anyone got any ideas about the block trades that went through today?

website: http://www.sterlingenergyplc.com/



weather: www.nhc.noaa.gov/refresh/graphics_at4+shtml/084938.shtml?50wind120

Now I have read it the item says what I thought it did.

Iran will soon have an energy deficit that they will seek to close by enriching uranium or by getting friendly with it's near neighbour, Iraq who are able to deal with it's new foreign friends.

As to whether the USA would do anything tactical in Iran?

Who knows, but would Israel?

The odds are they may do something through subterfuge first but if that fails, then they have to do a tactical strike, the sabre has been rattled in their direction in respect on nuclear weapons from Iraq.

No point worrying, if the worlds economy collapses as a result, we could all become black marketeers instead.

For anyone who hasn't seen the RNS:

Sterling Energy PLC
28 December 2006


Sterling Energy PLC (the 'Company')


Holding in Company


The Company today received a notification dated 22 December 2006 from The
Capital Group Companies, Inc. ('CGC') that, as at 21 December 2006, CGC had an
interest in 116,415,000 ordinary shares of 1p each in the Company ('Ordinary
Shares'). This interest represents approximately 8.29 per cent. of the issued
ordinary share capital of the Company, being 1,402,950,558 Ordinary Shares.


This interest arises by virtue of Ordinary Shares attributed to the following
registered names:

Registered Name Ordinary Shares


State Street Nominees Limited 16,500,000

Chase Nominees Limited 99,915,000

If this can break the stubborn 19p barrier, I think it will be off! I see mm had been testing the water with bids at 19p this morning. Maybe it will today.

also see my post + chart 6677 ...... not only (some) resistance at 19, but likely to be sterner still at about 22 where 200 dma is hit

Of course it has to get there to test the resistance..........

Next week I understand.

How many times have I said that the oil price would be supported at $60. That does not mean that it won`t go below that but it does mean that if it does you can be sure of production cuts. Even in Iran production is heading down through lack of investment and that is before any sanctions take hold. Those voices that are now telling us that the oil price could plumet could at the drop of a hat be telling us they could rocket. All these speculative positions do not help any long term Sterling holder.
Out of interest, now that Madagascar will be hitting the headlines this year I thought I should do a little research. 2d surveys have been ongoing for some time to be followed by 3d. These are causing a lot of excitement in the area. On one onshore block they are CERTAIN that they have 3 billion barrels and offshore the possible reserves are much higher. I would recommend that people do some research and they will see that the surveys are being completed and the drilling will start in the near future. In the meantime we are awaiting the results of a number of HIGH IMPACT wells along with what could be some exciting news from Kurdistan.

fido - there is more to this than the price of oil.

Petrel Resources (PET) Asked if nationalistic Iraq, resenting the US & global oilcos, is grooming PET into
a "BIG BEAST". DH replied: "that is exactly what is happening"

maestro I am intersted so give us the link.

ok... www.lemminginvestor.com

http://www.lemminginvestor.com/

Is a subscription only and I am not about to spend 43 to check out a comment on discussion board.

Just about as useful as usual meastro; Not!

So who attributed those words to David Horgan, because your post does, and I hope it is you reporting something you have seen.

I joined lemming last year and have made very successful investments by following their research. SOLA with spectacular results, CCH-rising rapidly, BPRG and EIIB doing OK. I will certainly renew so don't dismiss them as another average tip sheet.

seawallwalker ..its free info...look before shouting ya mouth off..lol!

That is not what I asked maestro!

listen seawall...quit whinging and fill ya boots monday or regret bigtime... Con Horgan is not a bull-shitter!

I am not whinging, I am asking.

You are not answering.

Forget it.

I wont thanks, but good luck.

PS:- Con Horgan is a bullshitter.

The Danbury Dome did him no favours in my eyes.

I was lucky to get out wit 3/4 of my investment.



Guess when that was?

I dont care what he says, anything he has interests in means I employ my long bargepole.

Good luck PET and PRE people, you all deserve a bit of luck from those Irish wags.

January 2007 00:18 Home > News > Business > Business News
Iraq poised to end drought for thirsting oil giants
After 35 years, the third-largest reserves in the world are to be opened to American and British companies
By Danny Fortson
Published: 07 January 2007
For more than three decades, foreign oil companies wanting into Iraq have been like children pressed against the sweet shop window - desperately seeking to feast on the goodies but having no way of getting through the door.

That could soon change.

The Iraqi Council of Ministers is expected to approve, as early as today, a controversial new hydrocarbon law, heavily pushed by the US and UK governments, that will radically redraw the Iraqi oil industry and throw open the doors to the third-largest oil reserves in the world. It would allow the first large-scale operation of foreign oil companies in the country since the industry was nationalised in 1972.

It would also be a shot in the arm for the global petroleum industry. The biggest oil companies are finding it ever harder to uncover new reserves to replace those that are going dry. Iraq sits on a sea of easily tapped, high-quality crude.

For a sector desperate for a panacea, the stakes couldn't be higher. By conservative estimates, Iraq represents about one-tenth of the world's reserves at 115 billion barrels. Most of this is untapped or under-exploited. Former oil minister Issam Al-Chalabi was quoted recently saying that a fully functioning Iraqi oil industry could generate $100bn (52bn) in annual revenue.

The new legislation "is a redrawing of the whole Iraqi oil industry into a modern standard," said Khaled Salih, a spokesman for the Kurdish Regional Government, a party in the negotiations. "It will allow new technologies to come in to revitalise the oil industry and allow foreign investors to invest long-term in Iraq and upgrade infrastructure."

Iraqi government sources say the hope is to have the law on the books by March.

No one expects big players such as Exxon, BP and Shell to jump into the country until the security situation stabilises. They are jockeying to stake their claims now for exploitation later. "It's a mad rush to get something there," said James Paul, the executive director of Global Policy Forum, a New York watchdog group. "The companies are saying, 'Before any troops are withdrawn, we have to have these contracts.' "

So why are the oil companies so desperate to get a foot in the door? For one, they are struggling to keep production increasing in line with demand, which last year rose to more than 82 million barrels a day. Those rises have been driven in large part by the growth of the Chinese economy. The tide of oil nationalism in places such as Venezuela, where the stranglehold applied by President Hugo Chavez on the industry has led to lower production, has shifted more pressure on to the rest of the industry.

Also, the cost-per-barrel of extracting oil in Iraq is among the lowest in the world because the reserves are relatively close to the surface . This contrasts starkly with the expensive and risky lengths to which the oil industry must go to find new reserves elsewhere - witness the super-deep offshore drilling and cost-intensive techniques needed to extract oil form Canada's tar sands.

"The majors are finding it increasingly difficult to locate actual black oil resources," said Praveen Martis, an analyst at research firm Wood Mackenzie.

The most coveted sites in Iraq are the Majnoon and West Qurna fields, both close to Basra in the south of the country. Together, they fields represent nearly a quarter of Iraq's proven reserves. Total and Russia's Lukoil had deals in place with Saddam Hussein's government on the Majnoon and West Qurna fields respectively.

It is arguable whether these contracts are still valid, and Exxon is now seen by insiders as the frontrunner to nab the rights to the Majnoon field.

Other parts of the country, such as the Western desert, remain virtually unexplored and could be home to large reserves.

Critical to whether the petro-leum industry will be able to exploit Iraq's buried treasure will be the introduction of production-sharing agreements (PSAs). These are contracts that allow the state to retain legal ownership of its reserves but let international companies share in the profits from extracting oil, in exchange for investing in the infrastructure and operation of the wells, pipelines and refineries. The agreements would be the key to the sweeping development of the Iraqi industry by international companies.

According to an early draft of the legislation that was sent to oil companies this past summer and obtained by The Independent on Sunday, PSAs are the centrepiece of the new legal framework.

Their introduction would be a first for a major Middle Eastern power and is sure to be highly contentious. Saudi Arabia and Iran, the world's number one and two producers, both control their industries tightly with no appreciable foreign company collaboration. According to the Iraqi draft legislation, the PSAs could be fixed for as long as 30 years, which would provide a welcome framework in which the companies could work. Though they are preferred by the oil industry, PSAs don't always guarantee profits for Western companies.

The Russian government depended heavily on PSAs in the 1990s when it was far weaker economically than it is now. The Kremlin has since made moves to wind back these agreements. The most notorious instance came last month when Shell was forced to cede a controlling stake in the $20bn Sakhalin 2 oil and gas project back to the Russian state-owned gas giant Gazprom, after months of brinkmanship from the Kremlin.

Yet for all the black gold that lies under the sand of the Iraqi desert, any potential payoff for Western oil giants is years off. An enormous amount of work remains to be done. The infra-structure is decrepit and patchy after years of neglect, and there is the risk of sabotage and wars. The country is in a state of near anarchy and the debate about the ownership and exploitation of its main asset, which accounts for nearly all of Iraq's GDP and export revenues, is still to be had.

But if the new hydrocarbon proposals pass through their fledgling parliament, the Iraqi people will be forced to share their buried treasure with the West's oil giants.

http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/article2132467.ece

"Iraqi government sources say the hope is to have the law on the books by March."


Not tomorrow then!

my sentiments too SWW ..... Iraq is currently so unstable (actually much worse) that it is inconceivable that any meaningful legislation can be passed, let alone any relating to the one major asset owned by this artificial agglomeration of disparate states ....... all of which are likely to go their separate ways in due course.