Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Empyrean Energy (EME) (EME)     

PapalPower - 21 Nov 2005 08:12

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Size=283*18Chart.aspx?Provider=Intra&Code=EME&Size=big.chart?symb=uk%3Aeme&compidx=aaaaa%3AEmpyrean Energy

Web site : http://www.empyreanenergy.com

Big Al - 14 Feb 2007 22:48 - 752 of 2087

News today - testing commenced at Sugarloaf.

No-one following this any more? ;-0

cynic - 15 Feb 2007 08:33 - 753 of 2087

sp action is so dull it's not even worth teasing anyone at the mo!

hlyeo98 - 15 Feb 2007 08:58 - 754 of 2087

Hahaha cynic...EME is not much fun now

tcdmct - 15 Feb 2007 23:24 - 755 of 2087

Nice to see you admit that you have only been taking the piss out of fellow investers......well done

Big Al - 16 Feb 2007 00:08 - 756 of 2087

40p level seems to be supported at the moment.

cynic - 16 Feb 2007 06:11 - 757 of 2087

tcdmct .... have always accepted that some may either not like my stance and/or the way i put it ..... that is arguably their loss! ..... with regard to EME and SEO (for example), i hold the companies in pretty low esteem and will write as much .... the underlying opinion will be serious, though the style may be somewhat facetious ..... almost without fail, i try to keep "friends" feet on the ground - e.g. profits do not come from having wonderfully prospective bits of ground to drill.

seawallwalker - 16 Feb 2007 10:10 - 758 of 2087

cynic - Whatever way you do it, you shoot from the hip.

Nothing wrong in that, and it does upset a few who may need to be less sensitive.

tcdmct - you can carry on believing in this company if you want to, each to their own, however the very posters who you seem so opposed to now are the one who predicted this drop in sp and the reasons why it could happen.

In fact Big Al in particular got it spot on before it happened.

You did not take notice of their views and reasons, okay, so what?

Up to you.

Meantime try to chill out a little while continuing to hold these, getting heated up and raising your blood pressure will not put things right.

cynic - 16 Feb 2007 10:16 - 759 of 2087

SWW ... i think that was a backhanded compliment, in which case thanks!

Big Al - 16 Feb 2007 23:42 - 760 of 2087

It is the eternal problem with BBs, sww. You're a hero if you call it right and everyone makes money, but try telling folk they're wrong (after a fashion) and all hell breaks loose.

My opinion of threads is that they are there for discussion on whatever subject. As ever there are pros and cons to everything and threads do not solely exist for the bulls of the stock (for example). If people were objective instead of believing they were right about a compnay regardless of the obvious then trouble would be avoided.

Personally, I'll post good and bad on any company. I'm afraid it's tough if that rubs some up the wrong way.


As for EME, it's surprising the news of testing didn't liven up the price much. It would have a few months back.

seawallwalker - 17 Feb 2007 00:28 - 761 of 2087

Big Al - "As for EME, it's surprising the news of testing didn't liven up the price much. It would have a few months back. "

Yes, seasoned posters know all this, but of course the E & P sector is being bashed for failing to come up to expectations, just look at past fund raising compared to results.

I can think of one clear example off the cuff, Hardman placing @ 98p, company bought for 78p 3 months later.

Not too bright of the institutions was it?

There are many others and if some want it I will research tomorrow.

EME is a victim of this imo.

It is a time to reduce or even sell out imo.

Time will pass and sentiment will change, but I think as with last time it will be years before it does.

So I would say, pick your oilies carefully for a LTBH.

I have!

Big Al - 17 Feb 2007 00:32 - 762 of 2087

At some time these outfits must produce a return, sww, otherwise they just dilute by raising funds to drill dry (ish) holes.

As you say, the market, and AIM in particular, is now littered with the dead and dying. You are right - EME is likely to be one of these. Any that haven't made the grade in actual discoveries by now with the sector "froth" gone has probably missed the boat.

Bummer, but s**t happens. ;-0

maestro - 17 Feb 2007 10:48 - 763 of 2087

massive sugarloaf news coming next week imho

cynic - 17 Feb 2007 15:12 - 764 of 2087

maestro ... racing certainty you have said similar on this thread before with very predictable outcome ...... what is the basis for your bullish prognostication?

maestro - 17 Feb 2007 16:39 - 765 of 2087

trust me cynic...2 weeks is nearly up

cynic - 17 Feb 2007 18:23 - 766 of 2087

of course i trust you ... lol! ...... but fortunately (i think) i do not hold these ..... have sufficient other flakey (some don't like my adjective of spivvy!) E&P stocks

hlyeo98 - 17 Feb 2007 21:10 - 767 of 2087

EME says it takes 2 months.

hlyeo98 - 17 Feb 2007 21:12 - 768 of 2087

maestro...your information is wrong. see below...



Empyrean Energy PLC
14 February 2007



Empyrean Energy PLC

('Empyrean' or the 'Company'; Ticker: (EME))


Sugarloaf Hosston Prospect, Texas USA

Testing of gas shows commences


AIM quoted Empyrean Energy PLC today announces that the Sugarloaf 1 well
testing program has now commenced.

As previously advised, the testing program will involve high density perforation
of the production casing over selected intervals in the lower part of the well.
Subject to results the program could be amended, including extended flow testing
of zones, but is expected to take up to two months to be completed.


Further releases in relation to the Sugarloaf-1 testing program will be made
upon any material developments and results from these tests.


The information contained in this announcement was completed and reviewed by the
Technical Director of Empyrean Energy Plc, Mr Frank Brophy BSc (Hons) who has
over 40 years experience as a petroleum geologist.

Big Al - 19 Feb 2007 01:04 - 769 of 2087

It's actually a fairly cleverly worded RNS that one. If you know the business and what the operation entails you could read all sorts into it.

For me the main thing is that the "reservoir" is deep and will probably be very tihght in that part of Texas, hence "high density perforation". We'll see how it goes and if it needs further stimulation. ;-0

PapalPower - 21 Feb 2007 07:34 - 770 of 2087

Might drop a little this morning with this news from Oz.... (I do not hold)


ADI -25%
EKA -13.51%


Sugarloaf-1 Well Testing Program - Lower Hosston Interval Perforated
The first part of the testing program over the lower Hosston interval has been completed by perforating several zones. As per the program design, these zones were not fracture stimulated and no flow of gas was recorded.
As envisaged in the original testing program, the next stage will involve the perforation and fracture stimulation of selected intervals of the upper Hosston sands which are interpreted to have better potential reservoir development as compared to the lower Hosston intervals. The fraccing program is currently scheduled to commence in early March.
Further ASX releases in relation to the Sugarloaf-1 testing program will be made upon any material developments and results from these tests.
Participants in the Sugarloaf-1 well are:
Eureka Energy Ltd 1
12.5%
Texas Crude Energy Inc (Operator) et al 2
41.5%
Aurora Oil & Gas Limited
20.0%
Adelphi Energy Ltd
20.0%
Empyrean Energy plc
6.0%
1 Through its wholly-owned US subsidiary, Hosston Oil & Gas LP
2 Includes other private US companies / investors

Big Al - 21 Feb 2007 19:49 - 771 of 2087

It's shaping pretty much as expected then. ;-0

They're still not dead in the water here, but I'm wondering why they didn't frac the lower interval. Then again we are not party to the detailed testing programme. The question is "why perforate then?" Definitely negative news, but then they only had 6% anyway? I gues you read it whichever way you want really.


The saga continues ............. ;-)))
Register now or login to post to this thread.