Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Not at all GausieI dont care what your bet isit dont affect meI have been very luckyall I have tried to do is warn other investorsif they dont get it by now they never willtoddle pip

It was not the press.
It was a company that was being ramped and deramped
on an other bulletin board.They took legal action and
the BB supplier was forced to reveal the manipulators.
The Co. concerned is now "considering" legal action against them.

I think it was ADVFN and iii. The peole involved were working together to cause problems.

lol

What ever you may think, there are no people working together on BLNK. Certainly none of the ones that you keep referring to.

But if you are sufficiently paranoid it makes for a lovely conspiracy theory. With the added benefit that then it's not your fault when you lose money on your investments. You have a conspiracy scapegoat that you can tell your adoring wife all about and she can pat you on your head and say 'there there. You're all safe now. That nasty gausie can't get you here. I've just got to pop out, I promised to do something for a bunch of guys at M&S. Don't wait up. I'll bring you back a lovely big pineapple'

Thanks for that Ken...

oooooh - you're clever. I see what you're doing! A sophisticated plan, but I'm onto you!

HaystackI would have thought you are quite correct blnx have gone from 12p to 64p in less than three monthsthank you very much not a great job by the shorters?

I am in difficulties.

I think I have squelched half the recent posters on this thread.

But, being dyslexic and a superior one, I can guess what the rants, threats and abuse of squelched ones are.

But reading with my third eye I agree with the un-squelched postings.

Strangely in France I didn't understand what was being said to me, and it was obvious what I was saying didn't make much sense to the French.

We got on perfectly well and both sides seemed happy.


Signed

Confused



Sorry "Confuscious" or something like that.

Fred - Maybe the Nato Phonetic Alphabet, maybe easier for you to understand ie Foxtrot Oscar! :o)

tabasco
Who is Ken?

Barbies Friend..

Fred,

Have joined you re the squelching. Will see if other posters still reply to the children who appear to have taken over.
Shame really, as a few who tend to reply to these idiots, often do have something interesting to say.
Still if the squelching makes no difference, this post will at least explain why I am doing a disappearing act.
To the sensible posters (you know who you are) please don't encourage those who appear intent on spoiling this thread by replying/bitting.

Regards to most but not all.

Greek.

Sorry GreekI was asked a direct leading questionI gave it my normal answer.

Sometimes the BB' s are richer by characters who are prepared to take a stance on a stock, be they right or wrong. However when it comes to abuse we do try and stamp it out. This week we have banned clubman3509, and now Tabasco's seems to be pressing the self destruct button.

For clarity Gausie is not a member of the MoneyAM management despite delusions by Clubman and Tabasco that he is.

I will put it simply Tabasco, if you persist with your attacks or reposting of other defamatory emails or BB postings you will be removed from MAM.

The BBs are for the enjoyment of everyone. If you want a BB where you can abuse anyone including management I suggest you set up your own BB.

What did clubman get banned for? Abuse seems to be a regular tactic of many. How did he step over the line?

Isaacs. As you can appreciate we get many complaints a day about posters. We are generally very very liberal on this and where we can we edit or just simply accept that sometimes people will rise to bear baiting and over step the mark in the heat of the moment. Having been MD of MoneyAM and ADVFN before that, you know as well as I do that I am extremely tolerant and as a company we hardly ever ban anyone.

However sometimes people overstep the mark with one posting or series of postings and its at that point we decide that after a large number of complaints that enough is enough and with over 200,000 users why should one person take up our time.

If you want to know why he was banned perhaps you should read all his postings since 2006 and see the deterioration in his posting style and more recently the site moderators decided enough was enough on certain postings this week.

Ok thanks I must admit I haven't really followed and was just curious if anything specific had triggered the red card. Think I'll take your word for it! Overall yes I agree you are very tolerant.

Michaelthank you for at least giving myself and my wife opportunity of right to reply without banning meI can honestly say that I have never to my knowledge been abusive to any posters or the management at AMin fact I think you have a very good site here

My problem as you will know is Gausiehe has over a period of time made some pretty disgusting remarks/insults about my wife that have been hard for me to takeabuse at the highest levelI rely on AM to stop this abuseand they have failedGausie posted this just the other day:- AM couldn't and wouldn't say anything to me about you.
Michaelhe went on to say The only way I can stop your wife from rabbiting on about what a tosser you are is by sticking something big into her very receptive mouth.that is just one of many many examples!

Please tell me how he can guarantee himself exemption from any disciplinary action by AM and carry on conducting himself in the same mannerHe boasts AM will take no actionand continues posting in the same manner while others are banned

From an outsiders point of viewwhich my wife isshe cannot understand how he is allowed to get away with this?please explain to her?

Michael you assure me thatFor clarity Gausie is not a member of the MoneyAM management despite delusions by Clubman and Tabasco that he is. I say that he must be using AM name in vain to abuse postersClubman wanted to donate his subscription to a charityGausies reply to Clubman was this:-

Gausie - 13 Aug'10 - 15:17 - 838 of 838

Clubby - I can guarantee you this: whatever subs you may have forfeited at MAM will not be raised by me as the subject of discussion at any of my board meetings. Period.

Now Gausie could come back and say no names were mentionedbut I would say in the context of the conversationthis is pretty damning evidence

Finally I can say I have enjoyed myself on AMI am proud of my track record of successI hope investors have made plenty of money and have laughed a few times at some of my occasionally funny posts...i have tried to keep within the rules

Michael I have got to say if Gausie persists in his normal manner of abuseI will persist in responseI have never given in to a bully in my lifeif you ban me for thisit will be sending out wrong messagesbut at least you have given myself and my wife the opportunity to defend my actions

I am behind on all my Racing Work nowso got to go cheers!..