anyone got any ideas about the block trades that went through today?

website: http://www.sterlingenergyplc.com/



weather: www.nhc.noaa.gov/refresh/graphics_at4+shtml/084938.shtml?50wind120

.

Wow! An impressive climb!!!

The stock was consolidated you idiot!!

Haha! I thought I would get your attention.

yep
but could someone perhaps get MAM's attention to adjust the chart accordingly. i think it it is possible. it would certainly help, maybe with a note of the consolidation posted somewhere so we might be aware of it?or maybe both charts? the original preconsolidated one as above plus the adjusted one. would this be possible?
do i need to post over at the bugs thread ? or will this post do?
thanks
regards
jk

all you have to do is read the rns accordingly....

Bb
yep but how will that help me get a true chart reading if data isnt adjusted?
regards
jkd

.

Nearly every time there is a consolidation of some kind in just about any stock : some sort of pullback occurs.....before rising again....here we are again...

If old price was 5p then current price would be ( see 7381 14/1/10 above )
3.41p / 4p (offer conversion equivalent 85.25% ) on say old price of 5p = 4.2625p
4.2625 x 40 ( consolidation ) = 5p old price equivalent to 170.50 today equivalent

Price now 173.50p is equivalent to old price before open offer of 5.085p

Still room for improvement ? if old price was 7p then now would be 238.75p

Why the chart guys are too lazy to make corrections I do not know - they should not be employed.

.

r
you probably are correct. but it is said a picture is worth a thousand words. that may or may not be correct. anyway how do i draw a true trend line on this chart without the data having been amended accordingly and without having to do all the calculations? i am not lazy and believe i should be employed, its just such a monumental task when it aught and can be be so easy. why do it the hard and long way when there is an easier and shorter way? surely that is being efficient is it not?
but then i am a chart guy.
regards
jkd

It's being sorted as I have requested today that MAM amend the chart.

HC
thank you
regards
jkd

I think that this is heading for 200p before the spud....heavens forbid that the well turns into a duster.....

I think what needs to be done is multiply all the old figures / charts by 3.41/4 x 40 = 34.1 --- that may sort it ?

r
i am sure MAM will do necessary.
since you like playing with numbers what reckon you on 9 squared = 81.=the total
number of naturally occuring non radioactve elements in the universe. 8+1=9 all the rest are radioactive.
regards
jkd
edit
19/ 01 forgot to add, either or not naturally occuring, ie not being naturally occuring = man made in a lab.
naturally occuring if left alone by man being the main substance. they will ALL stiill naturally occur. man or no man. All 81 of them NO more NO less.
just my opinion.

HC
that looks so much better, but surely it is still not accurate.
maybe next time?
regards
jkd