Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Chris Carson - 01 Feb 2010 17:32 - 8094 of 81564

tabasco - Spot on, I like Cable too for the same reasons but alas again as you say he is with the wrong party. No question Torys will win and still convinced it will be a landslide :o)

ExecLine - 01 Feb 2010 17:39 - 8095 of 81564

I reckon the turnout for the next general election will be utterly pathetic.

At the last one, it was around about 60% (give or take). However, this time I reckon it will only be about 40% or so. This is because the 'Expenses Fiasco', in most of the electors' minds, has 'in totality' destroyed belief in MPs of whatever party or persuasion.

We now all of us know for sure, that 90%+ of them are basically just a bunch of cheating crooks, primarily just out to feather their own nests.

Loads of them who stand again in the next election are just not going to get re-elected, per se. Q: Why? A: Just because they filled in an expenses claim in the last parliamentary period.

We need a new system of government.

I'm a Vince Cable fan too. Maybe we should just appoint the John Lewis Group to run the country. In turn, they could let Vince Cable head that department up.

Also.....I'm greatly looking forward to the new John Lewis Bank, as and when and if it comes along.

ExecLine - 01 Feb 2010 17:41 - 8096 of 81564

Because they 'are never knowingly undersold', taxes would go down for a start.

greekman - 01 Feb 2010 18:30 - 8097 of 81564

I also like and admire Vince Cable. The only reason he was not voted leader of the Lib Dems (who I feel would be so fringe group supporters it would be catastrophic), was because of his age. I feel he is one of the best of the few who are worth supporting in Parliament.
A personal view obviously.

Fred1new - 01 Feb 2010 20:17 - 8098 of 81564

I am not so sure about the outcome. The tories are showing their inadequacies more and more.

Like V. Cable could get a job in a coalition of Labour and Liberals.

I think Clegg should have waited a little longer before attempting to take the crown.

Chris Huhne would probably would have been a better stand in for 3-4 years.


The expenditure made in Britain for the last 12 years was repairing the infrastructure sold off by Maggie for the benefit of her friends.

Hospitals and school buildings have undergone fantastic improvements. So have social services.

Previous to the labour government, the rats were leaving many of the buildings, due to them being unsafe.

Mistakes have been made, which government haven't done so when making reforms.

But one thing is, even if Cameron gets in, which I doubt, there is not much of the nation's silver to sell off.

Personally, against the background I think G Brown and the labour party have done a good job with the media and press been paid to denigrate him.

But will probably be given a job in Europe or the states.

Both areas where they admire his ability.

.But one thing is that when the electioneering and examinations of false expenses claims are examined, it is going to be a dirty election.

I would have a small bet on either a hung parliament or a labour win by a very narrow majority.

I don't think when the time comes the old Etonian club will win this one and Itchy and Scratchy have little appeal for many of the middle and working classes.

Fred1new - 01 Feb 2010 23:33 - 8099 of 81564

Recent polls look better!
Might raise my bet!

greekman - 02 Feb 2010 07:55 - 8100 of 81564

Fred,

I feel the Labour Government under Blair/Brown have done more to destroy this country than any government in the last 100 years.

We have been sold down the river. Over the last 14 years we have given away more and more to the EU. We have dozens more quangos, more red tape, irrelevant laws. Labour are trying to rule all our lives. I truly believe they hate this country, and the countryside especially.
Failed on Immigration.
Failed on health (especially with the huge amount of money put in).
Failed on education (dumbing down).
Failed on Law and Punishment.
Failed on the economy.
They to me are a total failure.
If they could get away with being a dictatorship they would do.

Every day you read that they now intend to improve all the above. They have had 14 years. Just how many more do their supporters think they need.

I have never had such contempt, verging on hate for any party.

Fred1new - 02 Feb 2010 10:04 - 8101 of 81564

Greek,

Is that your unbiased opinion?
----------------------------------

"Failed on Immigration."

How would you remedy the problem. Unless of course everybody has Identity cards and "Stop and Search" and remove the necessity for Search Warrants ie. allowing immediate police entrance to any property.

I.e. a police state similar to an occupied country

Cost of doing so would be disproportionate.
-----------------------------------------------------

If your problem with immigration is false "social claims", then an computerised ID system for claimants would probably resolve the problem.

-----------------------------------------------

"Failed on health (especially with the huge amount of money put in)."

Absolute rubbish.

There are still mistakes, faults and weaknesses in the NHS, but the overall accessibility, care and advancement (costly, check the cost of a scanner etc.)
Treatment of elderly has been advanced., orthopaedics, Chest and heart disease for examples.

Many people are living today, who would have died of coronaries , asthma or led bed ridden lives.

THAT COSTS MONEY. (As said above there are still organisation problems for a TITANIC.size operation.)

----------------------------------------------

Failed on education (dumbing down).

There has been problems and too many reorganisation and the government have been guilty of trying to rum rather than walking.

But the school premises and contents have been improved.

The selling off of playing fields fiasco was a disaster but "I think" the legislation allowing for it was by the tories and use by mainly tory councils.

==========

"Failed on Law and Punishment."

Major crime rates seem to be down

================

"Failed on the economy."

Consider your living standards in the 1990 to those of the present
Working conditions, quality of housing, transport communication. Possession of disposable junk. etc. Expectancy. Cobblers.
==================================

"They to me are a total failure.

If they could get away with being a dictatorship they would do."

=============================

Reds under the bed, you aren't a member of the McCarthy party or are you?


8-)

Fred1new - 02 Feb 2010 10:07 - 8102 of 81564

Cameron is a poor clone of T. Blair, if you want another less able spiv as PM vote tory and you "may" get one.

greekman - 02 Feb 2010 10:46 - 8103 of 81564

Fred1,

I think we will have to agree to differ on most points.

But I must say that on immigration, my view is on the single fact, we are an overcrowded island, we have no room. I feel we should ban all immigration unless it can be proven the immigrant can benefit the UK. And all immigration means those from all countries. For many years I have loved Greece but due to not wishing to be that distance from family have not emigrated to that country. But if I was to apply and the Greek Government said, 'sorry we have no room' I would have to accept that. Also if I was accepted, I would expect to abide by all their laws. I would not expect to be carried by the Greek people and be supplied with housing, social security befits, interpretors and so on. The UK are the mug of the world.
If we were the worlds lifeboat, we would have sunk by now.

As to vote Tory and I may get another less able spiv, I can only agree, Yes I might. But I am willing to take that risk for my previously mentioned reason. It can't get worse (at least I hope not).

What I do respect it your obvious strong feelings. If it wasn't for the likes of you and me, we would never get change/reform. It is the silent majority that roll over and except that get me riled.

Shame Lord Such the leader of the Monster Raving Loony Party isn't still around.

Fred1new - 02 Feb 2010 12:19 - 8104 of 81564

My children, when they were young, often wished I lived in a different country.

Lord Such has morphed into Cameron and Osborne, or their more rational moments Oliver and Hardy,


8-)

Fred1new - 02 Feb 2010 12:29 - 8105 of 81564

PS. When I was a student 50 years ago, I wandered (hitch hiked) around Europe meeting in YHA students from all ove the World and Europe in particular.

I realised then that the majority of us aspired to the same ideals and hopes for ourselves and others.

Since that period I have generally though of myself as a European except when Wales is hammering England at Rugby.

Also since that time believe in the free movement or immigration of people across borders.

However, although still believing in the above I did not foresee the size of the immigration or some of the problems associated with it.

My wife is an European migrant and one of my daughters works in the home office on European immigration problems and policy. The problems are complex, sometimes bewidering and without easy resolution.

tabasco - 02 Feb 2010 12:30 - 8106 of 81564

And now Fred unfortunatelytheir wishes have been grantedyou do live in a different Countrysame name though?

Fred1new - 02 Feb 2010 12:31 - 8107 of 81564

Just looked at one line of the heading of this thread.

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish..

We certainly have.

tyketto - 02 Feb 2010 12:40 - 8108 of 81564

And they frogmarched our troops into two wars with one hand
tied behind their backs.

greekman - 02 Feb 2010 13:18 - 8109 of 81564

Been on many discussion sites/forums over the years, with the vast majority degenerating into personal attacks, foul language and the like. On this forum/site that very rarely happens. Perhaps we should form a new political party. One that allows debate to a grown up level, something that the main 3 political parties often don't appear to achieve.

I would immediately stamp out government corruption.

Of course setting up such a party would be costly. Anyone out there with a few million quid to spare. Domicility of donors not questioned. Donors will also be eligible for government posts. The level of seniority/post will obviously be determined by skill/qualification level and not on the value of their monetary donation.

Now what could we call ourselves.

tyketto - 02 Feb 2010 13:31 - 8110 of 81564

Rule Britannnia?

tabasco - 02 Feb 2010 13:51 - 8111 of 81564

Could our HQ be called The Tabernacleor TabernaI know it would be smallbut I just love the name!...we could wear a Tabard.and sit round our Tabular while discussing policymaybe have our own Tabloid?of course talking about Mr. Brown would be Taboohow about a pet Catand call him Tabby.and for lunch we could eat the healthy Tabbouleh.all in favour?

mnamreh - 02 Feb 2010 13:56 - 8112 of 81564

.

tabasco - 02 Feb 2010 14:05 - 8113 of 81564

Namrehyou must have a large Da-TAB-ank?
Register now or login to post to this thread.