Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

STERLING ENERGY big buyers about... (SEY)     

proptrade - 14 Jun 2004 11:58

anyone got any ideas about the block trades that went through today?

website: http://www.sterlingenergyplc.com/

graph.php?movingAverageString=%2C50%2C20

weather: www.nhc.noaa.gov/refresh/graphics_at4+shtml/084938.shtml?50wind120

optomistic - 14 Mar 2008 10:11 - 7015 of 7811

Does indeed Goal and at 6100 lbs/sq ft pressure it is not going to take much to get it out of the ground :-)

ahoj - 14 Mar 2008 10:57 - 7016 of 7811

So, they won't go under. Those shorted this company should start buying back next week. IMO

The volume yesterday was the third highest volume ever since ten years ago. 80M was the highest just before it touched 35p... I bought at 33p though!

optomistic - 14 Mar 2008 11:12 - 7017 of 7811

ahoj, sure about the volume, we had 64 million traded yesterday, I'm sure I have seen several other high days?
Re the short traders, if they leave it until next week they could be a long way out, shorts need to close fast IMO.
33p seems a lot nearer today than yesterday but will take more than a few days to see that figure again.
Good luck
opto

poo bear - 14 Mar 2008 23:41 - 7018 of 7811

I very much doubt there was any shorting of this company.

More like ineptitude by the management and a complete disregard of the small investor.

That is why HW has been side;lined and in the nick of time too imo.

Now it has a chance if you are prepared to hold for another 5 years.

I will hold my few just for fun after all they cost me nowt!

Meantime those who feel the need may ramp away.

Andy - 15 Mar 2008 13:12 - 7019 of 7811

Long time since I looked in here!

Finally, some good exploration news!

One point that seems to have been missed, and I'm surprised SEY didn't mention it in their RNS, is the higher price of gas in USA, which will compound the already higher production in 2008.

Add on the new production, and all in all a decent result.

ahoj - 16 Mar 2008 22:54 - 7020 of 7811

SEY will be more valuable to bigger player as Shell is reducing it's reserve.

ahoj - 03 Apr 2008 08:22 - 7021 of 7811

Is this the start of recovery I was waiting for?
I am too busy to watch/listen SEY presentation in the conference...

optomistic - 03 Apr 2008 08:33 - 7022 of 7811

Oilbarrel conference today.

poo bear - 04 Apr 2008 00:09 - 7023 of 7811

Shell?

Don't make me laugh!

If they spin off either Africa or USA they will be a takeover candidate, while they are so diversified, they have no chance unless their institutional backers want a change of Management.

niceonecyril - 07 Apr 2008 10:00 - 7024 of 7811

Exciting times ahead?
http://www.investegate.co.uk/Article.aspx?id=200804070701187179R
One for the bottom draw imho?
cyril

poo bear - 07 Apr 2008 11:31 - 7025 of 7811

Absolutely the right thing to do.

As and when the sale is complete, things will be looking very up imo.

ahoj - 07 Apr 2008 12:56 - 7026 of 7811

150M for part of the asset should add about 100% to share price.

poo bear - 07 Apr 2008 13:33 - 7027 of 7811

Erm, thats the price for the whole USA thing.

ahoj - 07 Apr 2008 14:46 - 7028 of 7811

Thanks,
You'r right. Editted
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080407/oil_prices.html

chessplayer - 08 Apr 2008 15:38 - 7029 of 7811

looks like sterling have scraped the bottom of the barrel,get it!
what chance for a recovery?

halifax - 08 Apr 2008 15:53 - 7030 of 7811

Either the recent announcement is a fire sale or this is a good stategic move. But selling their assets in the US will have a negative impact on their cashflow greater than the cost of servicing their debt, using the sale proceeds on exploration will have a detrimental effect on their cash resources.

stockdog - 08 Apr 2008 23:37 - 7031 of 7811

My friend donaferentes' view from another site with which I concur:-

SEY have been a diversified small time operation hitherto - both producer (US) and explorer/developer (Africa/ME). Selling the US producing operations is a good thing:-

1) If Acamas is correct the US operating margin is 30% with net profit of 10% after local/central overheads and regulatory costs (43 jurisdictions!), so it should be worth 30% margin, less very little additional overhead to an existing (US?) operator already dealing with regulation, to buy. So no reason we should not get a good price.

2) Having sold production, we become a pure explorer/developer which has always been the most exciting part of the company which they have managed well, getting into licences early then farming out for a good free carried interest etc. Seems like some licences are going to come good in the next year or so, no longer needing the production cashcow to keep the company going.

3) Geographically we will be concentrated within two closely proximate areas of the world Africa/ME - virtually one area. So much easier to run. And losing all that US regulation and overhead cost - what a relief!

4) Debt free - have you any idea how light headed we should all feel as the credit crisis lurches on to its nadir in a year or two's time still to go? Fantastic.

5) We seem to have a great little collection of diversified explorations to look forward to with a good deal of cash to get there.

6) Acamas (again, sorry!) complains about management change of heart. There hasn't been a change of heart - it's been a change of management! Most welcome - pace HW.

7) Shit or bust - that's the nature of exploration. But from this SP level the risk-reward ratio is far better than the current dual policy.

Great strategic decision with lots to play for IMHO!

poo bear - 09 Apr 2008 07:30 - 7032 of 7811

Hi Stockie, seems those who have been around this share for a long time more or less concur.

I am afraid there has been an awful lot of heads in sand here and over there concerning the financial position of Sterling, the recall of their loan back in November, which the pi's were not told about is what caused all this sp distress post David O'Brien's first notifiable interest.

To manage to pay off the loan should any sale of US assets occur is a real bonus during this current climate as any residual cash will fund other imminent activities and still pay the Board their bonus.

It's still a high risk because they may not get a sale, or they may be striped up as I would have thought it is now a buyers market due to financial constraints, and I think this proves that the Whittier purchase was a very big mistake when it occurred timing wise, something they learnt on retrospect.

However, now with a decent sale, things should work out.

Ha well, we shall see as always.

hightech - 09 Apr 2008 08:28 - 7033 of 7811

stockdog,
Thanks for comprehensive review. It reminds me of Dragon when it decided to close its headquarter in London to move to Dubai. Oil price was $10 and DGO was 11p at the time. It was a great move.
Sey is close to selling a part of its asset at 150M, at the time it's profitable, its market cap is 133M and has substantial Oil reserves and huge potential. It worth twice the current levels. IMO

kuzemko - 10 Apr 2008 21:19 - 7034 of 7811

shares.mag- possible target 50p???
Register now or login to post to this thread.