Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

STERLING ENERGY big buyers about... (SEY)     

proptrade - 14 Jun 2004 11:58

anyone got any ideas about the block trades that went through today?

website: http://www.sterlingenergyplc.com/

graph.php?movingAverageString=%2C50%2C20

weather: www.nhc.noaa.gov/refresh/graphics_at4+shtml/084938.shtml?50wind120

required field - 24 Nov 2010 08:15 - 7641 of 7811

Sp holding up well...so far....

cynic - 24 Nov 2010 08:22 - 7642 of 7811

so it damn well should with rest of market in recovery mode

mnamreh - 24 Nov 2010 08:24 - 7643 of 7811

.

required field - 24 Nov 2010 08:28 - 7644 of 7811

It's a big gamble this....don't put too much on but 2 ways of playing this ....a recovery for the sp on expectations and punters like myself, and the sp climbing back up to perhaps 80 or 90p before results or stay in long term and hope for a nice surprise discovery....

mnamreh - 24 Nov 2010 08:36 - 7645 of 7811

.

rekirkham - 24 Nov 2010 13:13 - 7646 of 7811

I understand that H2S concentrations in Arab Emerates are about 30% ?
If SEY H2S is 5% that is pretty sweet gas I believe.
Am I talking hot air or what ?

cynic - 24 Nov 2010 13:16 - 7647 of 7811

don't know one way or another, but if the story is true, then assuredly SEY are shown to be a bunch of unprofessional nincompoops

rekirkham - 24 Nov 2010 13:25 - 7648 of 7811

Come on now Cynic - do feel so bitter - you will not appear impressive ifSEY come good. Remember Dana on a nearby block are primarily a gas exploration company, so plenty of sweet gas is not so bad.
I know a lot of MoneyAM bloggers will appreciate that, ie. " a lot of gas ".

mnamreh - 24 Nov 2010 13:30 - 7649 of 7811

.

rekirkham - 24 Nov 2010 13:38 - 7650 of 7811

The removal of sulphur from gas and oil is very standard practice in the oil industry.
Are you joking or what ?

Also 5% is a low concentration - have you been in the oil indeustry ?

mnamreh - 24 Nov 2010 13:50 - 7651 of 7811

.

rekirkham - 24 Nov 2010 14:15 - 7652 of 7811

Hi mnamreh - I understand that the H2S is generally left in the oil at the well head and shipped with all the other crap to the refinery. Otherwise it would require quite a lot of equipment at the well head. When the crude oil is shipped by tanker their is the possibility that the H2S will react with the iron of the ship hold and iron pyrites could form. If the iron pyrites meets oxygen from the air, it could ignite, therefore modern ships pump an inert gas ( usually nitrogen ) in the hold on top of the crude oil.

I am not an expert on this part of the oil and gas industry,perhaps many other know better, but I have a little knowledge of it, which is probably dangerous.

Good luck with your dealings = I have masses of SEY and a sore head at the moment.

mnamreh - 24 Nov 2010 14:27 - 7653 of 7811

.

rekirkham - 24 Nov 2010 14:33 - 7654 of 7811

mnamreh - Thank you friend.

cynic - 24 Nov 2010 14:55 - 7655 of 7811

to digress - CO2 is a different matter altogether and is only recently in the headlines due to it being vented to atmosphere and thus adding to greenhouse gases ..... i can tell you quite a lot more on that subject if you/anyone is interested

mnamreh - 24 Nov 2010 15:04 - 7656 of 7811

.

cynic - 24 Nov 2010 15:20 - 7657 of 7811

it's the same field ...... CO2 in oil refining is now being heavily targetted so that they "capture" the CO2 and then bury it in old mine shafts and similar ..... it is also being used at the wellhead to increase pressure in the reservoir and thus recover a larger % of the reserves ..... being totally cynical (moi???), i question the willingness of the oil producers - oh alright, the oil producing countries - to spend the money on this expensive technology, from which they see little return ..... for sure there will be a lot of noise about X's "green credentials" and how they are (willing to) spend(ing) billions (well a few 000 anyway!) to clean up their act etc.

i'm going to a specialist conference next week and there may be (yet another!) presentation on the subject, so I'll try to stay awake for it if there is ..... when i raised the Q last time about who or what countries might be willing to expend all this money for no return, it all seemed to go rather quiet

mnamreh - 24 Nov 2010 15:38 - 7658 of 7811

.

cynic - 24 Nov 2010 16:04 - 7659 of 7811

.

cynic - 24 Nov 2010 16:04 - 7660 of 7811

no idea about carbon trading .... always looks very suspect to me - i.e. a tool for making money rather than reducing emissions and similar

CO2 is almost never transported in solid (dry ice) form ..... indeed, the prime use of CO2 is in food production - e.g. the bubbles in your coca cola or lager - and i cannot believe that CO2 produced in oil refineries can be made remotely suitable for that.

the usual way to move CO2 is either compressed and put in cylinders - only efficient for small quantities - or chilled right down under pressure until it becomes liquid ..... in this form, it is obviously much less bulky than as a gas and is moved in very specialised road barrels or similar ..... to keep the CO2 as liquid means that it has to be moved in a very sophisticated high pressure "thermos flask" - it's actually a double-skinned stainless steel barrel (+/-20/30k litres) with a vacuum between the skins .... in that format it will hold as liquid for about 90 days

perhaps i should have added that if the pressure is allowed to fall, the liquid will become gas once more
Register now or login to post to this thread.