Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

ExecLine - 05 Feb 2008 14:01 - 6544 of 81564

Amongst all this political stuff and putting of the world to rights, don't let's forget it's Pancake Day today and also Valentine's Day quite soon.

PS. There are some who say pancakes are bad for you.

kimoldfield - 05 Feb 2008 14:06 - 6545 of 81564

Pancakes bad for you? Only in Ripon ExecLine, and only if you fall over!

ExecLine - 05 Feb 2008 14:10 - 6546 of 81564

Pancake Day Race cancelled in Ripon due to Health and Safety regulations.

The UK has surely finally gone mad. What Health and Safety poppycock!

hewittalan6 - 05 Feb 2008 14:14 - 6547 of 81564

I'm sure I said it before, but it bears repeating.
Anthropologists have found the fossil of the worlds first health and safety officer.
He belonged to a tribe who used to follow animals around waiting for them to die rather than hunting, becuase they were not allowed sharp spears, and then eat them raw as they were not allowed close enough to fire to cook them.

maddoctor - 05 Feb 2008 14:15 - 6548 of 81564

i know one of these guys , he earns a fortune going around counting cracks in pavements!

greekman - 06 Feb 2008 07:59 - 6549 of 81564

My confidence is now fully restored.

The Speaker of the house has chosen three MPs to investigate the allegations of MP's expenses. The three include David Maclean, the Conservative MP who tried to stop the Freedom of Information Act applying to questions about MPs expenses and who got the taxpayer to pay for his quad bike, and Sir Stuart Bell, a Labour MP who hired his son Malcolm as a researcher. While working in Parliament, Bell junior broke into George Galloway's (Saddam Hussein is my hero) office, stole his chequebook and made off with 2,000 from Galloway's bank account. Bell Senior is obviously just the man to decide whether MPs hiring members of their family can lead to dishonesty.

Talk about self interest. I would put unbelievable, but these days anything is.

hewittalan6 - 06 Feb 2008 08:10 - 6550 of 81564

And further to that..........
Yesterday David Cameron announced that all front bench Tory MPs must disclose everything about their expenses, who they employ, what for and where the rest of the money goes.
This was hot news on the radio, all day, and all day we were treated to a succession of Tory spokesmen pointing out that it was all in the interests of honesty, openess and transparancy. It was hilarious to then listen to them refuse to answer the questions of "will it apply to non front benchers" and "if not, why not". In a spirit of honesty and transparancy, they wriggled like hell and wouldn't give an answer, just trotting out the line of "why can't you be pleased we are doing something".
One interviewer of Ruth Kelly, illicited from her that while every man woman and child in the UK who wishes to claim expenses or tax reliefs must, by law, provide receipts, this doesn't apply to politicians, though her front bench would now have to. The back benchers apparantly, can still have the country take their word for it!!!

greekman - 06 Feb 2008 08:36 - 6551 of 81564

My problem is I desperately want this thieving Labour government out, but what's the alternative. Whoever wins the next election it will be a case of, it's now our turn to move from the opposition trough (not quite as lucrative) to the more lucrative we are now in power trough (which is probably a bit deeper).
I will probably end up voting for a fringe party. Not because I feel they would be any whiter, or better for the country, it would be purely as a protest vote.
I sincerely hope that with all the forthcoming financial problems, IE increases in prices for food, power, fuel community charge and so on people will say enough is enough and become far more militant.
The stone is being bled dry.

hewittalan6 - 06 Feb 2008 08:44 - 6552 of 81564

My problem is I want to vote for anarchy, and thats a bit of a paradox in anyones language.
By the way, according to the OED prior to 1929, anarchy was defined as "A perfect state with no need for government". Only now does it mean beating people with a pick axe handle.

greekman - 06 Feb 2008 09:06 - 6553 of 81564

Anarchy v Dictatorship. Someone recently stated that in this country we have a democratically elected dictatorship. Whilst obviously we are not a dictatorship as compared with many countries, there are often policies that are not even (especially under Blair) that were not discussed in cabinet. How can that and the none promised vote on the EU constitution be a democracy.

oblomov - 06 Feb 2008 09:06 - 6554 of 81564


The present problem is, IMO, that we have a corrupt government doing a bad job. Having a corrupt government is (just about) acceptable if they are competent - I'd be happy to settle for that.

Trouble is, this government has even become incompetent at being corrupt!

Any new government is likely to be at best less than squeaky clean, but at least you have the chance (highly likely) that they may be more competent than the Gordon McBrown Gang.

The odd 50,000 paid to the pet Budgie for helping with research is a small price to pay if we're otherwise gettng value for money. You have to decide which party is most likely to deliver that value for money.

Alan, you don't need to vote for Anarchy - if this bunch stays in power much longer you'll get it!






greekman - 06 Feb 2008 09:08 - 6555 of 81564

Oblomov,

Incompetent at being corrupt! Classic absolutely classic.

kimoldfield - 06 Feb 2008 09:32 - 6556 of 81564

Only one step left then - incompetent at being incompetent; or are we already there? I'm sure I've heard it said somewhere?!

hewittalan6 - 07 Feb 2008 19:31 - 6557 of 81564

I take back all I said a couple of weeks ago, about UK plc having no industry worth talking of left.
Todays news is all about a proposed boom in our import & export trade.
According to the premier league, we are about to export crowd trouble, bad haircuts and cliches worldwide as the clubs play an international fixture every year.
As for imports, our friend the Archbishop of canterbury has said we should import laws and morals from Afghanistan. Don't dare to criticise his support for Shariah, cos the law in Afghanistan means he would have to cut yer lips off for that.

explosive - 07 Feb 2008 19:56 - 6558 of 81564

There goes equal rights then, as if they were ever equal anyway, I always get lumbered with the DIY and mowing the grass... How you doing Alan, not spoke since the collapse of Stan...... Won't say the rest as a very sore subject??

ptholden - 07 Feb 2008 22:27 - 6559 of 81564

Here's a subject that really irks me - whaling.

The BBC have shown footage on the news this evening of Japanese whalers killing a mother and its calf, allegedly in the name of science, but in reality to satisfy the Japanese food market. Having hunted the species to near extinction common sense eventually prevailed and a ban imposed to protect the whales. Personally I can see no reason for the Japanese nor the Norwegians to continue killing these magnificent creatures, it makes me sick. I have been lucky enough to get quite close to whales in the South Atlantic, a fantastic experience. It's a pity world opinion cannot be galvanised sufficiently to stop the killing. Japan's economy relies entirely upon its exports for survival, an embargo on Japanese products for a few months by the rest of the world would bring the country to its knees; would that ever happen? With regret, I would have to say, no chance!!

ptholden - 07 Feb 2008 22:27 - 6560 of 81564

Double post - oops

ptholden - 07 Feb 2008 22:27 - 6561 of 81564

Triple post - more oops

ptholden - 07 Feb 2008 22:27 - 6562 of 81564

And again :(

ptholden - 07 Feb 2008 22:28 - 6563 of 81564

Jeez, wtf is the matter with this site??!!
Register now or login to post to this thread.