With video search set to be the next big growth area BLNX have the software the likes of Microsoft, Google and NewsCorp would love to have.

In fact BLNX have done deals with most of these, the most recent being the UtargetFox deal which has been reported in the USA but not RNS'd in the UK.

Alexa rankings confirm the continued growth in usage as its viral effect spreads:-

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/blinkx.com

The ITN RNS confirms blnx is the best in the market and is growing fast:-

Leading News Organization ITN Extends Advertising Deal with blinkx Based on Proven Campaign Success




blinkx Selected to Power Advertising across ITN Website and Syndication Partner Sites




SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF. - July 2, 2008 - blinkx, the world's largest and most advanced video search engine, today announced that it has won an extension contract that will augment the scope of its advertising partnership with ITN, one of the world's leading news and multimedia content companies. Under the terms of the new agreement, ITN will use AdHoc, blinkx's patented contextual advertising platform for online TV and video, to serve advertisements on the ITN website and its syndication partner sites, including Bebo.




Through AdHoc, ITN has already been effectively monetizing its premium news content on the blinkx.com network for over six months. During this time, ITN achieved a significantly better return, greater search volume, and higher monetization through blinkx than through other syndication partners.




AdHoc uses blinkx's patented speech-to-text transcription and visual analysis technology to understand video content more thoroughly and effectively than any other service today, and can therefore dynamically place the most pertinent advertising against it. The AdHoc platform offers media companies and advertisers a unique value proposition -- video advertising which combines the emotive power of TV promotion, with the relevance and utility of contextual search advertising.




The confluence of ITN's premium TV content, blinkx's extensive syndication network, and AdHoc's uniquely powerful targeting capabilities was a formula for success. By extending its partnership with blinkx, ITN aims to achieve similar returns by leveraging the AdHoc platform to deliver contextually relevant video advertising on its own website and across its distribution partner sites.




'We're thrilled to be broadening our relationship with ITN,' said Suranga Chandratillake, founder and CEO of blinkx. 'News content is one of the most popular categories of online video and there's clearly a tremendous opportunity for monetization. The success of our partnership with ITN is evidence that the blinkx AdHoc platform is a uniquely powerful solution for online video advertising today.'




'We've been delighted with the results of our partnership with blinkx and are looking forward to implementing the AdHoc technology on our site,' said Nicholas Wheeler, managing director, ITN On. 'blinkx AdHoc has proven that it can achieve significant monetization of our content, effective marketing for advertisers and, most importantly, a useful, non-disruptive experience for our audience.'




As a pioneer in video search technology, blinkx has built a reputation as the most effective way to search new forms of online content such as video. With more than 350 partners and 26 million hours of indexed video and audio content, including favorite TV moments, news clips, short documentaries, music videos, video blogs and more, blinkx uses advanced speech recognition technology to deliver results that are more accurate and reliable than standard metadata-based keyword searches.

Sorry Clubby had to go in cognitothose awfully nice people Kenny and Mickey were on to me.spun them a yarn dont you knowthink I got away with itnever know with these damn foreigners had to rush orf and feed the polo poniesmust dash wife poured me a pimm and pimmsno umbrellaIm frightfully annoyedanyway Man I gotta slang this brick before i get ducked in on by 5-0 .golly went into character for a momenttickety boo nowtoddle pip

Tabby

What have you done ? you have resurrected the great Satan.

We all know that you are Benny Hill

I would like to know who is supplying "you lot"?

Fred Scuttle had some input...

Sometimes the BB' s are richer by characters who are prepared to take a stance on a stock, be they right or wrong. However when it comes to abuse we do try and stamp it out. This week we have banned clubman3509, and now it seems Tabasco's seems to be pressing the self destruct button.

For clarity Gausie is not a member of the MoneyAM management despite delusions by Clubman and Tabasco that he is.

I will put it simply Tabasco, if you persist with your attacks or reposting of other defamatory emails or BB postings you will be removed from MAM.

The BBs are for the enjoyment of everyone. If you want a BB where you can abuse anyone including management I suggest you set up your own BB.

Bullshare

You're fired.

G :-)

Michaelthank you for at least giving myself and my wife opportunity of right to reply without banning meI can honestly say that I have never to my knowledge been abusive to any posters or the management at AMin fact I think you have a very good site here

My problem as you will know is Gausiehe has over a period of time made some pretty disgusting remarks/insults about my wife that have been hard for me to takeabuse at the highest levelI rely on AM to stop this abuseand they have failedGausie posted this just the other day:- AM couldn't and wouldn't say anything to me about you.
Michaelhe went on to say The only way I can stop your wife from rabbiting on about what a tosser you are is by sticking something big into her very receptive mouth.that is just one of many many examples!

Please tell me how he can guarantee himself exemption from any disciplinary action by AM and carry on conducting himself in the same mannerHe boasts AM will take no actionand continues posting in the same manner while others are banned

From an outsiders point of viewwhich my wife isshe cannot understand how he is allowed to get away with this?please explain to her?

Michael you assure me thatFor clarity Gausie is not a member of the MoneyAM management despite delusions by Clubman and Tabasco that he is. I say that he must be using AM name in vain to abuse postersClubman wanted to donate his subscription to a charityGausies reply to Clubman was this:-

Gausie - 13 Aug'10 - 15:17 - 838 of 838

Clubby - I can guarantee you this: whatever subs you may have forfeited at MAM will not be raised by me as the subject of discussion at any of my board meetings. Period.

Now Gausie could come back and say no names were mentionedbut I would say in the context of the conversationthis is pretty damning evidence

Finally I can say I have enjoyed myself on AMI am proud of my track record of successI hope investors have made plenty of money and have laughed a few times at some of my occasionally funny posts...i have tried to keep within the rules

Michael I have got to say if Gausie persists in his normal manner of abuseI will persist in responseI have never given in to a bully in my lifeif you ban me for thisit will be sending out wrong messagesbut at least you have given myself and my wife the opportunity to defend my actions

I am behind on all my Racing Work nowso got to go cheers!..

Any tips Tabby?

tabasco; You give as much as you take on these BBs. I can certainly pull out individual quotes from you which are just as damning. I know there are people on here simply trying to wind you up, you know it,we know it. For that very reson we are very liberal with our attitude, indeed many of the ususal suspects have had warnings and in some cases phone calls asking them to moderate their style. In my time on BB's since 1996 I have met face to face many 100's of users and in that time only one particular poster have i found obnoxious, very sadly he died recently.

I am sure if you met your detractors in a pub you would actually like them and find out what their agenda is, it is simply to warn off newbies from being suckered into crap stocks or stocks that are being ramped.

As for Gausie being a board member maybe you should reread what you posted. He says that at the board meeting of his company he wont be talking about MAM, and why should he, his company has nothing to do with us. I can assure you nor will we be talking about Gausies company at our board meetings.

Michaelhis claims AM couldn't and wouldn't say anything to me about you. and He boasts AM will take no action.from an outsiders point of viewthis looks a little BiasedI have to say I will continue to defend myself and my wifeand except Gausie will be free to do as he pleasesthank you for your reply

Bullshare - a good sensible post or two ..... of course, one might also find that a member whom you thought you liked turned out to be totally appalling in real life! .... i must also say, i do feel very badly neglected, as i haven't had a yellow card; perhaps management is afraid of the anti-discrimination legislation!

tabasco: Gausie is right we couldnt and wouldnt talk to him about you, why should we, he is a user like you not management, just as we couldnt and wouldnt talk to you about him, we have legal obligations to protect our users privacy and information. I have no idea of the context about MAM not taking action, Gausie, Dil etc have all had emails, phone calls from us and me at various times over the last 9 years. Sometimes its harder asking them to tone things down when you have met them face to face and enjoyed a beer.

Cynic :-)

Bullshare - why are you such a saddo that you are found on here this morning? .... my excuse is that I am catching up on o'night biz e-mails as well as the golf in USA

Bullshare

Two points

1. Tappy said: I can honestly say that I have never to my knowledge been abusive to any posters or the management at AM Well he is always saying he is a thicko. maybe he should add with a bad memory.


2. The list of directors of AM are in the public domain.

Tabby

Your post illustrates the depth of your paranoia.

Your wife - you introduced complete fabrications insulting me and my family over two years ago and reposted variants of them time and time again. I started to post about your wife maybe three months ago. If you can't take it, don't dish it.

"AM couldn't and wouldn't say anything to me about you" - I stand by this statement. You could substitute AM in that sentence with the name of any properly run company and it is equally as true.

"He boasts AM will take no action" - You've made this up. I have never made any such claim. Indeed - I have on occasion received a deserved slapped wrist from MAM. I know I post very close to the line, but if ever I am warned that I may have stepped over it then I immediately take a few paces back.

"Clubby - I can guarantee you this: whatever subs you may have forfeited at MAM will not be raised by me as the subject of discussion at any of my board meetings. Period." You need to re-read this post and the preceding postings in the light of what you now know. Add to that the fact that I run a number of companies and attend board meetings of a number of other companies (one of which turns over more than 250m and employs in excess of 4,000 staff in Kent) and you'll see my answers make perfect sense.

Perhaps one day you'll pause for a moment and wonder how and why you have managed to get yourself into this position. You complain that an entire gang seems to be against you. There is no gang - just a number of decent individual traders and investors each of whom has independently grown to dislike your manner of posting.

How and why, do you suppose, have you become worthy of such apparently unwelcome attention?

What do you suppose you can do to prevent it in the future?

Please don't post the answers to these questions because I'm not interested, and nor, I expect, is anyone else on this BB. They are posed as rhetorical subject matter for your private contemplation and introspection.

Say "Hi" to your wife for me.

G

Cynic; Staff and moderators on holiday so sadly I have to do some work for a change:-0)

'I can honestly say that I have never to my knowledge been abusive to any posters'

I did say I wouldn't post on this thread again, but this is an absolutely priceless quote that I couldn't ignore. As Mike states there are many, many examples of such, I feel particularly sympathetic towards JKD who to the best of MY knowledge has never insulted anyone on this board but for some reason has attracted Tabasco's condescending, arrogant insults. Hey ho back to BLNX.

Looks like the shorters may be correct and a DT was formed, although yet to be convinced. Perhaps I need to take my head out of the sand? I did think there was a little more upside but 55p will answer the question.

GausieI have asked you to post up any insults I have directed at your family on many occasionsno show thus farinteresting post!
Peterplease post up any of my comments to JKD that you find abusive

There are others:

tabasco - 10 Aug 2010 17:23 - 2049 of 2219
Gausienot a bad dayChesshave I ever had a pop at youJKD is a shit stirring irritantas you probably knowCynicbinned your profitwell donebut a brave man that could be kicking himself shortlyanyway I am ever so slightly pissedtalk later