intractable
- 20 Jun 2004 11:22
From the FT on the 19th June
http://search.ft.com/search/article.html?id=040619001094&query=kenmare&vsc_appId=totalSearch&state=Form
COMPANIES UK & IRELAND: Kenmare negotiates $269m loan
By John Murray Brown
Financial Times; Jun 19, 2004
One of the largest debt financings for an independent mining company was announced yesterday when Kenmare Resources agreed a $269m (146.5m) facility to develop the Moma titanium mine in Mozambique.
Drawdown of the debt is contingent on the Irish company raising equity of $79m, lifting the value of the project to $345m.
The company already has commitments of $55m from a number of large investment funds.
Documents will be posted to shareholders on Monday for an open offer to raise up to $42m.
A banker at NM Rothschild, lead advisers on the financing, said the debt package represented three times Kenmare's market capitalisation of $90m.
"I do not think there have been any listed mining companies who have done that," he said.
Among the lenders, the African Development Bank is lending $40m and the European Investment Bank $15m in senior debt and a $40m subordinated loan, reflecting the vital economic benefits to what is the poorest region of one of Africa's poorest countries.
Martin Curwen, of the EIB, said this was the first deal signed under the 2000 Cotonou agreement between the EU and African, Caribbean and Pacific countries.
He said EIB's presence would "provide comfort" to other lenders. "It is part of our mandate to support projects where the funding would not have been available from the financial markets," he said at yesterday's signing ceremony, attended by Castigo Langa, Mozambique's minister of mineral resources and energy.
KFW, the German development finance institution, is providing $50m, partly tied to the supply of electrical equipment by Siemens.
The Dutch development agency FMO is lending $15m. The only commercial bank involved is ABSA, the South African bank, which is lending $80m to support the purchase of South African goods and services by the mine.
The mine is expected to be in production in the second half of 2006, with annual output of 600,000 tonnes of ilmenite and other titanium minerals that supplies white pigment used in paint and toothpaste.
The company has already raised 4m to purchase a mineral separation plant in Western Australia, which is being dismantled and shipped to the site.
At full production, the mine will account for about 5 per cent of world supply. About two-thirds of world production is controlled by RTZ and Iluka, an Australian company spun out of the old Rennison Goldfields.
FT Comment
* There have been similar financings in the minerals sector but never where the borrowing is three times the borrower's market valuation. The Lihir gold project in Papua New Guinea raised $300m in 1995 but lenders had the comfort that Rio Tinto Zinc owned about 40 per cent of the company. Kenmare's project is 100 per cent-owned by Kenmare, a company that has no cash flow and would have reported a small loss of $40,000 last year but for interest on its bank deposits. This project clearly could transform its fortunes. There are offtake agreements in place for more than half the first five years' production with Dupont and Mitsui. Prices for mineral sands tend to be more stable than base metals, which behave more like a commodity dependent on capital goods demand. The current market cap is little more than the value of a year's production from the mine. An upgrade seems inevitable. Canaccord, the company's broker, has a current price target of 35p. This compares with a close of 17p, down 2p yesterday.
Copyright The Financial Times Ltd
bhunt1910
- 08 Jun 2005 08:45
- 407 of 1136
Morning stockdog & all - just browsing this thread - as I have no holding in Kenmare - and can confirm that I am no relation to bhuntly - who I think has now been remnoved by moneyam anyway.
Good Luck guys & gals
Baza
stockdog
- 08 Jun 2005 10:43
- 409 of 1136
Come on in Baza, the water's lovely. Then you can dry off on all those acres of scorching red sand.
sd
Rebels
- 09 Jun 2005 19:36
- 410 of 1136
I hold from 16p and never sold as I am holding till at least production/taken out but I do wonder if anyone actually did sell due to comments made by 1pro.
My question is can anyone who sold out because of 1pro comments, such as "Miners have gone on strike" and the "Right issues" which were clearly pack of lies made up, successfully sue the guy?
stockdog
- 09 Jun 2005 19:58
- 411 of 1136
Rebels
Suing a loser generally does not yield a regular income, since they have no assets, 'cos they lost them all, 'cos they're a loser. So, I like the sentiment, but it will remain a piece of conceptual art for me.
I work in a risk management business where we simply are not in the market to buy opinion - we require facts on which we make our own judgement. So, my antennae are sharply attuned to any form of salesmanship and my entire being programmed to reject their assertions.
Good facts need no salesmanship. I would never dream of selling on a bashers comment (or buying on a ramper's one for that matter).
I remain a proud holder of these shares at least until production as you so correctly suggest.
sd
LDettori
- 10 Jun 2005 08:44
- 412 of 1136
If anyone sells based on Pro's comments they deserve to be in an asylum (the same one he got released from). This will be 35p before the end of this month and possibly 50p by August. There is serious business being discussed at the moment.
Kivver
- 10 Jun 2005 10:04
- 413 of 1136
Thats the whole point rampers prey on the weak or uninitiated. Its our job (more experieced) to warn others about these heartless kretins. That why i and others followed him everywhere he went. Hope people took the sensilble option because his arguments were pretty thin. Its been said the police might have been involved, what crime would he have committed.
I also bought at 16 and hoping for a good return but as always do you own research (DYOR)
jimwren
- 10 Jun 2005 19:26
- 414 of 1136
Deliberately making false statements to influence a company's share price, whether up or down, is a criminal offence. The problem is proving it was a false statement rather than somebody's "opinion". Nonetheless, a knock on the door from the fraud squad will probably a good frightener for these idiots. Like the rest of you I bought in at 14-16 and took the open offer - now I am waiting for production, before when I am sure we'll have more offtake agreements and possibly an upgrade to the extent of MOMA. All ramping aside, barring a total collapse in the world economy, its difficult to see much downside for KMR.
StarFrog
- 15 Jun 2005 13:24
- 415 of 1136
I seem to be in two places at the same time. Whilst attending the funeral of my father on the 6th June I appear to have been posting both on this site and on the AXM thread under the name starrfog (2 r's and no capitals).
I have no shares or interest in either of these two companies.
stockdog
- 15 Jun 2005 13:30
- 416 of 1136
Starfrog - sorry to hear about your father. Thanks for the correction.
Why do professional bashers choose names (and style of rant) that are so obvious to us poor fools who hang on their every word?
sd
StarFrog
- 15 Jun 2005 13:38
- 417 of 1136
Thank you, stockdog.
I agree with your sentiments - though I must admit that I do have a bit of a chuckle when I read the continuing bickering between multi-username individuals.
However, those individuals should tread carefully. Whilst what they write may not be covered by the laws of libel in the UK, all posters should be aware that BBs such as this one are viewed and read throughout the world. In some countries, what is written could be considered as libel and an individual can be charged with libel in another country even though their post was placed in a country where that charge would not apply. This is one of the legal grey areas that the internet has given us.
Kivver
- 15 Jun 2005 13:51
- 418 of 1136
see post 413, the multiposter has disappeared not only from this site but others too. Something has spooked him!!! Roll on kmr by the way, going great guns. starfrog get in before its to late, after doing your research of course.
Kivver
- 21 Jun 2005 17:36
- 419 of 1136
still doing well but you must dyor!
stockdog
- 23 Jun 2005 08:16
- 420 of 1136
Will the next few days show the SP forming a double top at 28.50p before retreating south, or carry on through to an assault on the previous high of 32p in February 1997 - now that would be something.
stockdog
- 23 Jun 2005 09:19
- 422 of 1136
Too right. We're up passed the 28.50p level already today. I bet there'll be quite some selling from some relieved old investors when we hit 32p - more fool them, just when the asset is going to start producing, but it always seems to happen.
Should someone give Botty a nudge to tell him to take his finger off the button? I guess he's treating breach of hte recent high as a buy signal - which I agree with.
Just one really positive RNS and we'd be up into new territory I feel, but as ever patience is required. After all, the TiO2's not going anywhere, is it.
sd
jimwren
- 23 Jun 2005 15:50
- 423 of 1136
No, but with the dollar (which most commodities are priced in) strenghtening, particularly against the Euro, it can only add more eventual profit to KMR's bottom line.
Kivver
- 23 Jun 2005 17:49
- 424 of 1136
the deramper is the same ramper from AXM and it seems he has disappeared for the time being but he has got it gloriously wrong on both counts. Im glad i am doing well with this share its make up for the misery on bprg, cyh and sps!! Like you said the real profits will come in when the mine opens, until then i can see a volatile SP with profit takers and nervy investors. My advice buy on the dips but you must DYOR!
stockdog
- 30 Jun 2005 20:13
- 425 of 1136
Excellent upbeat statement from the Chairman accompanying todays 2004 Final Accounts.
All looks to be on time on target with sale prices and capacity higher than planned at financing stage.
sd
http://www.kenmareresources.com/InvestorRelations/ChairmanStatement.html
jimwren
- 01 Jul 2005 14:14
- 426 of 1136
A good write up in today's IC