goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
hilary
- 21 Oct 2010 15:52
- 9707 of 81564
You should know better than to argue with an idiot. They invariably drag you down to their own level and end up beating you with their years of experience.
rawdm999
- 21 Oct 2010 15:56
- 9708 of 81564
Discussion evolving again & haven't got time.
Fred1new
- 21 Oct 2010 16:01
- 9709 of 81564
Greek.
No. It is wiser not to make assumptions, unless it is explicit in what I write
(You have an a perfect right to assumptions, but false assumptions can lead you up a dark alley.)
Also, I feel it is a little like being accusing somebody of villainy, or similar action, and confirming it by on the assumption that, because the individual does not to answer, or plead according to whim, he/she is found guilty and should be "banged up".
I hope that is not the principal that you are operating on.
rawdm999
- 21 Oct 2010 16:18
- 9710 of 81564
Greek, we are wasting time. I'm taking Hilary's comment on board and writing it out a hundred times.
jkd
- 21 Oct 2010 16:37
- 9711 of 81564
try the squelch button. never used it myself.
but then havnt felt the need to write out a hundred lines either.
seems desperate. LoL!
may or may not help
just a suggestion and as always just my opinion and please be sure to dyor
regards
jkd
Fred1new
- 21 Oct 2010 16:39
- 9712 of 81564
Raw.
What ever turns you on!
Fred1new
- 21 Oct 2010 16:52
- 9713 of 81564
Does Andrew Mitchell manage his "government office" from the Cayman Islands?
greekman
- 21 Oct 2010 19:03
- 9714 of 81564
Says it all really.
A woman who has 13 children has just been complaining about the cuts on our local news channel.
I suppose she expects us to keep her large brood.
Cost to the tax payer.
First child 20.30 per week. 81.20 per month. 1055.60 per year.
Other children 13.40 per week. 52.60 per month. 683.80 x 12 = 8205.60 per year.
Total for this 1 family 9261.20 per year, in child benefit alone.
Then of course they may be on other benefits.
Examples like this are one of the reasons we are in this mess.
If she had not received child benefit, I bet she would have found another hobby.
I think any family that has more than 2 children should not receive child benefit.
Why should we keep these large families.
Makes my blood boil.
ptholden
- 21 Oct 2010 21:12
- 9715 of 81564
rawdm999
The point to remember re the news aircraft carriers is that both would never have been in service simultaneously. Whilst one is operational, the other will be in refit, undergoing modifications and updates followed by a lengthy regeneration process - trials and training.
Whether the RN (or RFA) will ever have jets to operate from the carriers, only time will tell. Incidentally, the Coalition was absolutely right in that cancelling the contracts would have cost a significant amount of tax payers money.
Fred1new
- 21 Oct 2010 21:49
- 9717 of 81564
I would castrate the children at birth.
That would teach them to be better citizens.
Fred1new
- 21 Oct 2010 21:54
- 9719 of 81564
See Tweedledee and Tweedledum are asking Nick help to explain the economy to them.
Seems more like a comedy act on the music hall circus than a government.
Mind the act is a little black humoured.
Fred1new
- 22 Oct 2010 10:49
- 9720 of 81564
Can't the Navy afford Charts nowadays.
Nuclear submarine 'grounded on rocks' off Skye
===============================
Royal Navy submarine HMS Astute has got into difficulty off Skye, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) has confirmed.
An eye-witness told BBC Scotland that the boat appeared to be grounded on rocks a few miles from the Skye road bridge.
A Ministry of Defence spokeswoman said: "This is a not a nuclear incident.
"We are responding to the incident and can confirm that there are no injuries to personnel and the submarine remains watertight."
The spokeswoman added: "There is no indication of any environmental impact".
The Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) said it was alerted to the incident at about 0819 BST.
A spokesman said they were monitoring the situation.
greekman
- 22 Oct 2010 11:15
- 9721 of 81564
Another, you could not make it up.
A cafowner in Stockport Manchester has been ordered to remove an extractor fan because the smell of fried bacon is offending passing Muslims. Several Muslims have made complaints to Stockport Council.
I wonder if the same action would have been ordered if a smell coming from a Muslim caf had resulted in a similar complaint from none Muslims.
All actions such as this both store up and increase anger and racial tensions.
Integration, who are they kidding.
Fred1new
- 22 Oct 2010 11:55
- 9722 of 81564
Greek,
I personally wouldn't like to live next door to a "curry" house or a "chippy". Especially if they were working 24hours a day.
I think I would be happy that they installed an extractor of some beneficial form.
=========
You like numbers and "logic".
If you haven't heard this programme, try a quick listen.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00vcqcx/In_Our_Time_Logic
Fred1new
- 22 Oct 2010 11:59
- 9723 of 81564
rawdm999
- 22 Oct 2010 14:02
- 9724 of 81564
pth. the principle of two warships is always a very good idea considering the lead in times involved. A backup is always useful. However, when these were on the drawing board someone should have seen the defence budget black hole forming and cut the cloth accordingly. Maybe the carriers were an ego stroking exercise for someone or may be it was thought that some more creative accounting would pay for them.
Two smaller vessels carrying fewer jets would have been better than two floating helicopter platforms.
I agree, cancelling the contract would have been totally wrong with the costs involved and at least it keeps the shipyards et al busy.
greekman
- 22 Oct 2010 15:34
- 9725 of 81564
Rawdm999,
Another problem I see, is how will the build quality stand up. It must be very difficult to take pride in building a ship over several years that is destined to end up in a foreign navy, or even scrapped.
I accept there were very options open to the government, but by the time the ships are built, who knows what the financial/political situation will be.
ptholden
- 22 Oct 2010 15:52
- 9726 of 81564
R999
I don't think anyone saw the 'black hole' approaching, otherwise the country wouldn't be in the mess we are now. The carriers and all other defence projects were predicated upon the strategic vision at the time (we're talking some years ago). The RN service chiefs believed (and still do) that the CVS project is critical to the future shape of the Navy. Procurement is certainly a complicated business and Grand Strategic planning is always going to be flawed by the lack of a crystal ball.
Also, I don't think build quality will be any more of a problem now than it ever has been Greek, I doubt the Yards that are constructing each bit of the ships are too worried where they might end up and your final comment is entirely correct.