitalised at some 8M; low compared to the value of their firm contracts with Sportingbet, etc., Wannadoo and in Hong Kong. I'm not as certain that they will hit 15M this year because I haven't got decent figures to base projections on. But I am holding the remaining 75% of my portfolio.
So please accept that we now have a better basis for holding; the story is still as strong; the key question is whether the management can prove themselves. The lawsuit is a potential bonus; I doubt whether it is distacting the management from their primary task.