TheFrenchConnection
- 11 Nov 2010 00:36
- 2583 of 3289
perhaps .Who knows? One day perhaps with better technology, and a better understanding of the highly friable sands of Northern Colombia.: But no matter what work GEO do lggy will never be the well it could, and should, have been .DST indicating over 400 feet of heavily saturated sands of the most perfect API grade ...ssshheeesh .... was a potential bonanza. ......instead we end up spending months juste trying to re-enter after the mudweight episode ...That "absolute farce of a cock up is a bloody mystery all of its own!! ,,,,,Anyway then is then ; and NOW IS NOW .Forget lggy for now. ..Looks like Plat 3 which is being accorded a high COS by analyists who a matter of weeks ago had NEVER even heard of AMER is to be spudded soon yet we dont even know if we have sourced a bigger rig yet as the ones used at Fenix were only for very shallow wells.....This company needs to communicate and now coverage has been iniatiated by some of the big players out there it will be FORCED to seen to improve communications Whetether it does is another matter . ...........,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...On a more serious note . l do apologise YUFF-. l wasnt ignoring your posting reg. Pritchards . Whoever posted suggesting Pritchards dont have principal positions is talking nonsense . l happen to know for a fact that they aquired the said principal interest in AMER when they aquired the now defunct somewhat disgraced house of "Wills and CO", Even senior staff at Pritchards such as lan Murrell, Jonathon Craier and my man are ex Wills men ...l trust that claifies matters. A Principal position . ? Quite ironically it has grown to mean a number of things . You have really opened a can of worms here..;_} But i mean it in its most literal form in so far that when one party holds stock on behalf of a third party; be it a big retail broker,struck at an agreed discounted rate with the remit to sell directly to clients without the need to go via a dealer on the floor) MM)...; or holding stock on behalf of a third party to sell via the trading floor, or holding on behalf of a another party to utilize and expoit as happens when stock is held in nominee for shorting purposes ( tradeing the shell yet still holding the core of the stock; or simply holding on behalf of a another party as an investment such as a hi value client ; or as more likely their own corporate investment. ....ln saying that i have heard many brokers use the term to mean any sizeable interest held by a house which -while considerable -does not crossthe legally disclosable 3% threshold....... l am not explaining this very well so shall quit while still sane .....