Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Rockhopper Exploration (RKH)     

markymar - 15 Aug 2005 15:14

Web Page Traffic Counter

http://www.falklands-oil.com/

http://www.rockhopperexploration.co.uk

http://www.argosresources.com/




Rockhopper was established in 2004 with a strategy to invest in and undertake an offshore oil exploration programme in the North Falkland Basin. It was floated on AIM in August 2005. Rockhopper was the first company to make a commercial oil discovery in the Falklands. Today Rockhopper is the largest acreage holder in the North Falkland Basin, with interests in the Greater Mediterranean region.




free counters

HARRYCAT - 08 Feb 2011 11:36 - 4187 of 6294

The question is, why did it go from 360p up to 388p on no news. So sp has now reverted back to it's fair value level. I seem to remember this happening before and the news turned out to be terrific.

markymar - 08 Feb 2011 11:42 - 4188 of 6294

One thing for sure RKH keep a tight ship and we wont find out untill an RNS.

Off subject this but did anyone see the news last night of a jewellery shop being raided by 6 thugsSuper granny to the rescue!!!! Amazing courage deserves a mention.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXMsIioIWYg&feature=related

aldwickk - 08 Feb 2011 11:45 - 4189 of 6294

I think the fair value is about 400p , was going to take profit if it went near to that yesterday.

HARRYCAT - 08 Feb 2011 11:48 - 4190 of 6294

On current recoverable estimates the chart doesn't agree with you. Somewhere between 300-350p seems to be about right. 400p is just greedy! ;o)

cynic - 09 Feb 2011 08:28 - 4191 of 6294

it is certainly of some concern that sp is down again ahead of the imminent result ..... very glad i lightened my load yesterday

HARRYCAT - 09 Feb 2011 08:38 - 4192 of 6294

Not particularly heavy trading in this stock, so wouldn't yet be too concerned.

required field - 09 Feb 2011 08:45 - 4193 of 6294

Any moment now....result due.....could drop up to 40p in all or so...or.....a shuttle like takeoff......fingers crossed...but better to be in than not....shares that it.....spreads and cfds.....too risky....

cynic - 09 Feb 2011 09:02 - 4194 of 6294

CFDs are effectively shares ..... the risk is that one gets over-exposed as only a deposit of 10/25% has to be put down - can't remember what it is on RKH

required field - 09 Feb 2011 09:11 - 4195 of 6294

It's alright if you are watching every minute....I can't...and ......my experience is that you on a bad result you get stopped out way below your stoploss...just before a rebound.....aggghhh....have to be sharp with these...very....I would have thought it would be 25% upfront for these...at least...depends on your credit I suppose...

cynic - 09 Feb 2011 09:56 - 4196 of 6294

deposit is based on the perceived risk of the stock or similar - RKH is indeed 25% .... XEL is on a sliding scale related to quantity, but 25%+, whereas TLW is 5% .... other than that, i do not run stop-losses for the very reason you mention .... in any case, and as i have posted a number of times, unless it's a guaranteed stop, you can be stopped out well below the level you anticipated

required field - 09 Feb 2011 10:06 - 4197 of 6294

Can't always get a guaranteed stop.....that would be good with RKH...if you can get one...

cynic - 09 Feb 2011 10:09 - 4198 of 6294

(i think) guaranteed stops have to be placed at time of purchase and are not allowed less than 10% below the market level, and as you say, may not even be possible on some

HARRYCAT - 09 Feb 2011 10:38 - 4199 of 6294

A good reminder to me as to why I steer clear of S/b & CFD's. At least if it all goes wrong with holding stock you are not forced to sell.

cynic - 09 Feb 2011 10:53 - 4200 of 6294

as there are no time constraints, you're never forced to sell CFDs unless you don't have the margin to put up ..... that said, it can be pretty scary at times and not sure how i would feel if i did not work with a pc all day

halifax - 09 Feb 2011 12:53 - 4201 of 6294

sp slipping away without news.

markymar - 09 Feb 2011 13:24 - 4202 of 6294

Nobody new any thing last time and the SP was slipping when the news came out the blue,they did say 38 days so we could still have another week to wait.

HARRYCAT - 09 Feb 2011 14:27 - 4203 of 6294

ARG not tracking this drop (yet), which is a positive note, imo.

cynic - 09 Feb 2011 14:28 - 4204 of 6294

conversely, ARG getting all set to do so!

HARRYCAT - 09 Feb 2011 14:30 - 4205 of 6294

What's that expression about keeping your head while all others around you are losing theirs.......?

cynic - 09 Feb 2011 14:31 - 4206 of 6294

only when below the parapet, and then someone sneaks up behind you and sticks a bayonet up your arse
Register now or login to post to this thread.