Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Kenmare Resource - Potential For Re-Reating (KMR)     

intractable - 20 Jun 2004 11:22

From the FT on the 19th June

http://search.ft.com/search/article.html?id=040619001094&query=kenmare&vsc_appId=totalSearch&state=Form

COMPANIES UK & IRELAND: Kenmare negotiates $269m loan
By John Murray Brown
Financial Times; Jun 19, 2004



One of the largest debt financings for an independent mining company was announced yesterday when Kenmare Resources agreed a $269m (146.5m) facility to develop the Moma titanium mine in Mozambique.

Drawdown of the debt is contingent on the Irish company raising equity of $79m, lifting the value of the project to $345m.

The company already has commitments of $55m from a number of large investment funds.

Documents will be posted to shareholders on Monday for an open offer to raise up to $42m.

A banker at NM Rothschild, lead advisers on the financing, said the debt package represented three times Kenmare's market capitalisation of $90m.

"I do not think there have been any listed mining companies who have done that," he said.

Among the lenders, the African Development Bank is lending $40m and the European Investment Bank $15m in senior debt and a $40m subordinated loan, reflecting the vital economic benefits to what is the poorest region of one of Africa's poorest countries.

Martin Curwen, of the EIB, said this was the first deal signed under the 2000 Cotonou agreement between the EU and African, Caribbean and Pacific countries.

He said EIB's presence would "provide comfort" to other lenders. "It is part of our mandate to support projects where the funding would not have been available from the financial markets," he said at yesterday's signing ceremony, attended by Castigo Langa, Mozambique's minister of mineral resources and energy.

KFW, the German development finance institution, is providing $50m, partly tied to the supply of electrical equipment by Siemens.

The Dutch development agency FMO is lending $15m. The only commercial bank involved is ABSA, the South African bank, which is lending $80m to support the purchase of South African goods and services by the mine.

The mine is expected to be in production in the second half of 2006, with annual output of 600,000 tonnes of ilmenite and other titanium minerals that supplies white pigment used in paint and toothpaste.

The company has already raised 4m to purchase a mineral separation plant in Western Australia, which is being dismantled and shipped to the site.

At full production, the mine will account for about 5 per cent of world supply. About two-thirds of world production is controlled by RTZ and Iluka, an Australian company spun out of the old Rennison Goldfields.

FT Comment

* There have been similar financings in the minerals sector but never where the borrowing is three times the borrower's market valuation. The Lihir gold project in Papua New Guinea raised $300m in 1995 but lenders had the comfort that Rio Tinto Zinc owned about 40 per cent of the company. Kenmare's project is 100 per cent-owned by Kenmare, a company that has no cash flow and would have reported a small loss of $40,000 last year but for interest on its bank deposits. This project clearly could transform its fortunes. There are offtake agreements in place for more than half the first five years' production with Dupont and Mitsui. Prices for mineral sands tend to be more stable than base metals, which behave more like a commodity dependent on capital goods demand. The current market cap is little more than the value of a year's production from the mine. An upgrade seems inevitable. Canaccord, the company's broker, has a current price target of 35p. This compares with a close of 17p, down 2p yesterday.


Copyright The Financial Times Ltd

pro2 - 07 Jun 2005 08:00 - 399 of 1136

I wouldn't buy KMR for several reasons. For one, I'm not attracted to shares which are ramped. For two, this share has been in the doldrums for some time. It was over 28 pence a few months ago and is now under 25 pence. A good share produces a profit for shareholders -not a loss!

Dynamite - 07 Jun 2005 08:12 - 400 of 1136

Pro 2 I suppose you are a clone of 'Pro'. You are now squelched like him cos' you sound a deliberate deramper like him! Squelched

pro2 - 07 Jun 2005 08:15 - 401 of 1136

Dynamite - 07 Jun 2005 08:17 - 402 of 1136

Stockdog,

Welcome aboard KMR...a longer term ride but a very profitable one me thinks. Hmmmmmm well I can say that for the second year running: a brilliant start to the year and then doldrums again...but if it is like last year ...then I had lift off again. I haven't posted much as there isn't much to say at the mo. I still don't have any SEO as it is still going down and I am waiting on other things. I am just playing the waiting game at present tick tock.
Di

pro2 - 07 Jun 2005 08:25 - 403 of 1136

For those of you who like fantasy, keep buying.
For those of you who like facts, here are a few. These are the FACTS re trading since 30 March:

Buys(): 4,495,651
Sell():11,683,484 (quite a discrepancy there I feel)
Buyers: 561
Sellers: 794

There is a rumour of a rights issue which, if correct, would seriously dilute the share price. Perhaps the stats tell all?

FILTHY POOR - 07 Jun 2005 13:24 - 404 of 1136

pro2 - your obviously the same twat thats posting the
same load of bollocks on A_D_V_F_N.
The rights issue rumour was started by you.
Maybe you could tell us why they would need the cash for
a fully funded project and maybe you can't.

Also, your buys vs sells figures, are totally inaccurate.
This is now traded on SETS, (DYOR) and IMO is being accumulated
which is currently keeping the SP in this very tight range.

stockdog - 07 Jun 2005 14:27 - 405 of 1136

pro2 - sorry to be dumb, but I don't understand the relationship between the buy and sell figures you quote and the price of Titanium Oxide. Have I missed something fundamental here?

sd

ptholden - 07 Jun 2005 15:53 - 406 of 1136

sd

Waste of time trying to converse with the schizophrenic one of many aliases, he's sort of been hunted down so to speak.

I noticed over on the Traders Thread for today that KMR was flagged up as one to watch. Don't have an interest myself, but good luck.

pth

bhunt1910 - 08 Jun 2005 08:45 - 407 of 1136

Morning stockdog & all - just browsing this thread - as I have no holding in Kenmare - and can confirm that I am no relation to bhuntly - who I think has now been remnoved by moneyam anyway.

Good Luck guys & gals

Baza

Dynamite - 08 Jun 2005 09:15 - 408 of 1136

Thanks Baza

stockdog - 08 Jun 2005 10:43 - 409 of 1136

Come on in Baza, the water's lovely. Then you can dry off on all those acres of scorching red sand.

sd

Rebels - 09 Jun 2005 19:36 - 410 of 1136

I hold from 16p and never sold as I am holding till at least production/taken out but I do wonder if anyone actually did sell due to comments made by 1pro.

My question is can anyone who sold out because of 1pro comments, such as "Miners have gone on strike" and the "Right issues" which were clearly pack of lies made up, successfully sue the guy?

stockdog - 09 Jun 2005 19:58 - 411 of 1136

Rebels
Suing a loser generally does not yield a regular income, since they have no assets, 'cos they lost them all, 'cos they're a loser. So, I like the sentiment, but it will remain a piece of conceptual art for me.

I work in a risk management business where we simply are not in the market to buy opinion - we require facts on which we make our own judgement. So, my antennae are sharply attuned to any form of salesmanship and my entire being programmed to reject their assertions.

Good facts need no salesmanship. I would never dream of selling on a bashers comment (or buying on a ramper's one for that matter).

I remain a proud holder of these shares at least until production as you so correctly suggest.

sd

LDettori - 10 Jun 2005 08:44 - 412 of 1136

If anyone sells based on Pro's comments they deserve to be in an asylum (the same one he got released from). This will be 35p before the end of this month and possibly 50p by August. There is serious business being discussed at the moment.

Kivver - 10 Jun 2005 10:04 - 413 of 1136

Thats the whole point rampers prey on the weak or uninitiated. Its our job (more experieced) to warn others about these heartless kretins. That why i and others followed him everywhere he went. Hope people took the sensilble option because his arguments were pretty thin. Its been said the police might have been involved, what crime would he have committed.

I also bought at 16 and hoping for a good return but as always do you own research (DYOR)

jimwren - 10 Jun 2005 19:26 - 414 of 1136

Deliberately making false statements to influence a company's share price, whether up or down, is a criminal offence. The problem is proving it was a false statement rather than somebody's "opinion". Nonetheless, a knock on the door from the fraud squad will probably a good frightener for these idiots. Like the rest of you I bought in at 14-16 and took the open offer - now I am waiting for production, before when I am sure we'll have more offtake agreements and possibly an upgrade to the extent of MOMA. All ramping aside, barring a total collapse in the world economy, its difficult to see much downside for KMR.

StarFrog - 15 Jun 2005 13:24 - 415 of 1136

I seem to be in two places at the same time. Whilst attending the funeral of my father on the 6th June I appear to have been posting both on this site and on the AXM thread under the name starrfog (2 r's and no capitals).

I have no shares or interest in either of these two companies.

stockdog - 15 Jun 2005 13:30 - 416 of 1136

Starfrog - sorry to hear about your father. Thanks for the correction.

Why do professional bashers choose names (and style of rant) that are so obvious to us poor fools who hang on their every word?

sd

StarFrog - 15 Jun 2005 13:38 - 417 of 1136

Thank you, stockdog.

I agree with your sentiments - though I must admit that I do have a bit of a chuckle when I read the continuing bickering between multi-username individuals.

However, those individuals should tread carefully. Whilst what they write may not be covered by the laws of libel in the UK, all posters should be aware that BBs such as this one are viewed and read throughout the world. In some countries, what is written could be considered as libel and an individual can be charged with libel in another country even though their post was placed in a country where that charge would not apply. This is one of the legal grey areas that the internet has given us.

Kivver - 15 Jun 2005 13:51 - 418 of 1136

see post 413, the multiposter has disappeared not only from this site but others too. Something has spooked him!!! Roll on kmr by the way, going great guns. starfrog get in before its to late, after doing your research of course.
Register now or login to post to this thread.