Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Rockhopper Exploration (RKH)     

markymar - 15 Aug 2005 15:14

Web Page Traffic Counter

http://www.falklands-oil.com/

http://www.rockhopperexploration.co.uk

http://www.argosresources.com/




Rockhopper was established in 2004 with a strategy to invest in and undertake an offshore oil exploration programme in the North Falkland Basin. It was floated on AIM in August 2005. Rockhopper was the first company to make a commercial oil discovery in the Falklands. Today Rockhopper is the largest acreage holder in the North Falkland Basin, with interests in the Greater Mediterranean region.




free counters

gibby - 24 Mar 2011 15:21 - 4542 of 6294

maryky you are pushing me - are you that despearte to get your cash back? this epic will reverse - city bored for now

markymar - 24 Mar 2011 15:25 - 4543 of 6294

Grow up gibby,get my money back i bought some of these at 12p,i dont ramp or de ramp like your self.

The only thing pushing you are those silly little voices in your head.

gibby - 24 Mar 2011 15:28 - 4544 of 6294

marky
i never had a little voice
yours ok in your head - they seem active? good luck

gibby - 24 Mar 2011 15:31 - 4545 of 6294

m i was pushed - do not try again once only for you

markymar - 24 Mar 2011 15:43 - 4546 of 6294

put me on ignore then!!!!!you talk twaddle, your a waste of time and space.

greekman - 24 Mar 2011 17:35 - 4547 of 6294

Markmar,

Totally agree re waste of time and space.
This thread improved greatly when I put gibby and similar poster on squelch. It will improve even more when people stop answering these muppets.

avsec - 24 Mar 2011 18:00 - 4548 of 6294

Greek - I couldn't agree more. I took gibby off my squelch on Monday when I saw someone reply to one of his posts and since then I have rediscovered why I put him there in the first place! Same with some of the other sciolists - bliss!

Balerboy - 24 Mar 2011 18:20 - 4549 of 6294

I squelched cynic once........took a lot of cleaning up......won't be doing it again!!

cynic - 24 Mar 2011 18:27 - 4550 of 6294

i thought i talked a load of crap until i came across Gibby Gibbon who should be in his cage at whipsnade (with emu!)

Balerboy - 24 Mar 2011 19:04 - 4551 of 6294

lol.,.

gibby - 24 Mar 2011 20:24 - 4552 of 6294

what a fighbut this will be and cynic you have good and bad - i like the profit takingco

i know we all have a dispute - that is life

this co will spring back but i am told get ouy now and buy back

if you are decnt i might tell you as need to know only right now

and if you are savvy and in already spring in and jump back

gibby - 24 Mar 2011 20:39 - 4553 of 6294

i just read back LOL

are you prverse me and you in a cage - people pay fot that!!
maybe a yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
just need to charge enough!

gibby - 24 Mar 2011 20:41 - 4554 of 6294

that was to cyn

gibby - 24 Mar 2011 21:13 - 4555 of 6294

if i show interest movemant ahead
dont move unless a buyer
7 to 14 days lol!
t/o buy to my shock but would not be good sub current sp
that is the latest

gibby - 24 Mar 2011 21:26 - 4556 of 6294

tommos 300p
+/-
5 pqrcent

gibby - 24 Mar 2011 21:28 - 4557 of 6294

easy trading - kemarky
i never had a little voice
yours ok in your head - they seem active? good luckrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrcghinnngggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

cynic - 25 Mar 2011 07:40 - 4558 of 6294

glad amanita muscaria never had any appeal to me as you can see what it does to the brain

greekman - 25 Mar 2011 08:05 - 4559 of 6294

Wish posters would stick to the subject of RKH. I continually see that someone has posted, then click onto the link to see...well nothing remotely concerning RKH. This is getting as bad as the RKH thread was on iii.
I appreciate the odd post, including my earlier post that was none RKH, but that was to try to get the thread back on track.
Please give it a rest.

Balerboy - 25 Mar 2011 08:14 - 4560 of 6294

Gibby's gone off on one!!!lol

markymar - 25 Mar 2011 08:23 - 4561 of 6294

Good post from marlon on iii

1) sealion main fan top sand, 30m pay, OWC
2) sealion main fan lower sand, Water leg
3) sealion northern lobe thin sand, Water leg
4) sealion lowest sand thin sand, 3m pay

107m gross reservoir, 75% net to gross.

So we had 80m net pay total, 33m oil and 47m water.

We know that sand 3 was thin so let's say 5m of our "water pay" was here.

At 14/10-2 sand 1 was about 2x the size of sand 2 so assuming a similar ratio, sand 1 at 14/10-4 was 30m oil and 20m water, and sand 2 was 25m water.

So our OWC was at 2505m at 14/10-4 and 45m out of a potential 75m net pay fell below it in the main fan.

At 14/10-2 we had 34m of net pay in the main fan, had we not seen OWC at 14/10-4 this would have more than doubled!

So taking an average (32.5m down dip) we would potentially 55m of pay all above OWC!!

THE RELATIONSHIPS ARE NOT LINEAR...but it's a good start.

So what has 14/10-4 told us about P90 and P50 in the southern lobe.

1) the oil down to of 2505m absolute depth rules in the valley floor and western slope. This would increase P90 to over 100mmbs, my estimate 130mmbs
2) the oil net pay will be thinner across the valley floor than the required 35m average required for P50
3) the oil will be thicker than the required 35m in the areas between the 14/10-2 and 14/10-4 contours.
4) it is likely that net pay will be thinner than 35m up dip from 14/10-2
5) Therefore P50 is likely to be slightly lower than the 215mmbs shown in the CPR

BUT

Looking to the South
1) the MAJORITY of the additional 43km area in the new 3D is potentially up dip from 14/10-4 with a very large area in the "prime contour" region between 14/10-2 and 14/10-4.

2) there are at least three additional pay zones (Chatham, Sealion Lower and F3) which have shown oil net pay

3) it is more likely than not that these additional pay zones are either continued or replicated under the new 3D area.

There is so much high likelihood POTENTIAL. AND WHAT WE HAVE AT P90 IS COMMERCIAL.

It is looking very good from here!!!!

Register now or login to post to this thread.