grajul
- 19 Feb 2004 13:39
Hi all
pretty new to all this. I have pumped some into Deltex - looks like a strong product with good growth. Could be a steady gainer.
Does anyone else have this, and anyone have some research on it? Someone with more experience than me!
thanks in advance.
Grajul
greekman
- 05 Dec 2008 16:30
- 588 of 968
OK I give up attempting to read this share. Down today over 12%.
In the present market I find I have about as much chance of reading where the sp is heading as my wife does reading a map.
2517GEORGE
- 05 Dec 2008 19:37
- 589 of 968
Shame to give up yesterday's gains albeit on low volume, but better times lay ahead for DEMG I'm sure. As for reading the sp of any company, I hold VGM, today the buy/sell ratio (taken at face value) was 80:1 and the sp dropped, so don't feel too bad about reading sp's wrongly, although it would help if your wife was a better map reader ha!ha! Mine is a mind reader, oops got to go she just asked who was I writing to about her ha! ha!
2517
greekman
- 07 Dec 2008 16:50
- 590 of 968
Thanks George,
Not worried about not being able to read sp's at the moment, just find it annoying.
Agree re better times for Deltex.
greekman
- 09 Dec 2008 12:01
- 591 of 968
According to todays Daily Telegraph, the NHS recorded a surplus last year of 2.1bn. The Department of Health stated that it was up to individual trusts to decide how the surplus would be used for the benefit of patients.
Just think 2,100,000,000.
Lets look at a couple of options.
Option A....Spend some of this on putting as many CardioQ,s as required in every hospital, leaving a huge amount to spend on other life saving technologies.
Option B....Spend all of it on plush new offices for the top heavy administration.
New carpets, expensive wallpaper, furniture perhaps.
And of course not forgetting all those extra overseas (I understand the Bahamas are nice this time of year) conferences that are essential for the understanding of these job worthies.
Call me a cynic (yes I know someone will) but option B looks a certain bet.
2517GEORGE
- 09 Dec 2008 12:30
- 592 of 968
Absolutely greekman, you don't expect this surplus to be frittered away on patient care do you, it's all about the feelgood factor, the hierarchy, not the patients. As for you being cynical, mmmm, you're probably no more cynical than me, anyway these bb's already have their own cynic whose posts are eagerly read by many of us. (I suspect there are a good many cynics out there in reality,and with good cause)
2517
greekman
- 14 Dec 2008 16:45
- 593 of 968
Surely this must be a catalyst as far as the CardioQ is for the UK market.
Found on another site.
The NHS are awaiting a report.
http://www.ncchta.org/project/1633.asp
Looks like Deltex CardioQ is/will lead the way as its easier an cheaper to use as well as (from all the data) the best performing.
Whilst I appreciate the powers that be have to have their own assessments, you would have thought all they would have needed to do was to collate and review all the ODM data that is already out there. Also you would have though all this should have been completed months, if not years ago.
Procrastination rules, yet again.
But we are still heading in the right direction, are we not.
With such assessments, the conclusion is never a sure bet.
greekman
- 19 Dec 2008 13:00
- 594 of 968
Re the above post.
The NHS are expecting a report.
Report updated, (but don't get excited) as all that has been updated is the date 17-12-08.
As the problem is re these reports, you can not get the earlier report once the site has been updated.
As I am keeping copies to compare, I will post any changes, in said reports.
Greek
greekman
- 07 Jan 2009 09:44
- 595 of 968
Nice steady tick up over last 5 trading day. Up 17% plus today on low volume. In the current markets I would have expected some pull back, by now on no news.
I am expecting a pre close trading statement soon as they released one last year. It was on the 23rd Jan. Can't see any reason not to release one this year, similar time.
Also, as the assessment on the CardioQ system by the NHS CENTRE FOR EVIDENCE-BASED PURCHASING (CEP) is due an update on 13th of this month timing could be perfect for a sp surge, obviously counting on a positive update that is but with 2 delays already, don't hold your breath. It does make you wonder why the NHS have to sit on this for so long, when all the evidence to prove evidence based purchase (positive) is literally starring them in the face. Just how much more evidence do these muppets need.
2517GEORGE
- 07 Jan 2009 10:27
- 596 of 968
Yes has improved nicely and despite saying I had enough I did a small top up on 31/12 that really is it now. I think this has the potential to go quite well in terms of the sp, like you say the evidence is there, it just needs to be recognised by the purse holders, and slowly but surely this is happening.
2517
greekman
- 07 Jan 2009 11:04
- 597 of 968
As I understand it although the powers that be (NHS Trusts) don't have to follow recommendations made by THE NHS CENTRE FOR EVIDENCE-BASED PURCHASING (CEP) they would find it very difficult to not follow the said recommendations, if it is shown that the product shows best value for money.
An interesting explanation re what they (CEP) do.
http://www.pasa.nhs.uk/PASAWeb/NHSprocurement/CEP
greekman
- 09 Jan 2009 08:32
- 598 of 968
Don't hold your breath.
The NHS (CEP) projects are listed in order of intended publication date, soonest first. There are 14 that have an intended publication date prior to the Deltex connected one. The project top of the list still has an intended publication date of early 2008. Yes that's not a typo error, 2008 is correct. So no doubt we will see many updates, where the only difference is yet another update due date. No wonder nothing ever gets done.
Pathetic or what.
Lets just hope that the list is juggled about a bit, if/when obstacles are overcome.
When the project is finally published, I will receive a full project report, so will post here.
If I live that long.
greekman
- 13 Jan 2009 17:29
- 599 of 968
NHS (CEP) update or not.
The only update is yet again another report estimated date, now being 20/01/09.
Due to the almost static none action by the above (still 14 projects with priority dates earlier than the CadioQ assessment) I have sent the following E-Mail to the NIHR.
I am conducting research on the workings of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme.
You state that, 'Projects are listed in order of intended publication date, soonest first. Followed by completed projects that do not require publication'.
Often these so called publication dates have passed. Please see example below which is the first project on your current list, which is still showing Estimated Publication date of Early 2008. As it is now 2009 how can this estimated date still be relevant. This gives the impression that proposed dates are just churned over, with no real information of progress. If estimated publication dates are up to 12 months out, what's the point of publishing said estimated dates.
Example..This is the first on the list.
Docetaxel for the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. HTA Ref: 05/53/01.
Research Type: NICE Evidence Review Group Report (ERG).
(ERG report received)
Estimated publication date in Supplement to the HTA journal series: Early 2008.
END.
I will no longer post info re this unless there IS an update of any relevance.
I will of course post any reply from my e-mail (don't hold your breath as I am not expecting one).
The CardioQ project was first looked at by the above in March 2007. This just goes to show the huge huddles that Deltex have to overcome.
Slow, slow stop should be the motto of the NIHR.
2517GEORGE
- 13 Jan 2009 18:26
- 600 of 968
Sadly this is an all too common occurrence these days, in as much as people in prominent positions gladly keep taking the money and do diddley squat for it, some MP's, bankers, the social services and the NHS, to name just a few. I look forward to reading any reply you may get greekman, course the danger is if they do respond to your e-mail it will put the update back another 12 months.
I hasten to add there are a good many very hard working people in the occupations above, it just seems to be the decision makers who are not up to the task.
2517
greekman
- 14 Jan 2009 10:15
- 601 of 968
Fully agree. Plenty of hard working indians, with even more none productive chiefs.
But as long as failure or/and none productivity is rewarded, nothing will change.
greekman
- 20 Jan 2009 10:34
- 602 of 968
NIHR HTA programme up date.
It appears that although the next stated update from the last (13/01/09) was to be today, but for some reason an update was published on 16/01/09.
The good news is the project at the top of the list now has a estimated publish date of Jan 2009, whereas a few weeks ago such dates were Jan 2008, so somewhat out of date (I would like to think my e-mail giving a diplomatic kick up the ass did it, but I doubt it very much).
The point is since the 13th, seven projects have been published leaving Deltex Cardio now 8th on the projected publishing timescale (from 14th a week ago).
Might not mean much but at least their (Deltex) project is moving nearer the top in priority.
Will post further update after market close tonight.
Hope I'm not going to deep re this (boring) but I feel the result of this project research paper will be a main catalyst in the take up of the Cardio system in the UK.
Note. I am now signed up with the NIHR HTA programme so will be informed of any updates as and when they occur. I will also receive notification as/when the Deltex project is published, so will post immediately, although there will probably be a RNS at the same time.
2517GEORGE
- 20 Jan 2009 16:43
- 603 of 968
greekman---------not at all boring, always look forward to your posts, and with DEMG moving up the ladder it looks promising, from what I recall the vast majority of DEMG rns's have been positive anyway, and I don't think that will change now, this is a must have for hospitals worldwide, and for the NHS it should attain Standard of Care status at some point.
2517
greekman
- 20 Jan 2009 17:41
- 604 of 968
Thanks George,
The close of market update from CAP is only a change of date re next update is 20/01/09.
For some reason the Deltex Project has slipped down the priority publication list from 8th this morning to the 16th. So it appears that there are now another 8 projects that have an earlier projected publication date. Not reading too much into this as many projects may be far simpler in discipline and technology to deal with.
Also a couple of projects awaiting publication have now been published ahead of others that were above them in the list. So it appears events such as this are common place. Due to this I will look at the list in a different light of importance.
Also if the only updates in the future are limited to a change of date, I will not post such info unless it is relevant.
Greek.
greekman
- 22 Jan 2009 07:56
- 605 of 968
From the Pre close update.
Several snippets of hope for future sales.
The bits I like are....made significant progress in all of its key markets
for the third consecutive year.......group probe sales in each quarter were ahead of the corresponding quarter in the preceding year.......International sales and marketing operations contributed to a sustainable reduction in the level of underlying cash burn.......reduce or defer wherever possible the majority of such discretionary expenditure until the Company's expected continuing growth.
The future is looking better than ever.
2517GEORGE
- 22 Jan 2009 10:15
- 606 of 968
There is so much to like about the progress being made, the spanish operation(sorry about that) look excellent (close to being a standard of care) as does the USA, and with Germany just starting out the sale of probes is still in it's infancy really, and as more hospitals take up the Cardio-Q so the sale of probes should increase substantially. Deferring spending on discretionary items makes sense in the current climate, however I believe this may be to DEMG's advantage, as healthcare spending restrictions are implemented so the adoption of the Cardio-Q becomes more compelling, as it's proven to be more cost effective to use.
2517
greekman
- 23 Jan 2009 09:39
- 607 of 968
Down 6.25% this am (75p). Tempted to invest more but already have Deltex as a very large percentage of my share portfolio, so will probably resist. Although looking cheep at this price, remember there is no such animal in the stock market world as a sure thing.