tobyboy
- 01 Aug 2007 09:25
there seems to be some heavy resistance around these level with a lot of potential upside.
cpeck12
- 09 Nov 2007 15:27
- 9 of 290
Holding up pretty well. Not bad for income I think.
halifax
- 09 Nov 2007 17:24
- 10 of 290
If you want income buy UK banks now!
cpeck12
- 13 Nov 2007 13:55
- 11 of 290
Seems like good value to me like I said earlier. Anyone?
cpeck12
- 13 Nov 2007 15:05
- 12 of 290
And for those who are still concern with Avandia, it is not that bad after all. See:
http://www.reuters.com/article/health-SP/idUSL1214902720071113
Greyhound
- 13 Nov 2007 15:09
- 13 of 290
It's the pipeline and the dollar effect that is causing the lacklustre performance imo.
cpeck12
- 13 Nov 2007 15:37
- 14 of 290
Thought GSK has got one of the largest pipeline?
Greyhound
- 14 Nov 2007 17:51
- 15 of 290
Promising update on Avandia just out for you...
cpeck12
- 15 Nov 2007 08:39
- 16 of 290
Avandia is going to have similar recovery play as Crestor if not better, I suspect. Btw, Asia type 2 diabetes is now growing at an alarming rate. GSK will be able to take advantage on these markets with Andrew on the CEO role.
cpeck12
- 15 Nov 2007 13:24
- 17 of 290
Pound took a turn at 2.11 last friday due to widening trade deficit. Suspect that's the peak. So, this share could be better than putting money in the bank.
cpeck12
- 22 Nov 2007 10:19
- 18 of 290
Took a turn today after a few broker recommendations. Still cheap IMO.
Greyhound
- 22 Nov 2007 10:24
- 19 of 290
Personally I think you won't see that much of a stronger dollar until 2009. FX markets always overrun too.
cpeck12
- 03 Dec 2007 08:13
- 20 of 290
And this is what I call a great company! See below:
Glaxo to offer 2 mln stg packages, board seats to Viehbacher, Stout - report
AFX
LONDON (Thomson Financial) - Pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline is to offer 2 mln stg retention packages and seats on the board to Chris Viehbacher and David Stout, who missed out on becoming chief executive, an effort to keep them at the company, the Sunday Times reported without citing sources.
Viehbacher, who runs the group's US pharmaceuticals division, and David Stout, the president of pharmaceutical operations, missed out on the CEO's job when Andrew Witty was appointed to lead the group two months ago.
The group, the paper reported, has told investors that the share packages will be handed out to Viehbacher and Stout over the next two to three years. There will also be a small cash payment, the paper reported, without giving details.
alexander.ferguson@thomson.com
greekman
- 08 Jan 2008 07:48
- 21 of 290
FDA Approves 19 New U.S. Drugs, Fewest Since '83; Glaxo Leads
By Justin Blum
Jan. 8 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved 19 new drugs in 2007, the fewest in 24 years, after drugmakers focused on developing uses for existing products.
"The hurdle has been raised, there is no question about it,'' said Jean-Pierre Garnier, Glaxo's chief executive officer, in an Oct. 24 conference call with analysts. ``We are working on 25 launches over the next three years. Some of them will be delayed that probably wouldn't have been delayed if we had those 25 products even two years ago.''
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a2MOCNVDHucs&refer=home
END of Report.
As to the bribery issue it appears that 2,200 companies from some 40 countries are suspected of colluding with Saddam's regime to bilk the humanitarian program of $1.8 billion.
Anyone who believes anything will come of any investigation with so many companies involved is IMHO living in dream land.
I would think the number of companies that went down the legal moral route are far less than those who didn't.
The bottom line is that to get any sort of deal with a corrupt country (and there are very few that are not) bribery is often a companies best bargaining chip. On a lesser scale if you want to deal with so called none corrupt countries it's called incentives, corruption by a lesser name.
The Authorities will make a lot of noise and spend a lot of our money, then everything will just fade away.
Cynicism rules.
cpeck12
- 01 Feb 2008 09:20
- 22 of 290
Looks like a base is formed and we're heading for a bounce. A good share in difficult times like now.
Falcothou
- 01 Feb 2008 10:06
- 23 of 290
Might be worth puuting a limit order in for 1150, it seems a good support and was hit yesterday
Guscavalier
- 01 Feb 2008 20:45
- 24 of 290
Glaxo has around 30 drugs in the later stages of development which may hopefully counter worries about patent expiries. Glaxo is also a major US$ earner and may improve earnings in Sterling terms should the latter weaken against the US$ this year. Yield should be solid 4%+ at current sp of 1184p
cpeck12
- 07 Feb 2008 11:59
- 25 of 290
The base is now much clearer. Anyone in the party? Maybe not..
Greyhound
- 07 Feb 2008 16:34
- 26 of 290
Not a good picture of health imo.
Falcothou
- 15 Feb 2008 13:51
- 27 of 290
LONDON (Thomson Financial) - US billionaire Warren Buffett has invested significantly in European pharmaceutical majors GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi-Aventis, a filing to the US Securities and Exchange Commission has revealed.
As of December 31, Buffett, through his holding company Berkshire Hathaway, owned 1.51 mln American Depository Receipts of Glaxo, valued at 76.1 mln usd, and 3.6 mln ADRs of Sanofi-Aventis, valued at 162.5 mln usd.
Since January 2, Glaxo has issued a profit warning and its shares have fallen 11.5 pct from 1,270 pence to 1,124 pence by 9.26 am today.
Shares in Sanofi-Aventis have slid by 14.7 pct from 62.28 eur on January 2, to 53.1 eur at 9.32 am today.
The trades, however, represent a very small part of Buffett's total investments, worth a total of 68.8 bln usd, for the three months ending Dec 31 that are covered by the filing.
Investments included a stake worth 7.9 bln usd in American Express and 4.1 bln usd holding in Johnson & Johnson.
greekman
- 22 Feb 2008 17:08
- 28 of 290
Strange re the drop today. I would have thought the news was far more positive than negative. 15 mill buy just gone through. No doubt an RNS will be forthcoming.