goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
hewittalan6
- 08 Mar 2007 07:40
- 5778 of 81564
Once again I find I have been given a different script to the rest of the planet......so it is time for a rant. Out comes the soap box.
There a loads of good reasons for banning smoking in public. The health of non smokers is not one of them. No study has ever been able to show a significant causal link between health and passive smoking. Ever.
Yet on 1st July GB becomes smoke free.
At the same time a report today calls for a shake up of the drugs laws. It calls for many drugs to be legalised and for public money to build shooting galleries where users can go to take drugs, be it smoking pot or mainlining heroin. In the same report it classes tobacco and alcohol as dangerous drugs, but does not offer to build smoking shelters. Slight duality of thought there, perhaps.
It also calls for addicts to be GIVEN, as part of their rehabilitation, houses and jobs.
In summary, legal and government sponsored substances are being demonised while illegal, criminal sponsored substances are being cannonised, promoted and the lifestyles of those who choose to use them (and by extension the suppliers) being subsidised.
If the report were written by the triads or yardies I would not be suprised.
My head hurts.
Alan
scotty 77
- 08 Mar 2007 13:26
- 5779 of 81564
Tobacco certainly is being demonised.
I heard it said that if smoking "behind the bikesheds" was not so "bad" then perhaps drugs may not have caught on to the degree they have.
I await the time when alcohol is similarly treated
Then of course there is the taxation raising issue
kimoldfield
- 08 Mar 2007 13:31
- 5780 of 81564
Scotty, you mentioned the t.x....n word, I have come out in a rash and a cold sweat!
ptholden
- 11 Mar 2007 23:44
- 5782 of 81564
aw thanks Bos :)
(How did you know it was my birthday?)
bosley
- 12 Mar 2007 10:22
- 5783 of 81564
i know everything, gorgeous ;)
(might see you wednesday, all things being equal and everyfink. )
hewittalan6
- 12 Mar 2007 16:10
- 5784 of 81564
Just thought i'd come on here where it is slightly more sane and high brow.
Many happy returns to Boz jnr.
1 year already, eh? The 3am trips to collect 'em from a nightclub will be here afore ye know it.
alan
chocolat
- 12 Mar 2007 19:35
- 5785 of 81564
Well, if the naughty step doesn't work
you'll know what to do, Bos ;)
kimoldfield
- 13 Mar 2007 01:27
- 5786 of 81564
Viagra is now available in liquid form. FDA officials today announced the release of the wonder drug, Viagra, in a new, easy-to-take liquid form. It is sold under the pharmaceutical name "Mydixadud." Now, when a man comes home from work in the evening, he can pour himself a stiff one.
greekman
- 13 Mar 2007 07:56
- 5787 of 81564
This is for those on the SEO thread who asked a question about none hygienic ammo.
OK I have to explain re hygienic bullets (sorry to go off SEO track but it is interesting) for many years I was involved with firearms.
In training we used what was referred to as Dirty Ammo, which was cheaper due to it being re-loads. Ammo such as this if used on live targets can cause deaths due to contaminates even if the ballistic wound was by itself not a mortal wound.
This happens many times in wars. Infections from DA take hold very quickly.
In a live situation we used clean ammo, which obviously kills efficiently but targets don't die of infections so often.
So now you know.
Once again I apologize re going off thread.
hewittalan6
- 13 Mar 2007 08:00
- 5788 of 81564
Couldn't they just coat the dirty ammo in penecillin????
I always wanted to invent a Paxo bullet, so I could kill chickens and stuff them at the same time.
kimoldfield
- 13 Mar 2007 08:03
- 5789 of 81564
If you could adapt that to a nuclear bullet Alan, you could cook the chicken as well.
hewittalan6
- 13 Mar 2007 08:06
- 5790 of 81564
Kim, we got a business plan far advanced of SEO's.
I suggest a floatation of around 40 per share to produce depleted uranium / paxo bullets for Bernard Matthews. With Bird Flu around as well, we should clean up.
Bluelady
- 13 Mar 2007 08:27
- 5791 of 81564
The beneficiary side effect after haven eaten such a chicken is that the humans start glowing and therefore do not need to switch on lights. This will reduce global warming.
kimoldfield
- 13 Mar 2007 08:52
- 5792 of 81564
Who needs vast, expensive organizations to sort out global warming when it can be done on the NOWT thread?
greekman
- 13 Mar 2007 08:53
- 5793 of 81564
OK I should have known this would start the budding Monty Python script writers off.
Alan,
You have made a mistake, surely you mean Paxo Bullets for the turkeys, not for the man himself (Paxo Bullets for Bernard Mathews), but there again.
It puts a new slant (Paxo Bullets) on the saying, "Wait till you see the whites of their eyes".
But perhaps I should not go there.
kimoldfield
- 13 Mar 2007 08:59
- 5794 of 81564
GM. I think the saying should be slightly amended to "Wait till you see the whites of their eggs".
bhunt1910
- 13 Mar 2007 09:56
- 5795 of 81564
Kim - just saw an earlier post of yours where you talked about paying 25 commission ? I did not think anyone paid that these days. Try Barclays - 7.50 if you are a frequent trader - 12.50 if not - and they have I think an excellent on line dealing service.
hewittalan6
- 13 Mar 2007 10:00
- 5796 of 81564
Thinking about it, we have the entire new environmentally friendly sunday lunch at our disposal.
Paxo bullets for the chickens, drop cluster bombs on potato fields to create lots of hot and creamy mash, replace the napalm in flamethrowers with Bisto and suddenly the anti war brigade and the global warming set are happy.
If the animal rights lot don't like it we can always employ ex US marines to shoot the chickens. They will almost certainly miss and shoot each other, but they will not die of lead poisoning.
Time to ring George W. and tell him he has tried "Hearts and Minds" and "Shock and Awe", and they failed. He should now try "Meat and two veg".
This is easy. What do we pay politicians so much for??
Alan
kimoldfield
- 13 Mar 2007 10:46
- 5797 of 81564
Baz, thanks for that. I know 25 sounds a lot but I have now negotiated a lower rate with NatWest Stockbrokers, plus the link with my current account at NatWest is beneficial so I will probably stick with them for now for my bigger deals.
Alan, there is no way I would let George W. get his hands on my meat and two veg!