Proselenes
- 13 Aug 2011 04:53
.
cynic
- 22 May 2012 08:56
- 634 of 2393
certainly quite brave, but if the market heads sharply south once again, specific share logic ceases to apply
required field
- 22 May 2012 08:58
- 635 of 2393
Better to short Facebook......
Proselenes
- 22 May 2012 09:04
- 636 of 2393
Facebook should come down to somewhere between 25 to 30.
cynic
- 22 May 2012 09:11
- 637 of 2393
FB is an easy enough stock to trade though these Nasdaq stocks are so lively, you really do need real-time prices and dealing facility
required field
- 22 May 2012 10:09
- 638 of 2393
I can't understand why FOGL isn't navigating north of 100p by now...crazy....considering the numerous targets for an oil or gas discovery...
cynic
- 22 May 2012 11:35
- 639 of 2393
because it's currently all blue sky and no substance at all
Proselenes
- 22 May 2012 11:47
- 640 of 2393
I must have missed the link below, but anyway, the same as I have been saying, ONGC was not the party that signed the agreement ref farm out of 25%.
ONGC were looking at 35% stake but nothing formal.
The formal talks are with another party - soon to be unveiled ??
http://interfaxenergy.com/natural-gas-news-analysis/latin-america/falkland-oil-and-gas-deny-ongc-deal-talks/
17th May
.......A spokesman from UK-listed Falkland Oil and Gas has denied media reports that Indian company ONGC Videsh was in talks to buy 25% of two exploration blocks in the Falklands’ offshore waters. “They’re one of the companies that have bought a data set, but we’re not in formal talks with ONGC,” the spokesman told Interfax on Thursday. Falklands newspaper Penguin News reported earlier this week that ONGC was on the cusp of farm-in deal. ...........
cynic
- 22 May 2012 12:37
- 642 of 2393
believe the substance to a farm-in agreement when it's actually on the table ...... at the moment, it's all hope and hot air, with ONGC having walked away on gov't instruction
gibby
- 22 May 2012 12:51
- 643 of 2393
chaps are you long because if you are maybe burn on the downtrend - this one due to location will do well to hold up
Proselenes
- 22 May 2012 12:51
- 644 of 2393
ONGC have not walked away. They have been advised by the MEA not to partake, however it is up to them what they do, if they take the advice or not.
As the spokesperson says, FOGL were not in discussions with ONGC anyway, they were just one of many interested parties.
Proselenes
- 22 May 2012 13:59
- 645 of 2393
If anyone is holding their stock in a nominee account (like TDW, Selftrade etc...) and you want to stop the company you use for holding your share electronically, from lending them out to shorters - something to consider.
Log into your account.
Place all your stock for sale on a "Limit Order".
Set the "Sell not lower than" price to 5000 (50 pounds) and the set the time limit to maximum (most do 60 or 90 days).
Then place the trade.
What this does is your stock is then allocated to a "live" order and therefore cannot be loaned out to shorters.
Just something you can do to make the availability of stock on loan to reduce. If you read the small print of most electronic trading accounts you agree to allow the company to loan out the stock if they want to - and they do not have to inform you. They loan your stock out for a fee, and make money on it - and you think its locked away in your trading account...... not so.
required field
- 22 May 2012 14:12
- 646 of 2393
Very interesting....I might just do that....though anybody shorting this wants their head examining....
greekman
- 22 May 2012 14:38
- 647 of 2393
Proselenes,
Good idea.
Your so crafty, I'm beginning to think you work for either a UK bank, HMRC or you are a government adviser!
I do though see a flaw in your idea.
What happens if Fogl suddenly shoot up over £50 and the limit order catches me out.
Didn't think of that one, did you.
We can but dream!
Proselenes
- 22 May 2012 14:44
- 648 of 2393
I did, but if shot to over 50 pounds I would not complain......I am sure of that !
required field
- 22 May 2012 14:45
- 649 of 2393
Me neither....
Pessimism Sauce
- 22 May 2012 15:39
- 650 of 2393
Whats the most likely outcome we can expect in late june/early july from Lolligo drilling?
gibby
- 22 May 2012 16:37
- 651 of 2393
goog advice chaps news yo some but also politics gla
halifax
- 22 May 2012 16:42
- 652 of 2393
duster.
required field
- 22 May 2012 17:46
- 653 of 2393
We don't know but there are several targets within this one well, the biggest being of course Loligo....and there is a hefty chance of a commercial strike whether gas or oil.....go back to the thread before the Sealion strike for RKH....same old rhetoric with plenty of doubters...and then wooossshhh...the area is vast and there are at least a dozen prospects if not more.....the chances of a find are quite good in my opinion...we already have perhaps a commercial gas condensate discovery on its own....it probably will need to be tied in with something else to be viable but not bad for a first well...FOGL is stock numer uno for me...and I have a foothold in BOR with a ratio of 9 FOGL for 1 BOR share.....we shall see...if BOR's Stebbing is a dud...I'll put the balance into FOGL....remember these wells are a long, long way apart : Loligo to Stebbing 120 miles I think if not more...but similarities in geology...as it is a marine basin...check out the pdf's on their websites....makes a great evening read...I'm almost convinced that either gas or oil awaits FOGL....the seismic shows something very large...