Proselenes
- 13 Aug 2011 04:53
.
greekman
- 25 May 2012 14:16
- 677 of 2393
Cynic,
I do agree with you there re hype tripe.
I have equally as much against 'Buy this is fantastic' without either back up facts or well argued opinion/views as I do with any negative type post also poorly argued.
The best posts are always Cold reality, negative or positive.
Greek.
halifax
- 25 May 2012 16:02
- 678 of 2393
greek if you want reality then the facts speak for themselves no oil apart from Sealion which has yet to attract a farmin oilie with deep pockets, if BOR turn up with another dry hole then the "South Atlantic bubble game" may be over. The only winners being the drilling companies owners and the directors of RKH etc.
required field
- 25 May 2012 16:29
- 679 of 2393
Dry hole ?...what dry hole ?....large gas condensate discovery....3 more wells to go...perhaps even a fourth depending on funds and drilling results and time schedule.
halifax
- 25 May 2012 16:31
- 680 of 2393
rf no oil!
greekman
- 25 May 2012 17:11
- 681 of 2393
Hi Halifax,
Totally disagree.
The oil is there in sufficient quantities in Sealion alone to attract either a farm-in or a bidder.
If no one was interested we would have heard long before now.
Even if Bor's next drill is dry, there are still a multitude of other prospects to drill.
From reading many of your previous posts, I know we disagree on the prospects of the FI oil fields, so I think we will have to agree to differ.
Regards
Greek.
halifax
- 25 May 2012 17:45
- 682 of 2393
greek we are all allowed our opinions but you have to respect the facts only one significant oil discovery but surprisingly no farmin offers to date, why? otherwise all virtually dry holes so if BOR's next drill turns out to be a duster then the game is up. tell us why majors are not rushing to spend huge amounts in exploration and development in the Falklands?
greekman
- 25 May 2012 18:37
- 683 of 2393
Halifax,
Agree re all entitied to opinions, that is why I stated that we will have to agree to differ, as I doubt either of us will change our views.
As to majors not rushing in.
I feel that most of these companies will wait to see if more oil is found to increase the max in these fields, as majors tend not to take the risks (and I do agree there are risks) that smaller to mid companies do.
Anadarko who are probably taking to Rockhopper are one of the majors that appear interested though, and we don't yet know if or how many more are doing so.
I don't doubt that there are several of these small/medium oil producers sniffing round.
required field
- 26 May 2012 08:48
- 685 of 2393
I prefer to be in before a strike .....it's as simple as that.....and there are numerous strikes possible....stacked reservoirs in some cases.....where did you get the 8% from ?.....in a wildcat well it's either you hit oil or not......including Stebbing 3 wells to go...perhaps even 4.....a big gas strike would do no harm either...it's risky but if you want low risk...buy Tesco.....I have nothing against RKH.....that's a good investment but longterm....patience is needed with that one.....this is an excellent drilling campaign with perhaps more discoveries to be had.....gas or oil...I think that most people are forgetting that Borders and Southern are a cash rich company and had no problems in raising cash at 84p.....(62p) now....and are fully financed for the foreseeable future....in the event of Stebbing not coming up to expectation : then a jump into FOGL for the following two or three wells is a possibility......same conversation all over again with Rockhopper prior to the Sealion discovery...really a sense of deja-vu here....
cynic
- 26 May 2012 09:31
- 686 of 2393
i reckon mark has absolutely the right idea, whether or not his 8% chance of success is correct ..... to be in this and similar up to the hilt is nuts unless you think (russian) roulette offers good odds too - in which case you are totally and irretrievably bonkers!
required field
- 26 May 2012 09:42
- 687 of 2393
8% is ridiculous......the sp should rise ahead of FOGL getting the rig; we already have a what seems large gas condensate discovery under our belt.....these next wells are much better for chances as two targets for Stebbing in the upper Cretaceous and Tertiary...and from what I gather oil discoveries have been made in Argentine acreage in these rocks further to the west....and then 5 targets in the Loligo well followed by another well with as yet not known multiple targets....perhaps Scotia or something else......situation just like before in the North Falklands when nobody was interested until Sealion....check out the latest pdf presentation by FOGL taking into accout Darwin's results...
Proselenes
- 26 May 2012 14:53
- 689 of 2393
RF, they are winding you up somewhat posting nonsense. The 8% mentioned by GS is THEIR thinking, it is not a CPR. For example the chances for Darwin were around 26% but GS said 10% chance of hydrocarbons, and it hit hydrocarbons.
Loligo has around a 25% chance of success in normal speak, if a certain broker wishes to apply their own CoS thats their choice. At the end of the day only the drill but will decide what is really there.
I mean, look at the first drill in the North Falklands - a total mess up by DES with the Liz prospect. Horrible thin sands and a fart of gas.
At least Darwin is a massive single thick sandstone and it looks to be full of condensate and gas.
Did everything give up with Liz failure and say no oil in the North ? No, of course not.
I have quite a few muppets filtered - and their posts are invisible, I suggest you do the same if you get taken in and upset by the nonsense they post !!!
Proselenes
- 26 May 2012 14:54
- 690 of 2393
And do not forget, the same idiots were saying sell and avoid FOGL at 45p - what complete muppets.
cynic
- 26 May 2012 16:53
- 691 of 2393
i was probably one of those, and if so, am not ashamed to say i have changed my stance just slightly and have a very modest stake here while continuing with RKH, which still has to be the better bet - safer if you like
Proselenes
- 27 May 2012 04:44
- 693 of 2393
cynic, I would not class you as one of the muppets as you are risk averse and open about being risk averse. The muppets are the ones who quickly end up in my filtered poster list so I never have to read their nonsense again.
cynic
- 27 May 2012 07:47
- 694 of 2393
"risk averse" has levels of degree ...... and yes, i would rather play blackjack than roulette (which i actually find boring) and certainly wouldn't even think of buying lottery tickets
required field
- 27 May 2012 09:06
- 695 of 2393
We all need a little bit of luck in life.....in fact we are lucky to be alive !...I am convinced that there is a good chance...(no percentages)... of finding oil or gas in commercial quantities with the next or present wells....
aldwickk
- 27 May 2012 12:16
- 696 of 2393
Cynic
You get better odd's playing Bingo , so i have read. And if you bought the max number of Premium bond's you would get an income of 7% from the prize drew from the number of time's that you would win , i think that is what i read