Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Fred,

As you think coalitions are good, how about me, you and both our wives.

Oops forgot this is a public thread. We may both get better offers, so better not go there.

Greek

Greek,

If you saw me, you would think I wouldn't get any offers.

That is what my wife says!

I have 4 daughters and know what coalition means.

I can't get any of my major policies through.


edited.

Before opting for Fred, you should explore all other offers of such a coalition.

With Gordon being prepared to stand down, what chances a Lib/Lab coalition now.

How about Alistair Darling as PM and Vince as Chancellor and Cameron as doorman to No 10.

----------------

Hays, could find a job as gardener.

PS.

Hilary as a cook, as it appears she is so fond of recipes.

That should stir things up a bit and keep her occupied.

8-)

Fred
Are you any good at cleaning toilets? I wouldn't want to clean it after Gord has been in there though.

I could use you for the brush.

Not that you would notice.

PS.

I have cleared up a lot of messes in my time.

Got well paid for it.

After Nick Clegg stated only a week ago that PR would not be a prerequisite of his party backing another in the case of a hung parliament, and his statement that he would seek to back the party that secured the most votes and seats, he has now lost all credibility. Although he also stated he would put the country before party, he is in talks with Labour, a party that received fewer seats than the Conservatives and also about 2,000,000 votes less, meaning the country on average did not want a Labour Government.
If the deal is done between the parties than came second and third, it will eventually result in a Prime Minister that for the second consecutive time has no mandate to rule.

Nick Clegg appears to have less moral fibre than Gordon Brown had, and thats saying something.
Politicians just looking out for themselves, now where have we heard that before.

The names change, the politics don't.

I think he's just strengthening his negotiating position by having two irons in the fire.

"two irons" thats a bit harsh :-)

Greek,

64% of the electorate voted against the tories.

A rainbow coalition would be attractive with blue on the outside.

I think G Brown is doing the decent thing.

Perhaps, Wisteria should do the same thing before the grandees put their knives in. (He could go back to Eton and learn how accounts. (His own I mean.)

Osborne, could step into his shoes.

Very good result with improving prospects every hour.

Now put that glass down before you break it!

8-)

Fred, surely that can't be right? I thought that 71% of the electorate had voted against Labour, correct me if I'm wrong.

Reminds me of a half empty glass.

I am an optimist.

A Lib-Lab pact would be a coalition of losers.

Disappointing result for the UKIP even if they increased their share of the vote by a third. At least the so called Liberal so called Democrats made no progress.

My guess is another election by Oct.

Fred,

But as said by Kayak, far more voted against Labour, so your argument does not hold water.
It is a fact that Labour came second to the Tories, in both seats and votes, and it is solely for that reason a Lab/Lib pact is morally wrong.
I also heard Gordon Brown biographer say on BBC this AM that the country voted for a coalition. What a plonker. No one voted for a coalition, on the whole they voted for the three main parties. If we end up with a coalition it will only be a result of how things ended up, not because the population intended it.
I have spoken to several Labour voters, including a life long supporter, who is honest enough to admit that a Lab/lib pact would go against our so called democratic process.
Just imagine if Lab and got together with the Libs and discussed this issue on the possibility of a hung parliament prior to the election (I appreciate all 3 parties would have had their own plan) and it had become public knowledge that if Labour came second the Lib's would side with them.
Voters would have been shouting that no matter how they voted, if the result was as now, it would be a stitch-up.
I repeat, how can a party that came second (lost) with an unelected PM be our political rulers only by the backing of the party that came third (lost).
And if this does come off, we will have another unelected PM.
The public voice is being well and truly strangled.

remember that we are still waiting for one more result

Yes, but it won't make any difference.

the media will say it will be an approval rating on any coalition