Standard Chartered's Peter Sands takes the fight to Wall Street
From the above link :-
Bank sources have told The Sunday Telegraph that after several settlements with other banks in relation to similar issues – most notably Lloyds' $350m settlement in 2009 over breaching US sanctions on Iran – Standard Chartered began a detailed review of all U-turn payments from 2001-2007.
The analysis was completed at the end of 2011, and Standard Chartered's counsel have been involved in discussing next steps – a global settlement – with five regulators, one of which was the DFS.
The process has also involved interviews of senior and other executives, believed to include Sands himself and Lord [Mervyn] Davies, who was chief executive at the time the transactions took place.
The analysis covered 150m separate transactions, and under the bank's analysis, it found "a little under 300", totalling $14m in value, which were invalid U-turn payments.
"That's clearly wrong, we're sorry those mistakes occurred," Sands admitted last week. But what he refutes is that, as Lawsky alleges, there was a systematic attempt to circumvent sanctions. "The immediate question you ask is how do you get to $250bn?" Sands continued. "It's a figure which we don't completely recognise, but it is of the order of the total amount of U-turn payment transactions processed by Standard Chartered New York in the period 2001 to 2007.
"To conclude they were all invalid or in breach is to conclude everything we did in the U-turn mechanism was wrong."