Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Gausie - 13 Aug 2010 14:57 - 9367 of 81564

Tabs - I hope that's not a resignation speech. Without you here, how will I know what smallcap crap to short? You've made me a packet over the past few years. I'd miss you.

tabasco - 13 Aug 2010 15:04 - 9368 of 81564

Not at all GausieI dont care what your bet isit dont affect meI have been very luckyall I have tried to do is warn other investorsif they dont get it by now they never willtoddle pip

tyketto - 13 Aug 2010 15:09 - 9369 of 81564

It was not the press.
It was a company that was being ramped and deramped
on an other bulletin board.They took legal action and
the BB supplier was forced to reveal the manipulators.
The Co. concerned is now "considering" legal action against them.

Haystack - 13 Aug 2010 15:27 - 9370 of 81564

I think it was ADVFN and iii. The peole involved were working together to cause problems.

tabasco - 13 Aug 2010 15:29 - 9371 of 81564

lol

Haystack - 13 Aug 2010 15:31 - 9372 of 81564

What ever you may think, there are no people working together on BLNK. Certainly none of the ones that you keep referring to.

Gausie - 13 Aug 2010 15:35 - 9373 of 81564

But if you are sufficiently paranoid it makes for a lovely conspiracy theory. With the added benefit that then it's not your fault when you lose money on your investments. You have a conspiracy scapegoat that you can tell your adoring wife all about and she can pat you on your head and say 'there there. You're all safe now. That nasty gausie can't get you here. I've just got to pop out, I promised to do something for a bunch of guys at M&S. Don't wait up. I'll bring you back a lovely big pineapple'

tabasco - 13 Aug 2010 15:40 - 9374 of 81564

Thanks for that Ken...

Gausie - 13 Aug 2010 15:43 - 9375 of 81564

oooooh - you're clever. I see what you're doing! A sophisticated plan, but I'm onto you!

tabasco - 13 Aug 2010 15:45 - 9376 of 81564

HaystackI would have thought you are quite correct blnx have gone from 12p to 64p in less than three monthsthank you very much not a great job by the shorters?

Fred1new - 13 Aug 2010 15:46 - 9377 of 81564

I am in difficulties.

I think I have squelched half the recent posters on this thread.

But, being dyslexic and a superior one, I can guess what the rants, threats and abuse of squelched ones are.

But reading with my third eye I agree with the un-squelched postings.

Strangely in France I didn't understand what was being said to me, and it was obvious what I was saying didn't make much sense to the French.

We got on perfectly well and both sides seemed happy.


Signed

Confused



Sorry "Confuscious" or something like that.



Chris Carson - 13 Aug 2010 16:29 - 9378 of 81564

Fred - Maybe the Nato Phonetic Alphabet, maybe easier for you to understand ie Foxtrot Oscar! :o)

Haystack - 13 Aug 2010 16:41 - 9379 of 81564

tabasco
Who is Ken?

tabasco - 13 Aug 2010 16:44 - 9380 of 81564

Barbies Friend..

greekman - 13 Aug 2010 16:44 - 9381 of 81564

Fred,

Have joined you re the squelching. Will see if other posters still reply to the children who appear to have taken over.
Shame really, as a few who tend to reply to these idiots, often do have something interesting to say.
Still if the squelching makes no difference, this post will at least explain why I am doing a disappearing act.
To the sensible posters (you know who you are) please don't encourage those who appear intent on spoiling this thread by replying/bitting.

Regards to most but not all.

Greek.

tabasco - 13 Aug 2010 16:49 - 9382 of 81564

Sorry GreekI was asked a direct leading questionI gave it my normal answer.

Bullshare - 13 Aug 2010 22:14 - 9383 of 81564

Sometimes the BB' s are richer by characters who are prepared to take a stance on a stock, be they right or wrong. However when it comes to abuse we do try and stamp it out. This week we have banned clubman3509, and now Tabasco's seems to be pressing the self destruct button.

For clarity Gausie is not a member of the MoneyAM management despite delusions by Clubman and Tabasco that he is.

I will put it simply Tabasco, if you persist with your attacks or reposting of other defamatory emails or BB postings you will be removed from MAM.

The BBs are for the enjoyment of everyone. If you want a BB where you can abuse anyone including management I suggest you set up your own BB.

Isaacs - 13 Aug 2010 22:21 - 9384 of 81564

What did clubman get banned for? Abuse seems to be a regular tactic of many. How did he step over the line?

Bullshare - 13 Aug 2010 22:30 - 9385 of 81564

Isaacs. As you can appreciate we get many complaints a day about posters. We are generally very very liberal on this and where we can we edit or just simply accept that sometimes people will rise to bear baiting and over step the mark in the heat of the moment. Having been MD of MoneyAM and ADVFN before that, you know as well as I do that I am extremely tolerant and as a company we hardly ever ban anyone.

However sometimes people overstep the mark with one posting or series of postings and its at that point we decide that after a large number of complaints that enough is enough and with over 200,000 users why should one person take up our time.

If you want to know why he was banned perhaps you should read all his postings since 2006 and see the deterioration in his posting style and more recently the site moderators decided enough was enough on certain postings this week.

Isaacs - 13 Aug 2010 22:47 - 9386 of 81564

Ok thanks I must admit I haven't really followed and was just curious if anything specific had triggered the red card. Think I'll take your word for it! Overall yes I agree you are very tolerant.
Register now or login to post to this thread.