Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

I was thinking of a foot version....too technical for me...feet..arms,..so what.......or a bag of hand grenades...you never know, foxy might be as clever as Basil Brush.....

.

Anyone remember one of the Crocodile Dundee films, the one where some drunks were shooting kangaroos. Dundee then held one dead roo in front of him, whilst firing a rifle at the drunks.
Priceless.

The argument of fox hunting keeps the number of foxes down is fallacious.

I have no objection to culling them, but at least make it humane as possible.

I can't see much in fox hunting or even horse racing, as it is the horse which is doing all the work and generally gets cut up afterwards for dog meat,

But, I suppose if some "oiks" want to dress up in red tights and disturb the peace by blowing tin bugles, so be it.

I don't think they need to wear protective gearing though.

When there was no fox hunting due to foot & mouth the country side was not over ran with fox's. Also we were told if there was a ban on hunting with hounds 100's of people would loose job's and 1,000's of hounds would be put down.

Keep the ban on hunting and close any loop holes in the law of the present one.

No jobs were lost, because fox hunting still continues. They still run hunts and follow a lure. The Act is difficult to police as the hounds may pick up the scent of a real fox mid-hunt and then chase that. The number involved in hunting has increased since the ban.

You are pemermitted to use one dog to flush out a fox to be killed by a bird of prey, which is probably a more lingering death than to be killed by dogs.

Still, I am sure it will be repealed. There were many Labour MPs that were against the legislation, but they were not allowed a free vote. The fact that the government used the Parliament Act to force through the law shows that it was unpopular and likely to be repealed.

Fred ,you do talk a load of rubbish ! boxing being leagalised thuggery ,,,i have been involved in boxing all my life in one way or another and generally you couldn't meet a nicer bunch of people .

"Future bully boys and army fodder" what a load of crap !!!

JB,

Are you a good advert for the "sport" based of mutilation and knocking another person senseless?

On second thoughts, you maybe.

What mutilation Fred ? What Mike Tyson done was a accident he was only wispering in his ear and Evander pulled his head away.

Hatstack,

You say, 'You are permitted to use one dog to flush out a fox to be killed by a bird of prey, which is probably a more lingering death than to be killed by dogs'.
Sorry but in this country, I have never seen a bird of prey used to kill a fox, flushed out, but not saying it does not happen. I agree they are allowed to flush out with 1 dog, but that dog either mauls the fox to death due to it being cornered in its den, or it is flushed out and killed by other dogs or netted and killed.
As to loss of jobs. If hunting was truly banned, no doubt many hunt members would still ride, so their horses would still need keeping, grooming, fodder etc, so there would be only a few jobs that would go.
As to the usual death, the nearest part of the fox (the hind quarters in the 2 foxes I have seen killed) are grabbed by the nearest dog and once the second or third dogs get a hold, it is usually torn screaming limb from limb.
I have spoken to many who follow hunts, both pro and anti, who have seen kills, and very rarely is a fox killed by a throat area death grip or bite.
As to hounds coming across a fox scent whilst following a lure, you ask any hunt member and they will tell you the 'Whipper in' has little problem in controlling the hounds. So why can't they just call them in from the scent.
As to my earlier post re Dogs put down. These was an official statement and figures quoted to the inquiry prior to the recent ban.
After 5 or 6 seasons, when they (the hounds) will be 7 to 8 years old, most hounds physically cannot run up with the rest of the pack. Hounds that cannot keep up will adversely affect the efficiency of the pack and are liable to become a risk hazard. Hounds dislike being left behind, (what they actually mean it saves money putting them down). There is no other option other than to humanely put them down when they can no longer perform their role. END

In an Average year, 3000 hounds that are fit and well, but are deemed to old to keep up are put down, a fact that is very rarely if ever mentioned.
I wonder just how many hunt supporters, would be prepared to witness the death of these hounds.

Well posted Greekman , also a lot of country people only march with the countryside allience because they are afraid of upsetting the hunting set who employ them.

Good post Greek...

Aldwickk,

Agree. To be even handed when it comes to sides, I have seen many incidents where hunt supporters and the anti hunt brigade have been violent mainly to each other but sometimes to the animals. The anti brigade also attracts the idiots who will follow any cause just to be anti.
OH well it's yet another week gone on the treadmill of life.
So have a good weekend all, (Fred, as the bells gone for the end of the round, I do include you in that).

Aldwickk, I received your e-mail. hope you got mine.

Greek.

Greekman

Yes i got your email thanks , will reply .

greekman
The dog flushing out the fox to be killed by a bird of prey or shot is part of the new regulations. Many hunts operate that way now quite legally. At some time in the future I expect it to return the previous methods.

To be killed by a bird of prey was a loop hole in the law and not ment to be part of
the new regulations.

They can be shot as well. I did find out that the limit is two dogs to flush out the fox.

Just squelsh Fred. He is a complete fool.

Indeed Tim, the man is a total oxygen thief. I imagine if everyone squished or totally ignored him he would get bored and piss off.

The whole hunt ban thing was part of labour's imaginary class war on the 'toffs'. The reality was always different.. Hunting was/is much more classless (as is shooting, my sport) than the towny labourites knew. I doubt that animal welfare had much of a part to play. Most towny labourites know three parts of bugger all about animal welfare or countryside management. The British countryside is the way it is through centuries of management by man, which includes culling pest and predator species.

My own daughter took up shooting after seeing the destruction wrought by foxes on a sheep farm when she worked lambing. The farmer had to shoot literally hundreds of foxes a year.

A vast amount of nonsense seems to be spouted and pontificated by those with no experience of the real world when it comes to wildlife.

Our own garden is now bursting with song birds. Chaffinches, tits, robins, sparrows, yellowhammers, goldfinches, the place is alive. Why? Well we feed them - and I shoot the damned magpies that kill them and sometimes bother to eat them.