This thread has been destroyed by the abuse of sequestor and dil

If you have any sense you will use the squelch facility, and get rid of both these morons, until MAM finally get their finger out and ban them





























This thread has been destroyed by the abuse of sequestor and dil

If you have any sense you will use the squelch facility, and get rid of both these morons, until MAM finally get their finger out and ban them






























This thread has been destroyed by the abuse of sequestor and dil

If you have any sense you will use the squelch facility, and get rid of both these morons, until MAM finally get their finger out and ban them


















This thread has been destroyed by the abuse of sequestor and dil

If you have any sense you will use the squelch facility, and get rid of both these morons, until MAM finally get their finger out and ban them

.

AVOID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sequestor is duly reported to the abuse team ....

Anyone who goes around stalking other MonyAM members, and posting personal attacks on them, and attacks on their stocks, on every BB they post on, is obviously deranged.

PM

You certainly seem to have upset a few people Paul! i try to read through a lot of threads and it certainly got very personal with Yoomedia where i thought there were a lot of good points raised from both sides of the fence.
Time will tell with this suggestion but you certainly have given us a lot of information to ponder on which is more than i can say for sequestor.
DB66

Doughboy Hi,

Thanks, I hope the abuse team can direct seq away from this continual abuse of me, and my stocks, or ban him/her/it.

Cheers,
PM

From the weekend press, these were kindly e-mailed to me ....

Little write up (including a buy recommendation )in the'Broker's
Notes'section of the Sunday Express today.


Also a mention in 'Share tips' teletext, channel 4, page 502.


Cheers,
PM

Hi All,

Well it just shows how much seq knows .... MPM are storming up :)

Cheers,
PM

Big earner ?

Bush To Impose Psychiatric Drug Regime

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/328/7454/1458

Jeanne Lenzer

New York


A sweeping mental health initiative will be unveiled by President George W Bush in July. The plan promises to integrate mentally ill patients fully into the community by providing "services in the community, rather than institutions," according to a March 2004 progress report entitled New Freedom Initiative (www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/newfreedom/toc-2004.html). While some praise the plan's goals, others say it protects the profits of drug companies at the expense of the public.

Bush established the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health in April 2002 to conduct a "comprehensive study of the United States mental health service delivery system." The commission issued its recommendations in July 2003. Bush instructed more than 25 federal agencies to develop an implementation plan based on those recommendations.

The president's commission found that "despite their prevalence, mental disorders often go undiagnosed" and recommended comprehensive mental health screening for "consumers of all ages," including preschool children. According to the commission, "Each year, young children are expelled from preschools and childcare facilities for severely disruptive behaviours and emotional disorders." Schools, wrote the commission, are in a "key position" to screen the 52 million students and 6 million adults who work at the schools.

The commission also recommended "Linkage [of screening] with treatment and supports" including "state-of-the-art treatments" using "specific medications for specific conditions." The commission commended the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) as a "model" medication treatment plan that "illustrates an evidence-based practice that results in better consumer outcomes."

Dr Darrel Regier, director of research at the American Psychiatric Association (APA), lauded the president's initiative and the Texas project model saying, "What's nice about TMAP is that this is a logical plan based on efficacy data from clinical trials."

He said the association has called for increased funding for implementation of the overall plan.

But the Texas project, which promotes the use of newer, more expensive antidepressants and antipsychotic drugs, sparked off controversy when Allen Jones, an employee of the Pennsylvania Office of the Inspector General, revealed that key officials with influence over the medication plan in his state received money and perks from drug companies with a stake in the medication algorithm (15 May, p1153). He was sacked this week for speaking to the BMJ and the New York Times.

The Texas project started in 1995 as an alliance of individuals from the pharmaceutical industry, the University of Texas, and the mental health and corrections systems of Texas. The project was funded by a Robert Wood Johnson grantand by several drug companies.

Mr Jones told the BMJ that the same "political/pharmaceutical alliance" that generated the Texas project was behind the recommendations of the New Freedom Commission, which, according to his whistleblower report, were "poised to consolidate the TMAP effort into a comprehensive national policy to treat mental illness with expensive, patented medications of questionable benefit and deadly side effects, and to force private insurers to pick up more of the tab" (http://psychrights.org/Drugs/AllenJonesTMAPJanuary20.pdf).

Larry D Sasich, research associate with Public Citizen in Washington, DC, told the BMJ that studies in both the United States and Great Britain suggest that "using the older drugs first makes sense. There's nothing in the labeling of the newer atypical antipsychotic drugs that suggests they are superior in efficacy to haloperidol [an older "typical" antipsychotic]. There has to be an enormous amount of unnecessary expenditures for the newer drugs."

Olanzapine (trade name Zyprexa), one of the atypical antipsychotic drugs recommended as a first line drug in the Texas algorithm, grossed $4.28bn (2.35bn; 3.56bn) worldwide in 2003 and is Eli Lilly's top selling drug. A 2003 New York Times article by Gardiner Harris reported that 70% of olanzapine sales are paid for by government agencies, such as Medicare and Medicaid.

Eli Lilly, manufacturer of olanzapine, has multiple ties to the Bush administration. George Bush Sr was a member of Lilly's board of directors and Bush Jr appointed Lilly's chief executive officer, Sidney Taurel, to a seat on the Homeland Security Council. Lilly made $1.6m in political contributions in 200082% of which went to Bush and the Republican Party.

Jones points out that the companies that helped to start up the Texas project have been, and still are, big contributors to the election funds of George W Bush. In addition, some members of the New Freedom Commission have served on advisory boards for these same companies, while others have direct ties to the Texas Medication Algorithm Project.

Bush was the governor of Texas during the development of the Texas project, and, during his 2000 presidential campaign, he boasted of his support for the project and the fact that the legislation he passed expanded Medicaid coverage of psychotropic drugs.

Bush is the clear front runner when it comes to drug company contributions. According to the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP), manufacturers of drugs and health products have contributed $764 274 to the 2004 Bush campaign through their political action committees and employeesfar outstripping the $149 400 given to his chief rival, John Kerry, by 26 April.

Drug companies have fared exceedingly well under the Bush administration, according to the centre's spokesperson, Steven Weiss.

The commission's recommendation for increased screening has also been questioned. Robert Whitaker, journalist and author of Mad in America, says that while increased screening "may seem defensible," it could also be seen as "fishing for customers," and that exorbitant spending on new drugs "robs from other forms of care such as job training and shelter programmes."

But Dr Graham Emslie, who helped develop the Texas project, defends screening: "There are good data showing that if you identify kids at an earlier age who are aggressive, you can intervene... and change their trajectory."

Cheers,

PM

Ask him why he was banned from ADVFN.

LOL. Seq, I take it you have piled in?

No, but the usual suspect is pushing rubbish again, and is terrified of being exposed- the truth is if you bought this a.m., presumably that is why he ramps 24/7, not because he is a good samaritan-at an average of say 1.5p you would have seen a , well give it best 1.49 bid= a loss, and more from commision and stamp- hardly "storming up", if you are holding why post loads of spam unless you are trying to ramp up the price?

So I merely post the truth, to counter his ramping, stalking?- hah, he knows why he is running scared-ask AFN.

Sequestor reported again to abuse ....

Another great ramp from The Master,anyone who bgt. today @ the av. price could sell later at 1.49, (now 1.46), a massive 1.5% rise,
less costs - a loss.

Compare the truth to this bollox---

paulmasterson1 - 18 Jul 2005 08:23 - 8 of 14
Hi All,
Well it just shows how much seq knows .... MPM are storming up :)
Cheers,
PM
-----------

ps masterson you don`t need to report me to anyone -MAM are watching you by the minute

ROTFLMFAO@ The Master-ramper

i vote you guys stick to this thread and rename it the Seq and PM show...

edited by Moneyam

You can buy for 1.46p and sell for 1.41p so don't be fooled by the mid price, or the bullshit that sequestor spouts ....

From IWeb 2 seconds ago ....

Buy Order Confirmation
Stock (MPM.L) MINSTER PHARM ORD 0.1P
Quantity 200000
Price 0.0146 GBP
Gross Consideration 2920.00 GBP
Commission 10.00 GBP
Stamp Duty 14.60 GBP
PTM Levy 0.00 GBP
Total Consideration 2944.60 GBP
This quote is valid for 2 seconds

Please note that the quote price displayed
may be improved upon execution

ROTFFLMFAO-genius

paulmasterson1 - 19 Jul 2005 08:16 - 18 of 18
You can buy for 1.46p and sell for 1.41p so don't be fooled by the mid price, or the bullshit that sequestor spouts ....
00000

thus losing 3.05 %- thats what I call a bargain- add costs-- loss -5%
......
paulmasterson1 - 18 Jul 2005 21:58 - 17 of 19
Sequestor you low life piece of shit, fuckoff ruining my board, you pathetic deranged degenerate tosser !
Oh dear reported to abuse- now you see why AFN banned him- disgusting.

Paul, you are just rising to the bait. Seq does have a fair point (the spread is crap) but you need to just cool it or he will continue to have a go.

You may have a point in this stock but i have to say this stock is such a micro cap that you could easily be burned. the dcf valustion may be 6p but with Biotec there is a reason for the steep discounts before the end of clinical trials...i should know because that is my trading area (mainly US stocks).

Please keep to the topic. We do not tolerate personal abuse. A posting containing personal abuse has been edited by us.



Mike
MoneyAM