Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

This_is_me - 13 May 2010 13:48 - 9142 of 81564

We wouldn't have a budget deficet if we were not paying one hundred and twenty thousand million to the EU to keep the Greeks et al. in the style that they do not deserve and have not earned. I am expecting the Euro to fall apart in a few years when it becomes obvious that the Greeks have not changed their ways and owe even more money than they do at present. It is noticable that the FT, which for years tried to persuade the country to join the Euro has quietly dropped its stance, but then they are nearly always well behind things in their thinking. The UKIP members are the sensible ones.

P.S I no longer read Fred's posts as I have better thing sto do with my time and now that I make my money on the markets I no longer have to suffer fools at all, and certainly not gladly.

Fred1new - 13 May 2010 13:51 - 9143 of 81564

TIM.

You must have difficulty living with yourself.

Camelot - 13 May 2010 14:03 - 9144 of 81564

I would have thought it was you Fred who had difficulty living with himself

when you grow up and look back on what your views are now, you will be very surprised how they will have changed

Haystack - 13 May 2010 14:09 - 9145 of 81564

Greece has rwetirement at 55 and various other abusrd benefits. France is in a similar position. They need to get a dose of reality if they expect any help.

Fred1new - 13 May 2010 15:05 - 9146 of 81564

Kayak,

You asked me a question and I will try an answer, although you may not understand what I write.

I have followed the careers of many politicians, from numerous parties over varying periods of time and tried to understand their motivations and ideals for doing what they did or do. It should be obvious, by now, that I do not necessarily agree with all their ideals, or actions. That is one reason why I do not have any particular tribal allegiance, or membership.

Although, I am an atheist, I was instilled at a early age with some Christian values, which included respect of others, belief in the community, of trying not being abusive, or utilising the vulnerabilities of others for my own unfair personal gain. (It is obvious that, I have not always lived up to those ideals, but at least I was observant of those values, and attempts were and are made.)

Those values remain core feelings, although, as can be seen, I am prepared to be intellectually amoral in discussion, but I do consider for advancement of a society, that the core values I mentioned above would be sensible standards and lead to a more harmonious, and therefore safer ongoing society.

For myself, offspring and their children, it would seem a more preferable society, to the grab it for oneself, and run society which is developing.

This doesnt discount those who obtain advantages, by work, and the use of the attributes they possess and have developed, but there is a necessary balance to rewards and they have to take the whole of society consideration and carry it as a whole.

(This doesnt have to be so, but I would prefer it to be, as I dont want a society where one has to constantly look over ones shoulders.)

(I feel Brown had similar core value and his policies were aimed in that direction, but he is a political beast and restrained by his chosen art.)

Development, of an inclusive society, is problematic and certainly full of difficulties, as witnessed.

Inequalities of basic rights, and/or, even expectancies, make it more difficult for it to be attained.

I may be mistaken, but I dont think that the present tory party holds the values I wish for this country. That fortunately remains their right,.





Haystack - 13 May 2010 15:10 - 9147 of 81564

Fred
Such rubbish you post here.

Fred1new - 13 May 2010 15:12 - 9148 of 81564

Camelot,

No difficulty, I am often amused at myself and my actions, but I am not frightened to review and question my opinions and actions.

Never felt any need of the herd, in order to hold an opinion, although certainly observant of it, when forming my opinions.


Fred1new - 13 May 2010 15:22 - 9149 of 81564

Greek,

Many don't and see only "black and "white" or "them" from "there".

Tim.

I don't think the Euro zone or the Euro will collapse,and expect it to rise above their present problems. To complicated to fail.

Not so sure about the economy of the UK.

I think the UK is in for a far rougher time than many expect.

Interesting to see, NIC, is to go up as in the form of Personal Tax, CGT is going to go up. VAT is to go up and in spite and in spite of everything Personal taxation will go up.

Services are to be cut and unemployment to increase with depression of the housing market.

May strengthen the Pound for a while, but will depress exports.

Interesting.









Fred1new - 13 May 2010 15:26 - 9150 of 81564

Hays,

I didn't expect you to understand, or even want to.

One wife had a lucky break.

Go back, to your prophesies and insider knowledge of the tories and electoral system, you will feel at home there.
=============

I will go back to getting ready for my next wanderings.

France

8-)


The smile is for France.

Haystack - 13 May 2010 15:56 - 9151 of 81564

You seem to misunderstand almost everything and are more blinkered than most of the politicians.

The Conservatives are pro business and try to help business. they are pro people making money. These attitudes do not preclude them being interested in the wellfare of the population. The only way the lives of the majority will improve is if business and therefore the country is successful. The Labour part and all other similar socialist movements are all for a flat even society and will try and push that through even against the will of the people. The Labour party becomes more and more Facist the longer they are in power. It is only because Blair pretended to be something other than Labour, that he remained in office. Labour typically get elected, tax and spend and get thrown out.

Fred1new - 13 May 2010 16:33 - 9152 of 81564

Why are the tories so keen on fixed period 5year parliament at this point in time.

Was it in their manifesto?

hilary - 13 May 2010 16:38 - 9153 of 81564

One relatively important piece of economic literature (The Spirit Level) suggests that the rich are better off in an equal society (such as Japan or the Scandinavian countries) than in an unequal society where there is a big divide between the rich and the poor (such as the US and UK).

The idea is that by putting more money in the pockets of the poor, they are the people who are more likely to spend and the money spent will in turn also benefit the rich because it is they who own the factories that make the goods that the poor buy. The theory sounds nice but, when you consider that Japan have been effectively bankrupt for the last 10 years, the theory is not without flaws.

The theory has also been promoted in schools and universities in the UK in recent years and forms a major part of the teachings of the youth of today.

Haystack - 13 May 2010 16:51 - 9154 of 81564

Fred
I doubt that the Conervatives want a fixed term 5 year parliament. It looks like it is the Libs that want it. They would be worried that Cameron might see the economy going well at some stage and want to pull a quick election to increase their majority and ditch the Libs. I guess it was one of the conditions set by Clegg.

Kayak - 13 May 2010 17:09 - 9155 of 81564

Fred, your explanation is not bad as far as it goes, but I think you're missing two important factors. The first is that what is desired and what is actually obtained through the chosen strategy are often two entirely different things. I think what you are confusing is what Gordon wants, which is probably not all that different to what all the other politicians want, i.e. a prosperous society where everyone is happy, and the way he chooses to go about it. Often the obvious way is not the best one. That is why there are many prosperous capitalist societies and few if any prosperous true socialist ones. I'd like a society where everyone's needs are fully met by the State, the only problem is that someone has to pay for it, and if you meet everyone's needs there are not enough working people left to pay for it and no incentive for anyone to work.

Or seen another way, if Gordon's ideas had been so successful, someone would have funded him for a second term.

Secondly, what you see of Gordon's ideas is what he chooses to show you. That is why the Bigotsgate episode was so hugely damaging personally to him - it showed what he really thought of the people he stood for. And OK, everyone is under pressure in their job, but if he thought that the lady's line of questioning was terrible then clearly he had chosen to ignore what the country was saying.

In summary, I think you're confusing what you think he believed in with what he was actually achieving.

Fred1new - 13 May 2010 17:11 - 9156 of 81564

Hilary,

Out of "necessity", the poorer spend a higher percentage of their income and that might account for a higher total of wealth spent. If this is so, then at some points in an economic cycle, it may lead to an increasing GDP, etc..

The problem with the theory, is where are the limits?
===,

Hays,

As, I think you confessed to being an insider, or at least wanting to be. check.

greekman - 13 May 2010 17:13 - 9157 of 81564

This is me,

Fully agree with your post, except I think the euro will not last another 12 months, mainly due to Greece either jumping the Euro ship or being pushed, but also because Spain will quickly follow, with Portugal trailing not far behind.
Once that happens, the remaining countries will leave like rats leaving the sinking ship.
The only way the Euro can survive is if they instigate monetary policy via a euro (federal) bank. This would obviously mean all aspects of finance with monetary budgets, taxed being levelled out. You can't have one currency pegged to more than one country and expect it to work. With differing budgets, policies, one country will want that currency to stay strong, Germany for example, whilst others will want it to weaken, Greece/Spain.
This is what the major Euro powers have always wanted, and will continue to push for, total rule
The euro is dead, and is being kept ticking over on life support, eventually it will have to be accepted, no amount of resuscitation (bail-outs) will revive it.

Note... I presume we all are aware The Bank of England issued a new-style 20 note on 13 March 2007. The note features Adam Smith, (Scottish) one of the fathers of modern economics, on the back and incorporates enhanced security features.

The new-style 20 notes will circulate alongside the old-style Elgar (English) note which will be progressively withdrawn from circulation.

So after the old notes are withdrawn, the only English 20 note will feature a Scotsman.
Can you imagine the uproar if the Scottish 20 featured an Englishman.

Another case of the English losing identity.

Chris Carson - 13 May 2010 17:32 - 9158 of 81564

Probably on a par with Conservative Clubs and the mere sight of an England football shirt :o)

hilary - 13 May 2010 17:47 - 9159 of 81564

Fred,

The cricket's on right now, but you might find this link interesting.

Last among equals

Fwiw, I've got an open mind on the theories.

Fred1new - 13 May 2010 17:58 - 9160 of 81564

Greek.

What English identity.

Your ancestors were a mixed bunch of ruffians.

8-)

Hasn't changed much!

Haystack - 13 May 2010 18:12 - 9161 of 81564

Fred
I don't know why you are against the Conservative. You are a Capitalist aren't you? If you are not, then what are you doing having a paid for subscription to a Finacial Website?
Register now or login to post to this thread.