pthwaite
- 20 Sep 2004 10:27
CEY is a gold mining company operating in Egypt. It was ordered by the Egyptian Government to stop drilling pending a legal dispute brought against the company by a government minister.
Since then, the whole Government cabinet was replaced a few months ago and the minister now in charge of Mining is believed to be positive on Western investment in the country. CEY are pushing for this minister to allow them to continue drilling ASAP; investers are waiting....patiently.
As soon as the company gets the go-ahead to continue drilling, the share price will move north; CEY has plenty of gold in this mine and it is (apparantly) the case of "raking" it out rather than drilling for it!
Check them out...worthy of a punt.
HARRYCAT
- 05 May 2011 19:44
- 813 of 2354
Must surely be approaching a good buying opportunity {from a charting perspective?}.
halifax
- 05 May 2011 21:04
- 814 of 2354
results not terribly exciting considering the market cap of 1bn
skinny
- 16 May 2011 07:20
- 815 of 2354
Corrected!
required field
- 16 May 2011 08:32
- 816 of 2354
Might be time to buy back in.....looking at the charts, hitting perhaps a low and gold is holding up well.
aldwickk
- 16 May 2011 08:33
- 817 of 2354
Skinny
Your on the wrong thread , this the CEY thread.
required field
- 16 May 2011 08:35
- 818 of 2354
Going long now....as this is unhedged with capital growing...
skinny
- 16 May 2011 08:39
- 819 of 2354
Aldwickk - now corrected!
aldwickk
- 16 May 2011 12:43
- 820 of 2354
Thanks Skinny
HARRYCAT
- 18 May 2011 12:33
- 821 of 2354
Possible read across to other assets in Egypt:
Credit Suisse comment
"Law to be a positive catalyst if passed: We believe that it is clear that the military is trying to put an end to the ongoing legal disputes with regards to private investors who purchased government assets (at favorable terms in some cases), which is significantly damaging private sector investments in Egypt. Based on local media reports, the law should result in only holding liable the government official who sold the asset, with no liability on the private investor who purchased the asset. However, we still wouldnt rule out the possibility that some investors/companies could still pay some kind of settlement fee to the government in some cases.
Real estate sector to be the main beneficiary: The real estate sector has been the most negatively affected since the political turmoil started in Egypt given the significant magnitude of legal disputes over land ownership which was purchased by developers from the former government. This has put the real estate market in a stand still mode with no buying activity as well as rising cancellations rates for properties purchased during 2010. Real estate stocks have been suffering on the back of this, thus underperforming EGX 30 by about 31% year to date, on average. We believe that passing this law should be a positive catalyst for real estate stocks as it would restore confidence in developers ability to deliver contacted properties."
cynic
- 18 May 2011 16:33
- 823 of 2354
that's what my wife said
maggiebt4
- 18 May 2011 16:53
- 824 of 2354
Hope she thought your candle looked nice too!
cynic
- 18 May 2011 16:59
- 825 of 2354
she shut her eyes and refused to look ..... so i gave her a surprise
midknight
- 31 May 2011 09:53
- 826 of 2354
From Traders thread:
Goldman: Reiterated conviction buy, TP: Reiterated 290
required field
- 14 Jun 2011 08:45
- 827 of 2354
Starting to look like a very cheap share with gold rising.....to me anyway.....
hlyeo98
- 14 Jun 2011 10:58
- 828 of 2354
Yeah. I almost forgot about CEY. This does look extremely cheap now for a company producing gold.
Buying into this today.
HARRYCAT
- 14 Jun 2011 11:10
- 829 of 2354
Political uncertainty still holding this down, imo. Until that is sorted (sept I think), to the satisfaction of all, no hurry to get in here.
hlyeo98
- 14 Jun 2011 13:20
- 830 of 2354
When Sept comes, CEY would not remain at this price.
HARRYCAT
- 14 Jun 2011 13:43
- 831 of 2354
I agree, but that assumes the elections go smoothly, with an acceptable outcome and the new political leaders don't then decide to change the tax structure or contract details. Don't forget that the government own 50% of the controlling company.
hlyeo98
- 14 Jun 2011 13:47
- 832 of 2354
That's the point. They wouldn't want a company partly owned by them going down the drain.