LEEWINK
- 12 Aug 2003 11:59
looks like its hit oil, don't know whats gonna happen, any idea's ???
barclay
- 12 Apr 2006 16:51
- 410 of 567
Anyone have any idea what the recent rise is for? There is no news out today, but
something tells me were heading for 200p and over very shortly!
We've beat our recent high Soul Traders, good luck everybody!
Barclay
myownmoney
- 12 Apr 2006 17:01
- 411 of 567
I hope my pacemaker keeps up with this rise. :-)
myownmoney
- 13 Apr 2006 22:58
- 414 of 567
Soul trader, I agree what a lovely stock, it helps the pension a bit...
Be nice to see some news though.
Makepeace
- 19 Apr 2006 11:42
- 416 of 567
Has anyone any idea on all the sells today??? Or is this just profit taking.
hlyeo98
- 19 Apr 2006 12:16
- 417 of 567
It is profit taking...NOP has more upside
barclay
- 23 Apr 2006 17:25
- 421 of 567
I'd just like to say guys that Northern's net asset value of 360p is based on oil at 40 dollars a barrel; the current price is nearly twice that and rising!
When we start production this year or early next year, the shares will get valued on
the price earnings ratio for that sector, based on spot oil prices, which nearly every anaylst agrees won't go back down to 40 dollars again: because of the scarcity of oil.
The current price dip doesn't worry me one bit: i have bought the most liquid asset in the world at 100 per cent discount to net asset value - even at the very conservative 40 dollars a barrel estimate.
barclay
soul traders
- 24 Apr 2006 11:56
- 422 of 567
Great post, Barclay - I'm not sure how NAV will translate into P/E as obviously it depends on the amount of production involved, but I agree that the higher resources prices will drive profits higher, and that clearly the sensible, conservative figures used in NOP's feasibility study are going to be far outstripped by the spot prices in the real world, at least for the near future.
Don't forget that much of the Dutch stuff in the near future is going to be gas-to-electricity. Naturally this is expected to be very profitable - indeed, it is an ideal situation as NOP and its JV partner will have a more vertically-integrated business with fewer middlemen, but it is the price of electricity at the wall socket in Holland, that will dictate revenue rates for the G2E project and not the price of crude. Just an observation - in the end, though, it should still all mean higher profits at the end of the day.
The bottom line? NOP is still a great buy, IMVHO. DYOR, etc.
barclay
- 26 Apr 2006 04:51
- 424 of 567
Great news about Credit Suisse: it gives us a vote of confidence.
You are absolutely right about the gas thing soul trader, the gas totally outweighs the oil bit, but what i meant to say was 19 million 2p barrels of oil in the dutch portfolio doesn't seem like a lot, but when you do the maths, at say a conservative 40 dollars a barrel *19 million barrels: it works out at circa 800 million dollars!
This of which is discounted over so many years and costs deducted of course which if it was say 650 million would still leave 150 million dollars left - 85 to 90 million pounds, around what our current market cap is.
.
in my view this on its own, without the gas probably supports the share price of today - even without the oil and gas at papekop.
barclay
Rutherford
- 26 Apr 2006 07:16
- 425 of 567
Keep in mind that costs will be covered by the 1.30 pounds refund from NAM for every pound NOP spend!
soul traders
- 26 Apr 2006 11:54
- 426 of 567
Barclay, I believe you're making the right noises, as my old maths teacher used to say, but please bear in mind that the standard method of valuing oil and gas reserves uses the "risked" basis, which takes the estimated reserves x guideline oil price and applies a percentage value to arrive at the net asset value. The percentage value used as a rule of thumb is usually 10%, although I have occasionally seen 15%. I'm not sure of the underlying criteria for which rate to apply.
The following figures are from Panmure's estimate:
"Based on these additional reserves, Northern is now booking 34.6mmboe net 2P reserves and we move our NAV to 341p and our target to 360p from 145p."
Full text under:
http://www.northpet.com/research/files/Panmure_Morning_Note_24-03-06.pdf
I'd like to break down the maths a bit further but as I cannot do so with any certainty, I shall refrain. You'll agree that the above is good news, though.
hlyeo98
- 26 Apr 2006 11:56
- 427 of 567
Indeed, very good news and NOP looking cheap at this rate