Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Rockhopper Exploration (RKH)     

markymar - 15 Aug 2005 15:14

Web Page Traffic Counter

http://www.falklands-oil.com/

http://www.rockhopperexploration.co.uk

http://www.argosresources.com/




Rockhopper was established in 2004 with a strategy to invest in and undertake an offshore oil exploration programme in the North Falkland Basin. It was floated on AIM in August 2005. Rockhopper was the first company to make a commercial oil discovery in the Falklands. Today Rockhopper is the largest acreage holder in the North Falkland Basin, with interests in the Greater Mediterranean region.




free counters

Proselenes - 22 Dec 2011 00:16 - 5618 of 6294

Now I agree with that. Which is why the big boys will, IMO, wait until BOR and FOGL have finished drilling before deciding to get involved or not.

Do you want to upset the whole of South America for 400 million barrels ?

Or you wait and see, and then perhaps upset them by getting involved for 4 billion barrels, for which the profits are vast and nobody will care about the upset caused.

This is why the key for the future is whether BOR/FOGL strike oil. If they do, in the big sizes - then development is not only safe but majors will start getting involved.


greekman - 21 Dec 2011 15:54 - 5611 of 5617
Due to the Argentinian problem, small though it may be, it cant be ignored..

cynic - 22 Dec 2011 08:23 - 5619 of 6294

i think you're grasping at straws re FOGL and BOR ...... if RKH really have found good and commercial quantities of oil, then sooner or later they will be bought out, though i accept the premium is likely to be greater if other decent fields are found in the area

aldwickk - 22 Dec 2011 09:03 - 5620 of 6294

Chile helped us during the Falkland's war , is it to far for our ship's to dock in ?

avsec - 22 Dec 2011 10:42 - 5621 of 6294

Any concession to Argentina will be seen as a relaxation of the British position on the FIs - which is one of self-determination.

Unlke Brazil Argentina is virtually bankrupt and has neither the capability for armed conflict nor the financial reserves. Chile is still a thorn in her side and, despite Britain's best efforts to alienate the country (Pinochet?), remains an ally.

Not sure why we want to dock ships in Chile Aldwickk. Mare harbour is fine for support vessels, large ships can use Stanley and Berkely Sound has been surveyed for just such work. It can take rigs etc but lacks the on-shore facilities at present.

Argentina will continue to rattle sabres and attempt to gain sway amongst neighbours but IMHO that will be all.

Let's face it - IF ( and it is a big 'if') a global producer decides to buy in, their immense clout will ensure that things happen quickly.

markymar - 22 Dec 2011 12:20 - 5622 of 6294

I see Discussion continued regarding potential Port locations........ Members agreed that three sites only should be considered for further investigation - Navy Point (Port William), FIPASS and Mare Harbour.

cynic - 22 Dec 2011 14:15 - 5623 of 6294

aldo - glad geography is to be made compulsory to 16!

avsec - 22 Dec 2011 14:32 - 5624 of 6294

Navy Point is fine (lived there for a while!) but has limited hinterland and road access, FIPASS has the adjacent area to expand and has exisitng dock areas that are readily accesible to Stanley. Mare Harbour is very close to the MP airport for personnel transfers and also has space for expansion.

aldwickk - 22 Dec 2011 15:15 - 5625 of 6294

Cynic

Were else is the nearest friendly South American country ?

cynic - 22 Dec 2011 16:28 - 5626 of 6294

there are surely countries on east coast that are not attached to mercosur and therefore do not entail sailing around cape horn

halifax - 22 Dec 2011 16:52 - 5627 of 6294

the mercosur ban is only affecting falkland islands flagged vessels so what is the "flap" about, ever heard of "flags of convenience"?

cynic - 22 Dec 2011 16:56 - 5628 of 6294

you're right and there areften ways around these things with covert cooperation, even if argentina itelf is ruled out for domestic political reasons

avsec - 23 Dec 2011 10:28 - 5629 of 6294

Just to make Proselene happy over Christmas
Falklands invaded!

With modern shipping there is no need to call at ports in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay. Adequate fuel oil is available in the Falklands and in Ascension if required.
As Halifax points out the ban only refers to Falkland Island registered ships - however Argentina has banned all ships going to or from the Falklands. To my mind a shot in the foot by Argentina because the busy tourist trade to Antarctica, South Georgia and the Falklands is increasingly being serviced by Chile or via Stanley! This year is one of the busiest years of tourism for the region.

required field - 23 Dec 2011 11:57 - 5630 of 6294

Going by the graph : is this about to jump up to 300p ?......might be about to, at long last ?.

required field - 23 Dec 2011 11:59 - 5631 of 6294

I think this is about ready to surge !....300p here we come perhaps...

required field - 23 Dec 2011 12:04 - 5632 of 6294

Like a recoiled spring....

chav - 23 Dec 2011 12:15 - 5633 of 6294

Virtually all of the Falklands flagged ships are fishing boats, mainly Spanish, therefore the shipping issue with Argentina doesn't pose any real problem with the Oil Expo side of things, because they don't need to use S. America.

The shipping ban is a huge problem for the fishing industry though because they use Montevideo for laying up the fishing boats out of season and a lot of fish gets transhipped though the container network there.

Apart from the fishing fleet there are 3 local ships, fishery patrol and inter island cargo ship which are under the Falklands register and the shipping ban poses a problem for them in the form of dry docking facilites...normally they are drydocked either in Montevideo or Punta Arenas...all three went to Punta during this last year.

mnamreh - 30 Dec 2011 07:10 - 5634 of 6294

.

Proselenes - 30 Dec 2011 07:50 - 5635 of 6294

Looks like the coring was not exciting - nothing said about it at all, perhaps why this RNS is dumped on a half day before the holiday ?

Thats it then, next RNS is rig off hire and demob paid for - then thats it for drilling in the north for a long time.

Exploration excitement moves south, to BOR and FOGL.

cynic - 30 Dec 2011 08:18 - 5636 of 6294

given that sp is slightly stronger, i should imagine it found out all that it needed to and was as much a cheap exercise to complete their obligations - as the rns implies - than anything else

HARRYCAT - 30 Dec 2011 09:11 - 5637 of 6294

StockMarketWire.com
Rockhopper Exploration has confirmed that coring and logging operations at well 14/15-4z have been successfully completed.

The sidetrack well 14/15-4z (approximately 12.5m from the main well bore), was drilled to a total depth of 2555m md. A total 115m of core was cut through the hydrocarbon bearing Beverley, Casper South, Casper and Sea Lion reservoirs bringing the total amount of core cut during the entire drilling campaign to 455m (1493ft).

Drilling of the well has completed the commitments required to earn the 60% interest and operatorship of licence PL004b. The well will now be plugged and abandoned as planned and a further announcement will be issued when the rig is off hire.
Register now or login to post to this thread.