anyone got any ideas about the block trades that went through today?

website: http://www.sterlingenergyplc.com/



weather: www.nhc.noaa.gov/refresh/graphics_at4+shtml/084938.shtml?50wind120

deadfred

Yep Bukhara are due to spud soon partner is Chinese.

But I was more alluding to the fact that Oil from Ching currently is going to China at a discount of between $4-$5 I was wondering if a deal for exclusive rights to the oil may be being done. Maybe my warped thinking.

Time will tell.

Regards

Dr. Square, I thought Bukhara was a Black Rock prospect ??

LOL :-))))))))))))))))

Fair cop. Just trying some indirect ramping.

What I ment to say before I got my pants pulled down thanks for that soul. Was Baraka oil. Not Bukhara.

Deadfred

Do you think Harry will waste his time on the small fry as in CNOOC. Esso or Exxon now you would be talking.

Regards

Dr Square - nightmare !! - never mind - LOL !! An announcemnt must be due soon from that Colombia tiddler, though, eh? Clearly a Freudian slip on your part . . .

dr if the chinese are trying to get a fixec price then i belive they will be snookered by the oil companies or be locked in at over $65-70 bucks a barrel as i can see new records being set for a barrel price in the not to distant future

as for sey i think the gov might even ask them what they think

lets face it if youve done work with a comp and they aint ripped you off you tend to go back dont you

sey is such a company in the gov eyes were ching is involved

From MF,

SEY has a mention here, re the new Kurdish exploration licence.

Click HERE

What do you of the share price behaviour this week, do you think it could have gone better if it wasn't for the last two days of big falls in the stock market? It was trying test the 33p mark a few times, however the volume of trade is increasing all the time which must be a good sign??

Excellent performance R88AVE.........compared to some of my other holdings LOL,
Well you must keep cheerful :-)
On a serious note it was thought SEY had tremendous prospects at the beginning of last week, no reason to think that has changed at the end of the week.
Young company, huge potential, I'm happy to hold.
opto

I agree - a great performance. If you look at the intraday prices for Friday SEY was at 32p bid right up until late in the day. It only fell away right at the death. Providing the market doesn't tank again next week we could see the highs regained quickly. Far too early to think of taking profits.

I too see no reason to change my opinion of 6th May!

I think its great we can discuss like this, I too think its way too early to sell, I am hoping this will continue grow into a nice pension pay out in the long run.

to my mind, the only short-comings of this site over "another " (which is now only just about up and running again after a month being revamped) is the lack of knowledgeable researchers who were prepared to share their findings, and the ability and willingness of posters to qualify their opinions as to whether the share should be bought or sold or held or something in between .... I am afraid I do not have the necessary skills and patience and knowledge to interpret company info etc, even though I try to make intelligent comment in the light of the facts or opinions presented by others.

cynic, i agreee... cant wait to get back to LSE websitel. alot of rampers around here

jameel, Not rampers. Just people that like to air their views of a company on a good natured site. If you require all posts to be made by extremely knowledgeable investors who never make a positive comment without being substantiated with many researched facts then perhaps you would be better off dashing back to another website.
Perhaps you would be kind enough to call back in when the 'other site' experts are certain when the sp is to rise to 50p or 1 (preferably the day before)

The only reason the SP fell at the end of day on Friday was because the MM`s increased the spread which had the effect of reducing the mid price. Still strong on the offer at 32p.

Optomistic - You are being unfair to Jameel and obviously without background knowledge. Among others and for example as a knowledgeable contributor to LSE was GedW. He had the time, patience and skill to do some very thorough and unbiased research and the posted his findings. I certainly did not always agree with him, and posted accordingly. Nevertheless, his findings were nearly always worth reading and considering.

Optomistic - You are being unfair to Jameel and obviously without background knowledge. Among others and for example as a knowledgeable contributor to LSE was GedW. He had the time, patience and skill to do some very thorough and unbiased research and the posted his findings. I certainly did not always agree with him, and posted accordingly. Nevertheless, his findings were nearly always worth reading and considering.

cynic, I know LSE is back up but I cant seem to log in with my email. Why is that?

LSE?

cynic, do not wish to be unfair to anyone but jameel was very pointed in his/her remark about the thread being made up of rampers. My view is defensive of the posters on here as I believe it is not so.
regards
opto