Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

NIGHTHAWK 6 BAGGER ON DEBUT. (HAWK)     

oilyrag - 12 Mar 2007 07:10

Pre IPO price 4p
Opening price on debut 25p
Floatation price 46p to raise 14million to extend Jolly Ranch
Current fair value estimate 114p
Market cap 70.59 million.
Value of Cisco Springs investments 98 million.
Value of Vogel investments 75 million.
Desparado trucking now Nightfox 250,000 for a 50% stake with partner Running Foxes.
Centurion Project Kansas, 150,000 for a 50% stake.
Jolly Ranch Colorado, 40,000 acres cost 356,000 for a 50% stake.
Cash in bank 7.75 million.

As this EPIC opens on AIM today anything could happen. On the one hand you have traders trying to cash in a sixfold profit. You will also have a clambering of traders after shares because, firstly they could only get 75% of their allocation because of demand. Secondly at 25p this company is still way under valued.

gnashlevel2 - 19 Dec 2008 23:17 - 801 of 1373

"but even that is nothing to get THAT excited about"

5000x360*50= $90 Million a year at just $50 oil. The figure is for Hawk & RF combined but full reinvestment will stay until the company is sold.

If oil returns to $70 USD, as I think it will, that's $126 Million.

Even after costs, that's a hell of a lot of income to spend on proving and finalising the projects for a company sale. Scale up yet more pumps and the figures can get astronomical -but they dont need to, haven't you been listening to tactics at the AGM? Quick-sale is the buzzword.

get real, this is a huge play, you are fools if you think otherwise.

halifax - 19 Dec 2008 23:39 - 802 of 1373

Those who believe rampers are the fools!

cynic - 20 Dec 2008 08:36 - 803 of 1373

thanks halifax ......
i actually hold HAWK as i think it may have latched on to a very solid if not spectacular oilfield where extraction would not seem to be too exacting .... that being so, the odds must be quite strongly in its favour that it will be gobbled up in the next year or two.

i also do not believe that oil will stay long at trhe current depressed levels, but then i did not expect it to fall quite this low in the first place ..... however, my gut feeling remains that the "natural" price for oil is in the $80/100 range, and i would expect to see a return to that in say Q3/4 2009.

gnashlevel2 - 20 Dec 2008 09:16 - 804 of 1373

wow cynic, that's very upbeat, time to change your handle? ;-)

cynic - 20 Dec 2008 09:30 - 805 of 1373

cheeky boy! ...... i have always told it the way i see it .... however, as so many on here keep getting overexcited about nothing (you included!), my comments are regularly perceived as predicting gloom and doom rather than just attempting to instil some reality.

you may like to consider what i have just posted on FTSE thread

required field - 05 Jan 2009 12:13 - 806 of 1373

Breakout here, nice rise today...long may it continue !.

gnashlevel2 - 06 Jan 2009 09:18 - 807 of 1373

15-25 dollar profitable... 'appy days!

halifax - 06 Jan 2009 11:17 - 808 of 1373

Hawk might breakeven this year if the price of oil holds around $50 as long as production can be ramped up from 1000 bopd.

required field - 12 Jan 2009 12:16 - 809 of 1373

Share price just can't seem to pull away from the lower thirties at the moment.....at a guess if we could get past 40p, this might climb very fast all of a sudden !.

gnashlevel2 - 24 Jan 2009 20:46 - 810 of 1373

'co-mingling' being discussed a bit on other boards, potentially 16 production zones per well head over 4 producer-zone areas. That made me sit up and take notice. Best gets better

cynic - 25 Jan 2009 09:48 - 811 of 1373

HAWK was always set up, or so i am led to believe, with a view to it being groomed for take-over ...... so far so good for its drillings have almost never drawn blanks ..... however, investor sentiment only perceives a low underlying crude price and HAWK having only pretty small proven reservoirs and flows.

on the other hand, it is cheaper for a predator to take out a company with known reserves etc than to risk drilling new sites with its attendant significant costs.

so the jury is out for HAWK (which i hold), whereas, i would have thought that both TLW and HOIL (i hold both) make much more tempting targets, given the two recent massive finds they have made.

robertalexander - 04 Feb 2009 08:12 - 812 of 1373

hawk down 10% any news out there as to why. appreciate not necessary any news to make it go up either?

cynic - 04 Feb 2009 08:33 - 813 of 1373

probably just a reflection of continuing weakness in crude and nymex in particular

capetown - 04 Feb 2009 09:10 - 814 of 1373

Looking at the chart on this one its just as crappy as amer and goo as you would say Cynic.,(The chart that is)

cynic - 04 Feb 2009 09:19 - 815 of 1373

at least these guys actually have balck stuff even if it is only in very modest amounts

capetown - 04 Feb 2009 09:23 - 816 of 1373

CYNIC,i was talking about the chart,and even you must agree it looks just as crap,as you would say?

cynic - 04 Feb 2009 10:56 - 817 of 1373

sp is now looking very nasty .... down virtually 15%
no news out, but that sort of fall is rarely without reason

massive volume too ..... could be a forced sale i suppose, but would be nervous to top up without having any knowledge surrounding this

halifax - 04 Feb 2009 11:51 - 818 of 1373

SER is producing 4k barrels of oil per month Hawk is producing very little yet HAWK's market cap is over 10 times that of SER. Perhaps HAWK has greater potential but that remains to be seen.

cynic - 04 Feb 2009 12:42 - 819 of 1373

i have bravely (damn stupidly more like) just bought a further 33% at 24p

halifax - 04 Feb 2009 12:45 - 820 of 1373

cynic didn't think you believed in averaging down as a good stategy.
Register now or login to post to this thread.