Proselenes
- 16 Nov 2010 00:46
.
TopAnalyst
- 01 Apr 2011 17:34
- 522 of 705
I am removing ALL my research from here due to the constant personal abuse, defamation and distortions of it posted by:
ptholden
hlyeo98
halifax
blackdown
kimoldfield
cynic
This bunch of abusive retards is the reason MoneyAM will NEVER have a forum worth reading.
I have reported them to support by they do nothing, either because they want to force me to PAY them for the Traders Room or because they are too lazy to do anything. Maybe the people in support are the ones perpetrating the abuse, so as to force people to pay for the premium boards. Either way the service is sh1te and a disgrace to the finance industry. No wonder there is nobody left here apart from morons.
I will continue posting my good research on boards that are run in accordance with FSA and LSE listing rules and the interests of the market, not here where ar5eh0les rule the boards and all decent research is buried under their piles of sh1te.
ptholden
- 01 Apr 2011 18:50
- 523 of 705
"A jet pump will take pressure from 300 psi to 'circa' 1200 psi which is 4x."
Correct
"Theory based on the above says they can multiply WF-9 total production by 'circa' 4x, which would give:
Zone 2: 80bopd x4 = 320 bopd"
Wrong
Suugest you research jet performance curves, increasing the pressure 4 fold does not increase output 4 fold, der.
ptholden
- 01 Apr 2011 19:19
- 524 of 705
"Crosby Warren in the presentation states 50 bopd with fracing potential for 15x this, which is 750 bopd"
Lol - Wrong
What EOG actually said was:
'Consequently, a repeat frac stimulation presents an opportunity to significantly increase field production. The original frac was highly successful and led to a 15 fold increase in production rate.'
EOG does not claim a repeat frac will increase production by 15 fold.
kimoldfield
- 01 Apr 2011 19:27
- 525 of 705
TA, MCap merely tells you what a company is worth on paper. A worthless way of measuring potential/profitabilty! What I want to know is what the EOG share price should be in comparison with the amount of oil pulled out of the ground. At present it would seem that, compared to AFR's sp EOG should be priced at around max 0.00758p per share in the true sense of things.
I know that is a very inaccurate way to work out what the sp should be because it does not take into account any costs or price of oil etc but at present I cannot make any sense out of the sp, other than possible potential is propping it up. Of course that can also be said of any exploration company.
ptholden
- 01 Apr 2011 19:32
- 526 of 705
Gazillions profits
Oh dear - wrong again.
For this financial year Aug 2010 - Jul 2011, EOG have stated production of 151 bopd for the first six months which is equivalent to 27459bopd * 38.86 = 1066707.
It doesn't appear 2011 is going to be much better and although they haven't stated a figure for Jan - Mar it's reasonable to assume from the operational update, a similar 150bopd. So add on 533353, which equals a net revenue thus far of 1.6m.
Even if they manage to ramp up production to 500 bopd (which they won't) for the last three months of the financial year, total revenues will be in the region of 3.35m.
No improvement on last year and how much will they have spent on the Firsby activity?
TopAnalyst
- 01 Apr 2011 20:53
- 527 of 705
I am removing ALL my research from here due to the constant personal abuse, defamation and distortions of it posted by:
ptholden
hlyeo98
halifax
blackdown
kimoldfield
cynic
This bunch of abusive retards is the reason MoneyAM will NEVER have a forum worth reading.
I have reported them to support by they do nothing, either because they want to force me to PAY them for the Traders Room or because they are too lazy to do anything. Maybe the people in support are the ones perpetrating the abuse, so as to force people to pay for the premium boards. Either way the service is sh1te and a disgrace to the finance industry. No wonder there is nobody left here apart from morons.
I will continue posting my good research on boards that are run in accordance with FSA and LSE listing rules and the interests of the market, not here where ar5eh0les rule the boards and all decent research is buried under their piles of sh1te.
TopAnalyst
- 01 Apr 2011 20:54
- 528 of 705
I am removing ALL my research from here due to the constant personal abuse, defamation and distortions of it posted by:
ptholden
hlyeo98
halifax
blackdown
kimoldfield
cynic
This bunch of abusive retards is the reason MoneyAM will NEVER have a forum worth reading.
I have reported them to support by they do nothing, either because they want to force me to PAY them for the Traders Room or because they are too lazy to do anything. Maybe the people in support are the ones perpetrating the abuse, so as to force people to pay for the premium boards. Either way the service is sh1te and a disgrace to the finance industry. No wonder there is nobody left here apart from morons.
I will continue posting my good research on boards that are run in accordance with FSA and LSE listing rules and the interests of the market, not here where ar5eh0les rule the boards and all decent research is buried under their piles of sh1te.
kimoldfield
- 02 Apr 2011 00:02
- 529 of 705
TA, I have been valuing companies most of my life and I could write a very clued up book on the subject; sadly I do not have the time to write it so I'm afraid I will not be able to help you out!
I have read and re-read the broker valuation and the only thing that seems to stand out is that finnCap Limited, as the Nominated advisor and broker, is hardly likely to say "this company is worth Jack Shit". Statements such as "As a result, we believe a successful drilling programme could trigger a material re-rating as the potential value of these assets becomes more apparent than in the past." and "The broker believes that high impact appraisal drilling on the Barchiz and Voitinel-Solca discoveries in Romania provides material upside potential in 2011. If results are positive it expects both projects to move rapidly into development, significantly boosting Europas reported reserves." are as useful as a chocolate teapot. They might as well, more pertinently, say "If EOG do not find oil or gas, they will go bankrupt."
To state the obvious, potential is worth nothing until it becomes reality. The company is valued on supposition, ifs and maybes. Until it is able to produce a meaningful quantity of oil or gas I'm afraid the company is worth what the house broker cannot say, "Jack Shit". Yes, ok, the same can be said for an awful lot of companies out there today.
However I have no wish to strike up an argument with you, we both have our opinions and I respect that. I sincerely hope that EOG will strike a huge amount of the black stuff, or gas, I might then consider investing. Until then I will be steering well clear.
I wish you well with your investment.
cynic
- 02 Apr 2011 08:42
- 530 of 705
kim - you must be the almost the only one who does respect TA's opinion, though i note your opinion of his judgement is shared by nearly all!
"potential is worth nothing until it becomes reality" ...... iyo, does that also apply to say BAO who have yet to get anything out of the ground, or do you accept (semi)proven deposits have a (good) value?
kimoldfield
- 02 Apr 2011 09:36
- 531 of 705
Cynic, "or do you accept (semi)proven deposits have a (good) value?" I don't know that it is good value but sure, I accept that, with the proviso that an investment would be very speculative at this stage. BAO is about minerals not oil so it is easier to quantify what they may have in the ground. Getting it out is another matter!
TopAnalyst
- 02 Apr 2011 20:24
- 532 of 705
I am removing ALL my research from here due to the constant personal abuse, defamation and distortions of it posted by:
ptholden
hlyeo98
halifax
blackdown
kimoldfield
cynic
This bunch of abusive retards is the reason MoneyAM will NEVER have a forum worth reading.
I have reported them to support by they do nothing, either because they want to force me to PAY them for the Traders Room or because they are too lazy to do anything. Maybe the people in support are the ones perpetrating the abuse, so as to force people to pay for the premium boards. Either way the service is sh1te and a disgrace to the finance industry. No wonder there is nobody left here apart from morons.
I will continue posting my good research on boards that are run in accordance with FSA and LSE listing rules and the interests of the market, not here where ar5eh0les rule the boards and all decent research is buried under their piles of sh1te.
Toya
- 02 Apr 2011 20:41
- 533 of 705
TA - that is a great idea for a book, website, and ISBN lol!
kimoldfield
- 03 Apr 2011 00:53
- 534 of 705
Oh dear! TA, get a grip you idiot!!!! I did give you a chance but I now have to pronounce you dunce of the century. I have more knowledge in my little finger than you have in your overinflated brain. You sunshine, are the biggest fucking moron I have ever come across. I cannot believe that I am even responding to your sad tirade! At no point have I "bashed" the stock other than to put across a sane and sensible point that until there is a proven, viable and flowing volume of oil/gas EOG is a VERY speculative punt.
I hope it works out for you because I wish you no harm or loss of all your capital, but until then Screw you!
kimoldfield
- 03 Apr 2011 01:01
- 535 of 705
Oh, by the way, I think it would be in your best interest to rename yourself 'ShitAnalyst'.
I won't squelch you because I like a good laugh.
kimoldfield
- 03 Apr 2011 01:14
- 536 of 705
And another "by the way", I notice that you hide behind anonymity. That always makes me wonder what the anonymous person's game is all about.
kimoldfield
- 03 Apr 2011 01:54
- 537 of 705
I apologize if my language has offended anyone, other that SA obviously, but I am sick and tired of the likes of 'it' (don't know whether 'it' is a him or her) trying to dupe investors with speculative manure.
'It' can't see this as I have been squelched. I can stand as guilty for being upbeat on certain stocks, eg SEO, now BIOM: that was based on information provided by the company on actual trials, later on I found that the trials were a disappointment and made it known that it was so. There you go, maybe I am not squeaky clean because of that but I certainly do not think of myself as a con merchant. I hate con merchants. I hope SA isn't a con merchant. I wouldn't like to hate him/her/it.
kimoldfield
- 03 Apr 2011 02:00
- 538 of 705
Sh*t! I can't believe that I have just put up 4 posts because of inane ramblings by TA/SA!!!!!
Oh bwger, that's 5 now!
;o)
cynic
- 03 Apr 2011 07:48
- 539 of 705
ROTFL! ...... welcome to the naughty step kim, for you're in good company, though i'm afraid mistress t is far far too well behaved to be sent there .... perhaps she's forgotten how to be naughty!
Toya
- 03 Apr 2011 08:26
- 540 of 705
Good morning Cynic - I've enjoyed the hurling of insults here - all very amusing though I couldn't get so worked up about other people's comments, which leads me to conclude that you must all be a bunch of macho, possibly rather bored (but not boring!) guys (certainly not girls!). As for naughty - I'm not quite sure I know what you mean ;)
kimoldfield
- 03 Apr 2011 10:52
- 541 of 705
Aw c'mon Toya, say something rude! We could do with some naughty ladies on The step. Mind you, we may have to build an extension if TA carries on like this.
;o)