Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

tabasco
Don't forget what I said about removing disruptive posters!

Haystack...if you want to talk about disruptive posters...Gausie is a legend...anyway you told me personally these bbs was a laugh and not to be taked seriously?...i took your word for that?

It is not my word that counts. I am just reminding you that disruptive posters will be removed.

Tabby - don't you wish you'd paid heed at the time?

Anyway - for balance, here's my response. I suggest that rather than continuing this cut and paste waste of bandwidth, anyone interested in how this story develops should view the original on ADVFN.

Alternatively, we should move this to the MDX thread.

Gausie - 15 Aug'10 - 14:14 - 12106 of 12106

Ta Bazza - You have been working hard. It's good to see your prioritisation skills at work.

The posts seem reasonable and in the light of the SCLN money apparently being wasted on your watch as well as your failure to publish accounts, quite prophetic too. Which is the post you object to?

And please could you provide thread titles so I can check where you've copied this from. I ask this because I see you're up to your old tricks and have already slipped in a little edit of the post referred to as 6934 above. The two copies you've posted above differ in a small but significant and meaningful way.

Surely you wouldn't try to mislead us in the way it is claimed you tried to mislead the judge with your sham property security?

G

Haystack...i am not being disruptive...Gausie ask me to post it...just doing t
he decent thing....look...nice language

Gausie - 13 Aug'10 - 14:22 - 11927 of 11929

Remind me what the statement was? It's obviously a big deal to you. Post it here and I'll defend it and back it up with evidence. Otherwise, f*ck off.

bit of a disruptive post that Gausie?

Batty - which poster was that request directed towards? Are you now claiming to be Barry Muncaster?

No!he is even more determined than me!

Gausielooks like you been tucked up?lol.the wife sends her love again...

Haystack...i am not being disruptive...Gausie ask me to post it...

Where did I ask you to post it? What request did I make of which poster? and where?

You're lying again tabby.

Sigh! (just talking to myself btw)

I don't think that you are allowed to talk to yourself any more skinny. Let me just check the rule book. ;o)

Clubby.go to the MDX 2010 thread and read on from post 12104...you might find it interesting.Gausie has acquired some more friendslol

You're lying again tabby..Gausie thats coming from the guy that stated on these bbs Tabasco got you banned Clubbyyou are going to eat those words sunshineits all good fun haystack/ziplessthats what these boards are forat least thats what you told meIm just joining in. nite nite

looks like t is now laying the foundations for a new future "punchline" to HIDE behind. its about time, i'm fed up with his old one.just talking to myself..
regards
jkd

JKD... "It could still be a good night if you play your cards right!...so "good game good game"...and "Didn't you do well?"...now "Give us a twirl"....not forgettig Gausie's ........................"What a grey day"

Will Squelch Gausie and Tabasco to see if that improves anything.
It is a shame that tabasco has been drawn into this childish argument.
From his many previous post (weeks ago) I though he would be above such pathetic nonsense.
I would have answered Gausie once (not going down to his level). I would also have reported him, then squelched him after giving him a chance to apologize, and left it at that.
After squelching, I will see if that works before leaving this thread for a few weeks at least.

Note... Gausie should have been banned ages ago due to his personal insults that often went way over what MoneyAm states are it's conditions of posting content.
It is OK being liberal, but I am disappointed that they have allowing so many Gausie posts to stand.
I thought their standards were higher than those of several competitors.

I must apologise again Greek I will take your criticism on the chinand except for the time beingthis thread is damagedAM is a good site and Michael seems to be a fair personin answer to you post Gausie will never get bannedhe has posted up AM would not and could not say anything blah blahhe is not a Director but talks as if he is in chargehe threatened Clubby telling himClubby you have gone to far we have your home address and can send someone to see you at any time so watch your back.
G.
We have your home addresswho are we?and why would Gausie put AM at risk?
How can you let that carry onI would like to know from an ex. Policemans point of view?

Greekman

You have summed it up spot on ... there seems to be double standards here at MoneyAm for reasons best known to them.

Tabby - your claims are pure fantasy.