goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
Fred1new
- 17 Mar 2010 13:46
- 8524 of 81564
Kayak.
Also, a lot of children's morals come from their peers. If they hang out with peers who have similar discipline issues, it's not a surprise they try to fit in.
==========
Much of what the peers are doing is that shown to them in the media. The gangs or group then tries to emulate what has been demonstrated to them.
The media being driven by "profit", not morality.
=============
Tabby,
Ten years olds have not got the ability to take stock of themselves and decide on a set of morals for themselves..so you are saying they have no responsibility for any of their actions?therefore violence is going to be inevitableif in their make-up
Violence is within all our natures, as demonstrated by legalised killing ie. War.
The drive remains instinctual, but hopefully not often used.
Containment, or constraint of the violent impulses, needs to be integrated into children at a young age and continually be re-enforced.
Preferably this is not done by punishment by reward for more gainful behaviour.
The impulse sublimated and diversified into more productive methods of obtaining more valuable goals, rather than remaining purely destructive.
======
I feel lucky that I had parents who didnt physically punish me.
I knew, when, or what I was doing, was being frowned on and generally stopped doing so. At least , while I was within their view.
My father would also explain to me why he thought my behaviour was less than expected and the consequences of it to myself and others of continuing it.
It taught me awareness of others and to have respect of their feelings.
Although, not necessarily to be restricted by that understanding.
-========-
We attempted to bring up our children in a similar manner. Although the question why was sometimes a B. Nuisance.
Thankfully our grand children are being brought up in a similar manner and will avoid to much trouble.
-----------
Fred1new
- 17 Mar 2010 13:46
- 8525 of 81564
.
Fred1new
- 17 Mar 2010 14:09
- 8526 of 81564
cc.
Bring back the stocks and hanging for driving offences. That will stop the Bs, first time. No re-offending allowed.
Sort them out once and for all.
Catch them young before they have a chance to offend. We all know the families which shouldn't be allowed to breed!
mnamreh
- 17 Mar 2010 14:19
- 8527 of 81564
.
mnamreh
- 17 Mar 2010 14:21
- 8528 of 81564
.
Kayak
- 17 Mar 2010 14:37
- 8529 of 81564
To be fair, I think Fred was being sarcastic. Mind you I know of one family who shouldn't have been allowed to breed :-)
Chris Carson
- 17 Mar 2010 14:44
- 8530 of 81564
Only one Kayak? You should get out more :o)
Chris Carson
- 17 Mar 2010 14:44
- 8531 of 81564
Only one Kayak? You should get out more :o)
Chris Carson
- 17 Mar 2010 14:45
- 8532 of 81564
Only one Kayak? You should get out more :o)
Chris Carson
- 17 Mar 2010 14:48
- 8533 of 81564
There's a parrot in ere!
Chris Carson
- 17 Mar 2010 14:49
- 8534 of 81564
There's a parrot in ere!
Chris Carson
- 17 Mar 2010 14:50
- 8535 of 81564
There's a parrot in ere!
Fred1new
- 17 Mar 2010 15:05
- 8536 of 81564
CC, Flap your wings and leave then!
mnamreh
- 17 Mar 2010 15:09
- 8537 of 81564
.
Fred1new
- 17 Mar 2010 15:10
- 8538 of 81564
I think I would go back to the system of guilty by association or as up north by naming.
Preferably after a mention in the Sun.
Kayak, ????????
Fred1new
- 17 Mar 2010 15:15
- 8539 of 81564
I would bring back guilt by association or named and hang all who disagree with me.
Or if you are up north, those mentioned in the Sun.
Weren't Kayak and Cameron mentioned in the Sun??????????????
Fred1new
- 17 Mar 2010 15:16
- 8540 of 81564
I would bring back guilt by association or named and hang all who disagree with me.
Or if you are up north, those mentioned in the Sun.
Weren't Kayak and Cameron mentioned in the Sun??????????????
Fred1new
- 17 Mar 2010 15:18
- 8541 of 81564
What is wrong?
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 17 Mar 2010 15:34
- 8542 of 81564
test
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 17 Mar 2010 15:34
- 8543 of 81564
test