goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
This_is_me
- 30 Apr 2010 23:58
- 8983 of 81564
Last month a world-wide survey was conducted by the UN.
The only question asked was:-
"Would you please give your honest opinion about solutions to the food shortage in the rest of the world?"
The survey was a huge failure because of the following:
1. In Eastern Europe they didn't know what "honest" meant.
2. In Western Europe they didn't know what "shortage" meant.
3. In Africa they didn't know what "food" meant.
4. In China they didn't know what "opinion" meant.
5. In the Middle East they didn't know what "solution" meant.
6. In South America they didn't know what "please" meant.
7. In the USA they didn't know what "the rest of the world" meant.
8. In Australia they hung up as soon as they heard the Indian accent.
This_is_me
- 01 May 2010 00:06
- 8984 of 81564
The only way to solve the economic problems involves realising that out country is not rich enough to afford all that we would like. It involves getting out of the EU so that we can slash red tape, axing around a third of government jobs (over a few years) slashing benefits and encouraging people to save and not borrow money just to spend on holidays, cars, entertainment etc. Ignoring fools like Fred would also help.
Fred1new
- 01 May 2010 09:55
- 8985 of 81564
TIM,
Oh, little Englander, have you not learnt anything from the economic chaos created by lack of international regulation and implementation sufficient of present regulations.
The abuses by the Bankers and Financial Intelligentsia and other greedy followers, who were out for a quick buck, are primarily responsible for the present situation.
They thrived on instability.
Regulations are needed for the running of an efficient society.
The problem is knowing which regulations are useful and which should be modified.
In the present economic situation more political and economic cooperation is needed.
In spite of its present problems the EU could develop to be a useful stabilising block, both politically and economically.
I have no doubt, that you will disagree with all of the above and I can see that the "grab and run philosophy", with its disregard of others, as more appealing to you.
Don't drink to much lager as well?
Good luck.
Fred1new
- 01 May 2010 10:15
- 8986 of 81564
If it is a hung parliament, in spite of what Clegg and Cameron are saying at the moment, I doubt that the Liberal party's morality would allow them to form a coalition government with the present isolationist tory party.
Somebody, has just said to me, "what a mess it will be if the Cameron gets elected". That was the perception of Wishy Washy, from an eight year old, without prompting.
2517GEORGE
- 01 May 2010 11:28
- 8987 of 81564
Morning Fred--The problem with being a 'staunchie' of whatever party, your's happens to be labour, is that they close their eyes to any/all indiscretions by their party, but do the opposite for the other party's. The same applies to ideas and policies, they are rubbished out of hand if their not from the chosen following, and engratiated if they are.
2517
Kayak
- 01 May 2010 11:35
- 8988 of 81564
"confirmation bias"
mnamreh
- 01 May 2010 15:23
- 8989 of 81564
.
Kayak
- 01 May 2010 15:55
- 8990 of 81564
No, that's the one Execline keeps banging on about :-)
Fred1new
- 01 May 2010 19:30
- 8991 of 81564
25,
Inaccurate again. Other than when I work for the NCB and paid the levy, I have never a Labour party supporter or member, also I have never voted for them.
At the moment, I agree with a large number of the present labour party policies and much of what they have done while in government.
Also have sympathies for some of the Liberal and Green Party's policies.
============
Cameron turned his bask on his own and Porky's indiscretions. Paid back the money some money for false claims and now wishes to crack down on unemployment benefits.
I think he should have been prosecuted. If he worked in local government as an employee he probably would have been.
Hypocrisy of the first order.
Tory backers avoid British taxes and buy votes in the hope of a "government", what else do they want to dodge.
To many what they are doing is seen as corruption and doesn't say much for a future bought tory government, if they were to attain office.
===========
I hope there is a hung government as I predicted in May 2009.
At that time, I believe from memory Haystacks (the intellectual giant) predicted a tory landslide.
Haystack
- 01 May 2010 20:13
- 8992 of 81564
Not a landslide, but a majority. And I still predict that. One poll today puts the Conservatives 10 points ahead. Labour is still a poor 3rd. One poll pots them on 24%. That's the worst showing since 1918.
Gillian Duffy has said in an interview tat she is not voting at all and has not posted her vote. The interview is with The Mail on Sunday.
"He wanted me to go outside with him and shake his hands for the camera but I said no," she told the newspaper.
BIGOT = Brown Is Gone On Thursday
2517GEORGE
- 02 May 2010 09:26
- 8993 of 81564
IMV it's only the army of benefit dependent voters created by labour that will prevent a landslide victory for the tories. Up to a million of which are youngsters, many of them have absolutely no inclination of getting a job and are happy to remain on benefits indefinitely. Until going to work is actually more beneficial than relying on handouts, this will not change. T I M 's post 8986, the first sentence is spot on.
Morning Fred----re 'Inaccurate again' you have an obvious hate for all things tory, and love of all things labour, as for saying you are not a labour supporter your posts say otherwise, as far as I know you happen to be the first non voting 'staunchie' I have exchanged views with.
2517
Fred1new
- 02 May 2010 09:51
- 8994 of 81564
25,
Check the meaning of bigot and zealot and see if either or both apply to yourself.
Also check the meaning of irrational, which I think suits your rants to a tee.
2517GEORGE
- 02 May 2010 11:08
- 8995 of 81564
Fred--Bigot --one blindly and obstinately devoted to a particular creed or party.
Zealot--An enthusiast, a fanatic.
Irrational--not reasonable, absurd, not logical.
Recognise anyone?
I don't think any of my posts could be considered as rants, if you point them out I'll gladly reassess, but hey, I don't mind you having yours.
2517
aldwickk
- 02 May 2010 11:28
- 8996 of 81564
Will Wall street be open tomorrow ?
aldwickk
- 02 May 2010 11:33
- 8997 of 81564
Bigot --one blindly and obstinately devoted to a particular creed or party.
Zealot--An enthusiast, a fanatic.
Irrational--not reasonable, absurd, not logical.
Recognise anyone?
Yes , anybody who will be voting Labour.
aldwickk
- 02 May 2010 12:57
- 8999 of 81564
Thank's MM
greekman
- 02 May 2010 13:10
- 9000 of 81564
Fred,
You ask, "Who would I prefer to employ, a person who doesn't want to work in a job he dislikes, or a person who wishes to work at any reasonable employment, which is offered him even if he dislikes it".
I would prefer the second option, but if someone does 'not' want to work, full stop, and there are many out there, I would make them take the first option, if they would not take the second, sooner than allow continual sponging of the state.
You say that "You not think there is any money to be saved through efficiency measures, if it causes an increase in unemployment". So what you are saying is we must keep everyone employed no matter how none productive and wastefull that job is. We must cut so called none jobs
You also say, "In a period of full employment cutting numbers of individuals working inefficiently would normally increase productivity and therefore, may produce increased gross income. Different circumstances and different arguments".
I do agree with that comment, but that has nothing to do with the cutting of a job that is non productive. Your comment is about workers being none productive. Of course you can have a person being productive, just say turning out useless but government required reports, and it is these type of jobs that have to go.
Turning your augment on it's head, why not create more none jobs, so that everyone is employed no matter how much of a None Job they are doing.
As to my views on several other points you made, I have stated them several times so won't repeat. What I will say is I have enjoyed (although I have had difficulty sometimes keeping my temper) the debates on here, including yours. I have also never read any bigoted comment in your posts.
See you on the barricades.
Fred1new
- 02 May 2010 14:48
- 9001 of 81564
Aldwicck,
Following up on Post 8999.
As it is probable that more than 60% of the electorate are not going to vote for the tories, would you consider the 60% irrational, bigoted zealots.
Interesting, using your argument there appears to me to be a detachment of some from "common reality".
(The mark of the bigoted, who shout their slogans and adhere to false arguments, and usually unsubstantiated beliefs. Of course that is their right,
But, perhaps, it would be sensible to consider on which side of the bars you are.
But again being credulous, you will probably be that I am from another planet again.
(Be careful, bunker down England, the aliens may be coming.)
That is, if they are not here already.
That is scary!
greekman
- 02 May 2010 16:48
- 9002 of 81564
No wonder the cost of Passports are so high.
This was actually taken from a UK passport application and a member of staff coppied it, as it made her laugh all day.
Dear Minister,
I'm in the process of renewing my passport but I am a total loss to understand or believe the hoops I am being asked to jump through.
How is it that Bert Smith of T.V. Rentals Basingstoke has my address and telephone number and knows that I bought a satellite dish from them back in 1994, and yet, the Government is still asking me where I was born and on what date?
How come that nice West African immigrant chappy who comes round every Thursday night with his DVD rentals van can tell me every film or video I have had out since he started his business up eleven years ago, yet you still want me to remind you of my last three jobs, two of which were with contractors working for the government?
How come the T.V. detector van can tell if my T.V. is on, what channel I am watching and whether I have paid my licence or not, and yet if I win the government run lottery they have no idea I have won or where I am and will keep the bloody money to themselves if I fail to claim in good time.
Do you people do this by hand?
You have my birth date on numerous files you hold on me, including the one with all the income tax forms I've filed for the past 30-odd years. It's on my health insurance card, my driver's licence, on the last four passports I've had, on all those stupid customs declaration forms I've had to fill out before being allowed off the planes and boats over the last 30 years, and all those insufferable census forms that are done every ten years and the electoral registration forms I have to complete, by law, every time our lords and masters are up for re-election. I served in the armed forces for more than 25 years including over ten years at the Ministry of Defence in London.
I have had security clearances which allowed me to sit in the Cabinet Office, five seats away from the Prime Minister while he was being briefed on the first Gulf War and I have been doing volunteer work for the British Red Cross ever since I left the Services. However, I have to get someone 'important' to verify who I am -- you know, someone like my doctor...who, before he got his medical degree 6 months ago WAS LIVING IN PAKISTAN...
Would somebody please take note, once and for all, I was born in Maidenhead on the 4th of March 1957, my mother's name is Mary, her maiden name was Reynolds, my father's name is Robert, and I'd be absolutely astounded if that ever changed between now and the day I die!
I apologise Minister. I'm obviously not myself this morning. But between you and me, I have simply had enough! You mail the application to my house, then you ask me for my address. What is going on? Do you have a gang of Neanderthals working there? Look at my damn picture. Do I look like Bin Laden? I don't want to activate the Fifth Reich for God's sake! I just want to go and park my weary backside on a sunny, sandy beach for a couple of week's well-earned rest away from all this crap.
Well, I have to go now, because I have to go to back to Salisbury and get another copy of my birth certificate because you lost the last one, AND to the tune of 60 quid! What a racket THAT is!! Would it be so complicated to have all the services in the same spot to assist in the issuance of a new passport the same day? But nooooo, that'd be too damn easy and maybe make sense. You'd rather have us running all over the place like chickens with our heads cut off, then find some tosser to confirm that it's really me on the goddamn picture - you know... the one where we're not allowed to smile in case we look as if we are enjoying the process!
Hey, you know why we can't smile? 'Cause we're totally jacked off!
Yours sincerely,
An Irate British Citizen.