PapalPower
- 21 Nov 2005 08:12
seawallwalker
- 29 Sep 2006 08:06
- 428 of 2087
EME suspended pending an announcement.
Quite ridiculous as this is already known!!
FWIW all the partners did the same in Oz overnight, then resumed up around 20% on the news I have alredy posted.
I had thought I would take a punt, but as they have raised the lifeboat till high tide, I dont think I will bother.
cynic
- 29 Sep 2006 08:12
- 429 of 2087
seagoon* ..... leave well alone, to make a rather bad pun but with serious undertone
seawallwalker
- 29 Sep 2006 08:14
- 430 of 2087
It's alright cynic, I was only thinking, it's gone now.
It looked for a moment there was some froth to be had.
Not anymore
tcdmct
- 29 Sep 2006 08:51
- 431 of 2087
Can anyone 1 enlighten my on why these shares have been suspended please.
Hi Jimbo.
hlyeo98
- 29 Sep 2006 08:56
- 432 of 2087
More bad news again....no commercial flow in Sugarloaf
cynic
- 29 Sep 2006 09:09
- 433 of 2087
if that is so, just wish i was not another Cassandra ..... those with a classical education will understand!
seawallwalker
- 29 Sep 2006 09:15
- 434 of 2087
tcdmct - if you look 2 posts above you will see why!
However they are doing just the same as the partners did overnight in Oz, which I thought I had already said?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassandra
Cassandra
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For other uses, see Cassandra (disambiguation).
Painting by Evelyn De Morgan.In Greek mythology, Cassandra ("she who entangles men") (also known as Alexandra) was a daughter of King Priam and Queen Hecuba of Troy whose beauty caused Apollo to grant her the gift of prophecy. However, when she did not return his love, Apollo placed a curse on her so that no one would ever believe her predictions.
I like Battlestar Galactica myself!
cynic
- 29 Sep 2006 09:21
- 435 of 2087
exactly so seagoon ...... the great unwashed will only recognise the name as that of some columnist in of the tabloids
tcdmct
- 29 Sep 2006 09:43
- 436 of 2087
hlyeo98 why would the price go up as stated above if there is nothing there as you stated.
cynic
- 29 Sep 2006 10:42
- 437 of 2087
??????????????????
clearly no longer suspended and news must be at least not negative as sp seemingly up 10p!!!!!!!!!!!!!
still avoid, certainly until all 100% clarified!
Confidant
- 29 Sep 2006 11:21
- 438 of 2087
Share price not clear to me and don't know much about the co but quickly looking at this report and prospect
They see mean reserve potential 800BCF -- say 1TCF for their benefit or mine really to make the calculation easy
Ready to flow gas in this area probably worth $1bln per TCF. OK that's $60m to EME - 30m, Given close to markets pipelines etc lets say 20m now if they get that 1TCF
This drill shows that they at least got what they were expecting in secondary targets, so the end of OCtober more likely to be a hit than a miss than yesterday.
A hit at expected levels should see share price go above 60p (30m MKTCap)for this prospect alone. Know nothing of the rest of company or debt/cash levels to say what rest is worth
seawallwalker
- 29 Sep 2006 12:20
- 439 of 2087
tcdmct - I am concerned that all the partners have thought it necessay to say,
"...the commercial significance of log interpreted possible pay can only be assessed by flow testing and that there is a risk that the zone may not flow at commercial rates."
That did not need to be said.
Interesting all the same.
cynic
- 29 Sep 2006 12:27
- 440 of 2087
furthermore, markets are unimpressed ..... only up about 5p on the day
Confidant
- 29 Sep 2006 12:36
- 441 of 2087
Not sure if this is good or bad sww
looking at rest of co now -- this is certainly most promiment now
They say possible multi-TCF target so let's say 3 TCF is total upside
On my calc if this flows that could be worth as much as 60m to EME on firming up of data --90m when flowing --- so now 180p but we're not going near that price yet
Mid case is for 1TCF -- 20m --- 60m when flowing -- so now 60p so we'll probably edge towards there until end Oct
Bottom case -- worthless and we're left with a oil find that needs to be tested and some water in Germany which may be turned into "wine" at a later date -- 20p per share
So overall reasonable but I know a better upside downside risk but I'm just not saying ;-)
seawallwalker
- 29 Sep 2006 12:46
- 442 of 2087
EME have followed the other partners in their course of action, so I say fair enough.
Ignoring the comment that did not need to be said, and they have yet to hit the primary target.
Not bad really.
What happens next?
Confidant
- 29 Sep 2006 13:03
- 443 of 2087
Cross your fingers and wait until November
Confidant
- 29 Sep 2006 14:51
- 444 of 2087
Where's the buying from ? The States?
Big Al
- 30 Sep 2006 00:20
- 445 of 2087
Secondary target has gas and we have talk in TCFs. Hmm, bit premature?
I'm rather interested in the highlighting of the "commerciality" or potential lack of it. This is quite bizarre. Think I'll forget today's news for now. Dunno which wireline logs were run, but there are tools which would give an indication of potential premeability, which would have to be confirmed by flowing it. It's always what is not said in these press releases that intrigue me. ;-)
Either way, it is highly unlikely they'll flow the 12 1/4" shows with this well if they set about testing the deeper stuff. With an further casings set, it is a fair task to get at it and flow it. I'm sure that if they felt it would be commercial enough they'd be making plans to leave that option open and they say nothing. Again, interesting.
Rutherford
- 30 Sep 2006 09:24
- 446 of 2087
Big Al-----it looks good!
Subject: Sugarloaf 1st Phase Good
Date: September 29, 2006
Sugarloaf Hosston 1st phase a success
We have dug the well to 14,480 and logged the upper sections.
Well was trying to flow back gas during the logging operations.
The Austin Chalk zone from 11,925 to 12,200 looks very oil productive. The log results may set us up to drill over 100 wells in offsetting lease (26,000 acres) to just produce the oil from that zone. The porosity is just about double from what is normally found NE of our well location. Some folks have successfully produced with as low as 3% porosity. We have 9 to 12% porosity.
Rutherford
- 30 Sep 2006 09:30
- 447 of 2087
Missed a bit:
The Edwards is from 12,275 to 14,000 looks tight or too dense to produce.
The Sligo formation begans about 14,500
The Hosston (Objective) begans at 17,000 Planned total depth is 21,000.
This morning they are running 9 5/8 casing to 14,480
This was dated 29th Sept.