markymar
- 15 Aug 2005 15:14
http://www.falklands-oil.com/
http://www.rockhopperexploration.co.uk
http://www.argosresources.com/


Rockhopper was established in 2004 with a strategy to invest in and undertake an offshore oil exploration programme in the North Falkland Basin. It was floated on AIM in August 2005. Rockhopper was the first company to make a commercial oil discovery in the Falklands. Today Rockhopper is the largest acreage holder in the North Falkland Basin, with interests in the Greater Mediterranean region.
HARRYCAT
- 07 May 2010 11:25
- 695 of 6294
FT blog today - "rumours of an update on the Falklands find at 3.00pm".
Proselenes
- 07 May 2010 11:26
- 696 of 6294
Its risk/reward.
If the next update is good and the price surges all those saying "well done for selling and taking profits" will be mute and avoiding posting.
Greed and fear, thats what drives markets.
I am opting on to the side of "not selling" and waiting for more "good news" and to see much much higher prices.
Time will tell if thats the right call, I am willing to take the risk :)
Master RSI
- 07 May 2010 11:27
- 697 of 6294
I am sure some of the sellers wish DID NOT at this point
Ofcourse a profit is a profit and so on
Proselenes
- 07 May 2010 11:28
- 698 of 6294
Harrycat, this could be a "huge" find so possible for an update late today or Monday.
Fingers crossed........take the risk or not is the question, I am taking it and happy to be right or wrong on that call.
HARRYCAT
- 07 May 2010 11:30
- 699 of 6294
Apparently it is a RNS concerning the pressure encountered down the well. Rumour is that the pressure was above expectations. I reiterate, rumour only at this point.
Proselenes
- 07 May 2010 11:33
- 700 of 6294
Good pressure + 19% porosity = likely commercial find.
Fingers crossed for good news on that front, thats key to moving it up to a new higher level for now.
required field
- 07 May 2010 11:36
- 701 of 6294
Tiptoed back in but at a fraction of the amount held earlier....should have bought back in as soon as sold out....went down to 81p...10mn later..
chav
- 07 May 2010 11:50
- 702 of 6294
cynic - 06 May 2010 17:36 - 647 of 701 ...lol....SFB is a lot deeper and only Toroa can be drilled with the OG type Rig. All the other targets require a very expensive Drill ship or higher spec, non anchoring, semi-sub...BOR also require higher spec Rig for it's very deep targets.
Big Al
- 07 May 2010 11:51
- 703 of 6294
Proselenes
I'm quite sure most who say to take the profit today will certainly continue posting. You seem to know little about the oilfield BTW, but I'm thinking this is due to your current euphoria overcoming logic.
cynic
- 07 May 2010 12:09
- 704 of 6294
on map above, and i accept i am exceedingly thick, water looks much deeper in north basin
========
reuters have no new rns
markymar
- 07 May 2010 12:10
- 705 of 6294
Big Al,
May a suggest you read CPR to get a better undertanding of things
http://www.rockhopperexploration.co.uk/pdf/RPS_Rockhopper_CPR.pdf
chav
- 07 May 2010 12:18
- 706 of 6294
Cynic...NFB much shallower than SFB.
cynic
- 07 May 2010 12:20
- 707 of 6294
obviously i need to learn to read ocean charts then!
i assumed 500m was deeper than 100m - see map at top
chav
- 07 May 2010 12:22
- 708 of 6294
The map above shows all NFB i.e. DES/RKH/Argos areas...it is confusing having said map labeling the Southern section of the NFB as Southern Basin!
markymar
- 07 May 2010 12:28
- 709 of 6294
Big Al
- 07 May 2010 12:38
- 711 of 6294
markymar - I'm extremely capable of reading and understanding (fully) the CPR. ;-)))
cynic
- 07 May 2010 12:43
- 712 of 6294
thanks marky, but Sealion is close to 500m contour which, as i (stupidly?) commented, sounds a lot deeper than 200m
required field
- 07 May 2010 13:16
- 713 of 6294
We need some "uptodate" maps...
required field
- 07 May 2010 13:36
- 714 of 6294
Out again ....another profit...boy !...is this fun or what ?.