Empyrean Energy

Web site : http://www.empyreanenergy.com

can't be bothered any more with your inane rantings .... have never used "squelch button" before but have decided to now

Too much bulls**t there cynic. Numbers, messages, uber-rich claims, threats (and they were, make no mistake), etc, etc.

I'd actually forgotten about "Squelch". I'm pretty sure I've never had to use it. It's a bit like an Asbo for the BB's - seems suitable for a teenager with the mindset of Walter Mitty. ROFLMAO!

my word... well i never, wtf is happening to this thread, its no wonder the company cant get it right, when their shareholders are fighting amongst themselves...lol
Now what was that number...?!

i think you already have mine Ted ..... always open and waiting for you .... lol!

Barclays has reduced their holding from 9% to 6% in EME. Even Barclays is not blind.

Not quite true Hlyeo, holdings before RNS 3,451,822......holdings after RNS 3,435,766.......this constitutes a reduction of 16,056 shares or 0.46% of their holdings........The revised quantity that they are holding in trustee accounts, not theirs, now represents 6.93% of EME shares.

how is your good self, ok i hope... i still hold a few (negligable amount) of these, so just keeping a (watchful) eye on events... if you still have my e-mail address drop me a line, i had to wipe my computer because of a fault, so lost yours...

not sure Ted, but drop me a line through this system and i'll give you my private e-amil address .... have you got VOG still? ..... sp has suddenly acted like Lazarus, but will be happier if/when there is some proper good news to sustain it, rather than (presumably) just hope and expectation.

Having read this thread for the first time - the last now - moronic!

Lazarus will soon be laid down to rest...LOL!

bloody hope not! (lol!!)

News today - testing commenced at Sugarloaf.

No-one following this any more? ;-0

sp action is so dull it's not even worth teasing anyone at the mo!

Hahaha cynic...EME is not much fun now

Nice to see you admit that you have only been taking the piss out of fellow investers......well done

40p level seems to be supported at the moment.

tcdmct .... have always accepted that some may either not like my stance and/or the way i put it ..... that is arguably their loss! ..... with regard to EME and SEO (for example), i hold the companies in pretty low esteem and will write as much .... the underlying opinion will be serious, though the style may be somewhat facetious ..... almost without fail, i try to keep "friends" feet on the ground - e.g. profits do not come from having wonderfully prospective bits of ground to drill.

cynic - Whatever way you do it, you shoot from the hip.

Nothing wrong in that, and it does upset a few who may need to be less sensitive.

tcdmct - you can carry on believing in this company if you want to, each to their own, however the very posters who you seem so opposed to now are the one who predicted this drop in sp and the reasons why it could happen.

In fact Big Al in particular got it spot on before it happened.

You did not take notice of their views and reasons, okay, so what?

Up to you.

Meantime try to chill out a little while continuing to hold these, getting heated up and raising your blood pressure will not put things right.

SWW ... i think that was a backhanded compliment, in which case thanks!

It is the eternal problem with BBs, sww. You're a hero if you call it right and everyone makes money, but try telling folk they're wrong (after a fashion) and all hell breaks loose.

My opinion of threads is that they are there for discussion on whatever subject. As ever there are pros and cons to everything and threads do not solely exist for the bulls of the stock (for example). If people were objective instead of believing they were right about a compnay regardless of the obvious then trouble would be avoided.

Personally, I'll post good and bad on any company. I'm afraid it's tough if that rubs some up the wrong way.


As for EME, it's surprising the news of testing didn't liven up the price much. It would have a few months back.