Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Amazing (not) Freds reply to proper questions strangely absent. No doubt we will be treated to some spurious garbage later when no ones looking ;O)))

Ooops spoke to soon :o)

Isaacs,

Could be referring to the flouting of International Law by Israel and the killing and maiming of civilians "Adults an Children" by their illegal use of Phosphorus Bombs in Gaza.

But that would be a distraction.

(But watch the flies gather.)

CC. I think it is time you went to the water closet again.

Perhaps, it will give you time to recognise where you left your brain last time

Fred are you trying to take over from Mrsi???

Fred = Kept my part of the deal, have I abused you I dont think so, you as usual revert to type and dodge the question and lob in your usual insults. I rest my case your worships! :o)

CC,

I suggest you review your postings and then rethink.

Perhaps, you don't recognise when you are being abusive.

In general I do, and they are intentional.

Simply put, when you are being personal try to distinguish between the subject, object an the act

Also try to avoid be sycophantic.

So what you saying Fred? Your ramblings are deliberately offensive? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt MISGUIDED perhaps?

Fredfirst point I did not like Maggiesecond at the time of the meeting when the decision to sell the gold was announced senior executives from at least two big investment banks were presentBrown was notit has been documented they advised the timing of the decision as ludicrousthey claimed We thought it was a disastrous decision; we couldnt understand it. We brought up a lot of potential problems at the meetingbut Brown no listen thirdnot many countries reduced their Gold reserves around that timemaybe Switzerlandbut not surefourth 1999 marked the peak for North Sea oil productionBritain was pumping around 2.8m barrels of oil every daythats a lot of revenuefifththe living standards have been supported by the credit crazy Bankers have given out.and that ended in tears... now let me say what I think Mr. Brown and this Government has done for us all gave away billions of taxpayers money to the bankersdont mention the Gold againdont mention the Wars.more billions gave Britain away to the EU threw more billions away in bureaucratic ideasthe Treasury has also given permission to print shedloads more moneyI wouldnt back Brown if he was up against a one legged man in an arse kicking contestand he wouldnt be favouritejust opinion though Fred.nothing more

Not forgetting he wasnt democratically voted in by the British public as our Prime Ministerperhaps thats the electoral reform................we vote not the party for a PM if mid-term?

Looks like I spoke too soon re adult conversation without the insults. And that comment is aimed at more than one poster. Please don't let this thread degenerate to the level of some on MoneyAm.

The problem is one offensive insult often attracts a reply in the same vein.

CC>
If, or when, I respond to you in an abusive manner, it is in generally in response to personal remarks, which you seem to delight in, when you post on the various threads concerning me.

I make no apologies for doing so.

I have no objection to having any argument I advance being savaged, dismantled, debunk in a serious, humorous, or jocular manner, but in general, I do not like personal denigration of myself, or others.

I do debunk my own arguments, stances and allegiances more frequently than you may suppose. Generally, it is with a chuckle.

However, as the majority know, many of the arguments, which I advance, are tongue in cheek.

But what does get up my nose, since I was very young, is the ganging up by some, who attempt to bully, or abuse others.

Luckily, I am a lot bigger and thicker skinned than most, and it has not been a problem for me.

Your remarks about me are of no consequence, but once again I suggest you reread your postings.
If what I have written is irrelevant to you, so be it.

Greek.Fred is passionate with his viewsand that is greatI agree with a lot he says [Gaza]sometimes he changes my mind with subjects in the balanceI hope he listens to some points I make? we all want a better Britainsome disagree on how to achieve thisI wont a saybut not the last saygoing to the west wing now for a glass of whitetoodle pip

Greek, yes Dad.

But, But, But.


I have this vision of Maggie and Tabs, going up or down the aisle together!

Back to the charts!

Maggie could have prevented a War Fredand she is a 100 years older than meI dare say you would lend her one? lol

Tabs,

The only thing I would lend Maggie, is a plot in the back garden.

The one next to Arthur's.

I do read your comments (and learn), but haven't started hearing them.

One thing I learned is that I am glad I stopped backing horses 53 years ago!

(I worked out I was spending 4 hours a day, reading the papers looking at books and not making a buck. Decided to listen to the lectures on probability.

Fred1,

As I have previously said, you are obviously passionate about your views. I don't have any problem with those views. I may disagree with most of them re the political comments but I have enjoyed the debate. Please don't think I was having a go at anyone, its just as said I do enjoy the debate and want to continue doing so.

Regards to all. Supporters of Labour/Conservatives/Greens/UKIP/Communists/ and the Liberals (OK perhaps not the Liberals).

FredFreudian slip15-love.BTWif you know what you are doingwhich I sometimes doyou can back a horsetrade itand make your money before the race is even runyou need to have a vast form librarybe prepared for hours of workwith no guarantees and a mind programmed to understand racing..ahhhh boring myself.