Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Gulf Keystone Petroleum (GKP)     

goal - 15 Mar 2005 17:17

http://www.gulfkeystone.com/ The firms exploration programme in Algeria is going well and "the shares look good value", say the Investors Chronicle. Your comments please. goal.

html>

niceonecyril - 07 Jul 2014 05:41 - 4953 of 5505

Some nerviousness regarding the Times article,one view below?
----------------------------------------------------


LSE--CHEERS

NickiMinaj
Posts: 136
Off Topic
Opinion: Strong Buy
Price: 98.25
Crystal clear, I think!Today 11:28Surely it's all pretty straightforward?

1. the KRG opposed the appointment of Jeremy Asher and John Bell to the board last July. Their views were expressed in the RNS issued by Simon Murray shortly after his appointment to the position of Chairman.

2. the KRG have now let it be known publicly that certain board members had been involved in what appears to be an attempt to sell Gulf Keystone Petroleum to a predator at a price that does not reflect the value of the assets, the KRG somehow found out about this and told Simon Murray, who had it investigated.

3. Simon Murray and Andrew Simon (Gulf's Senior Independent Director) flew to Erbil two weekends ago and discussed what action to take with the KRG.

4. Simon Murray and Andrew Simon flew back to London, held a board meeting on the Tuesday, at which Jeremy Asher and John Bell were removed by the board in accordance with the company's bye-laws. Thomas Shull then resigned the following day.

5. the KRG does not appoint directors to the boards of publicly listed companies (at least, those in which it is not a direct shareholder: in which circumstance it would be perfectly able to do so if it so wished). But the KRG has certain criteria regarding what qualifies a company to be an Operator of a Production Sharing Contract and a participant of a PSC. These aspects were discussed at some length at the trial, in the context of Excalibur's failure to qualify as a potential participant of a PSC because of its failure to meet a number of specific KRG requirements.

6. the KRG have now warned that if the shenanigans were to continue, they might then alter the PSC composition. This would mean that the current situation, in which Gulf and Texas have 54.4%, MOL has 13.6%, and the KRG has as a direct stake + Back In Rights of 32% (I believe these numbers are broadly correct) would be changed, so that the Gulf + Texas percentage would go down from the 54.4%, in return for a bigger payment per barrel to Gulf, and the KRG's percentage would correspondingly go up.

7. by transferring (say) 24.4% of the current Gulf share of the PSC into a higher payment per barrel, with a consequent reduction in the percentage of the PSC, the new PSC composition (on this hypothetical example) could then be:

KRG 56.4%
Gulf + Texas 30%
MOL 13.6%
Total above = 100%

8. the KRG could then take over operatorship, and bring in a new operator to act on its behalf. Gulf would cease to be operator, because of a combination of minority PSC stake and also possible unsuitability, and it would become a non-operating minority partner.

Such potential moves were hardly difficult to predict...

But it seems that some would be 'movers and shakers' failed to think it through.

You can't fight City Hall!

niceonecyril - 07 Jul 2014 10:08 - 4954 of 5505

Down 5%(8%max)3 nillion traded,so no great sell off.10 days ti the AGM,after which we can get to some sort of normality?

niceonecyril - 10 Jul 2014 08:40 - 4955 of 5505


KRG Notice To All Crude Oil Buyers From SOMO

WED, 9 JUL 2014 20:55 | KRG.org




Erbil, Kurdistan (MNR.KRG.org) - Under Article 112 of the Iraqi Constitution, the Iraqi federal government is legally required to distribute oil and gas revenues from present fields “in a fair manner in proportion to the population distribution in all parts of the country.”

Under Article 112, the KRG is entitled to 17% of all proceeds from oil sales by the Federal Oil Ministry and the State Oil Marketing Organisation (SOMO) (or any other division of the Iraqi federal government).

The KRG has the right, in circumstances where the Iraqi federal government is not sharing revenues in accordance with the Iraqi Constitution, to take such action as the KRG considers appropriate to obtain all entitlements the Iraqi federal government is required to pay to the KRG under the Iraqi Constitution. This right is reflected in Kurdistan law.

Since at least 2005, the Federal Oil Ministry has failed to comply with its constitutional and legal duties to the KRG, including under Article 112. The Federal Oil Ministry and SOMO continue to sell and to seek to sell oil, gas and other petroleum products to third parties, and to retain the full proceeds of such sales, all in violation of the KRG’s express constitutional and legal rights, and without the participation or approval of the KRG.

In these circumstances, and until further notice, Article 112 legally precludes the Federal Oil Ministry and SOMO (or any other division of the Iraqi federal government) from selling oil from Iraq without the approval of the Kurdistan Region, as a producing Region. Oil sales by the Federal Oil Ministry, SOMO, or any other division of the Iraqi federal government are therefore in violation of the Iraqi Constitution and international law, and may be outside the scope of their authority.

The KRG notifies all persons that have purchased or may purchase oil or gas from any division of the Iraqi federal government, including the Federal Oil Ministry or SOMO, that the KRG will consider such buyers and those who have facilitated shipments on their behalf or on behalf of SOMO as colluding in, supporting, or facilitating violations of the KRG’s rights (including under the Iraqi Constitution and/or international law), unless such buyers pay the KRG 17% of the purchase price, reflecting the share to which the KRG is legally entitled.

Buyers who fail to make such payments to the KRG will be facilitating the Iraqi federal government’s breach of the KRG’s rights and passing to the Iraqi federal government monies that rightfully belong to the KRG. Such buyers will also run the risk of paying funds to the Iraqi federal government pursuant to arrangements that may be outside the authority of the Iraqi federal government under the Iraqi constitution.

The KRG will take such legal action against buyers of oil from the Federal Oil Ministry and SOMO (or any other division of the Iraqi federal government) as may be necessary to protect the KRG’s constitutional and legal rights.
Http://www.krg.org/a/d.aspx?s=040000&l=12&a=51847

niceonecyril - 13 Jul 2014 11:22 - 4957 of 5505



The US has given Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki a two-week ultimatum to leave his post and allow Iraq’s political parties to resume the formation of a new government.

Reports from Washington claim that there will be a US National Security council meeting in the near future, regarding the future of Maliki and finding a suitable replacement.

The Obama administration has allegedly talked and convinced former Iraqi Defense Minister Abdul-Qadir al-Obaidi to return to Iraq and talk to the Sunni leaders about joining the new Iraqi government.

Al-Obaidi, an Iraqi Sunni was Defense Ministry during Saddam Hussein’s era and was the Defense Minister of Iraq from 2006 to 2010.

Since he left his post Al-Obaidi has lived in Washington and has obtained US citizenship. He has good relations with US officials as well as Sunni leaders who are currently against Maliki’s government and supporting the militia groups who are fighting Iraqi army.

Meanwhile, local Iraqi media reports that through its embassy in Baghdad the White House is in talks with Iraqi Shiite leaders, Ammar Al Hakim, head of the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq and Influential Iraqi Shia cleric, Muqtada al-Sadr to find a Shiite replacements for the Iraqi Prime Minister post and replace Maliki.

Http://basnews.com/en/News/Details/US-working-to-find-Maliki-replacement/26569

------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Senior officials from US Department of State have urged Iraqi Kurds to cooperate with Iraq’ s federal government and form a united government as soon as possible.

On Thursday, Kurdistan region President Massoud Barzani met with United States Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Brett McGurk and a senior delegation from the State Department in Erbil and talked about the current Iraqi crisis.

According to the official website of the Kurdistan Region President Barzani told US officials on Thursday that they won’t abandon plans of achieving Kurdish rights and will continue to work towards them.

Sources close to the matter, told BasNews that McGurk has asked Barzani to give one more chance to Baghdad and if this doe not work, they can choose their destiny.

After recent developments in Iraq and attacks by the Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (ISIS) on Mosul and other Sunni cities in the region, the Peshmerga took control of Iraq’s disputed territories, raising talks of Kurdish independence.

BasNews has learned that McGurk allegedly said that if the Iraqi government didn’t succeeded then KRG has the rights to choose their path and US won’t block any decision the Kurds take regarding their region.

Washington has continually urged Kurds to remain part of Iraq and form the new government as soon as possible, as the division between Baghdad and Erbil continues to widen.

Http://basnews.com/en/News/Details/US-officials-to-Barzani--Give-lraq-one-last-chance-/26603

niceonecyril - 14 Jul 2014 20:02 - 4958 of 5505

A realistic post from another board(AGM thursday).


GKP do normally release an Operational Update on the morning of the AGM. This should contain a production update although I wouldn't expect anything dramatic as the previously announced SH1 & 3 workovers should be ongoing with the slack taken up by the other producers. Maybe something interesting on PF2. The only SP driver here would be anything above guidance which is a slow ramp up to 40k by year end.

We could see progress on SA3 numbers, maybe something on Shaikan connectivity.

What I am really hoping for is an OWC figure from SH7 which could give us indication of a CPR upgrade. That would be a real driver for the SP.

Just guessing again of course but the company really do need to brighten the future a little what with all the negativity.
Cheers

niceonecyril - 16 Jul 2014 09:25 - 4959 of 5505

AGM tomorrow,hopefully an op's RNS?

niceonecyril - 17 Jul 2014 08:02 - 4960 of 5505

No RNS this am,disappointing although still time before the AGM ??

gibby - 17 Jul 2014 11:19 - 4961 of 5505

great news tk out - will smash the £1

cynic - 17 Jul 2014 11:30 - 4962 of 5505

that had already been telegraphed some weeks back, but yes i thoroughly agree that GKP is well shot of that cowboy

VICTIM - 17 Jul 2014 11:44 - 4963 of 5505

He hasn't gone , he's not on the Board.

niceonecyril - 17 Jul 2014 12:09 - 4964 of 5505



Simon Fisher @simonfishybits · 36s
Update from John Gerstenluer bad day producing 21k good day producing 25k

niceonecyril - 17 Jul 2014 12:11 - 4965 of 5505


Simon Fisher @simonfishybits · 18s
Pending projects
SH3 spur line 24"
blending plant
drilling schedule
PF3 5 wells
SH7 deep drill SH6 sidetrack

panto - 17 Jul 2014 12:18 - 4966 of 5505

Back in @ 93p

Intraday retracement done from the high of 96p


Board changes at Gulf Keystone Petroleum

Gulf Keystone Petroleum (LSE: GKP) has announced that Todd Kozel has decided to stand down from the Board and not to accept the previously announced role of executive director after retiring as chief executive officer.

As such, Mr Kozel declined to seek re-election to the Board at the company's Annual General Meeting today. Mr Kozel will stay on as an officer of the group.

Mark Hanson is also retiring from his role as a non-executive director at the Annual General Meeting.


Chart.aspx?Provider=Intra&Main=MainArea&

niceonecyril - 17 Jul 2014 12:21 - 4967 of 5505

0 0

Simon Fisher @simonfishybits · 8s
#GKP have a very good relationship with the KRG changes to the BOD are welcomed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Simon Fisher @simonfishybits · 1m
Simon Murray tells us that we have the best asset in Kurdistan b

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Simon Fisher @simonfishybits · 57s
Gramacho questions quoting AIM rules to oil well RNSs
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Simon Fisher @simonfishybits · 1m
Gramacho v John Gerstenaluer the battle is on SH6 debate
Inconclusive tests results
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Simon Fisher @simonfishybits · 1m

#GKP are in a closed period & that's the reason why the directors have not bought any sharesAndrew Simon said he will buying soon

niceonecyril - 17 Jul 2014 12:24 - 4968 of 5505

hTtp://gkpinvestor.proboards.com/page/twitter_page

gibby - 17 Jul 2014 12:41 - 4969 of 5505

victim - yep tk makes the tea now :-)

niceonecyril - 17 Jul 2014 22:10 - 4970 of 5505

HTTP://www.gulfkeystone.com/investor-centre/events-financial-calendar


Interims on the 28thAUGEST.

panto - 18 Jul 2014 09:16 - 4971 of 5505

from the Telegraph

By Harriet Dennys, City Diary Editor , 18 Jul 2014

Gulf Keystone’s announcement that its controversial figurehead, Todd Kozel, will step down as CEO but remain an “officer” of the Iraq-focused oil company came as no surprise to one investor.

This was the exact plan he had presented to a source close to the Gulf board more than two months ago.

In an email seen by Diary, said shareholder suggested heading off “potential trouble” by appointing Kozel to “a new position at Gulf, which would allow him to continue as the key liaison with the Kurdistan Regional Government”. “That way, he would no longer be the CEO, but the relationship with the KRG would be maintained,” said the source.

This cunning plan would indeed allow Gulf’s board to have their cake and eat it, as yesterday’s confirmation proved.
No doubt the cheque’s in the post.

niceonecyril - 18 Jul 2014 11:41 - 4972 of 5505



jonnib,

From i i i,


Re: SH6

opulentia [Interactive Investor client]
11UP
Good Morning GKP,rs

Gramachos, main question focused on AIM rule 11, which apparently states (not read it in full),
why was there no mention of water in the RNS,s that where released in reference to SH6 RNS,s

Gram, read out Rule 11, which states all liquids should be mentioned,

John, replied that it wasnt the policy to release "The Raw Data" appertaining to fluids noted in the findings, as they where minimal?.
Gram , pressed him further regarding the water in the logs, but john insisted that the water was minimal and in his interpretation the water was mainly from fluids used in the drilling process,
he went on to say that 350,000 Barrels of drilling fluids went into SH6 , and it was normal for some of these fluids to be in the "Raw Data,"
Sahara (oilmans wife) further press John G, by asking " can you categorically say that the water/fluids ? where that from the drilling ops, which John replied , YES! i can , he also went on to say that at the time time of the test the well flowed "Full Oil Flow" ,

Gram , wasn't convinced, and pressed again, most of it went over everyone's head , unless you where a Geologist, it was interesting, but i think the Company reported the facts as they saw fit at the time,

Tony Pearl also reported that before any RNS,s was ever released it goes in front of the Legal Team, and also the independent oil analysts (cant remember who they where at this time, its on the GKP site) for confirmation of being a proper account of being fit and proper for release,

that's about as much as i can remember, for now, and my own interpretation of what was said in between all the Technical stuff.

from my point of view JG answered the questions comprehensively enough , Simon Murray said that if Gram, wished to continue with the debate regarding the water contact, etc, he could discuss this further after the meeting with John, i don't know if he took up this offer,

From my position, yes it was good to bring the questions up, but we just seemed to be going round in circles,and putting more negative spin on news that has been rinsed and repeated before!

GLA LTH some other snippets to follow, from the da
Register now or login to post to this thread.