Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • ...
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Bank of England squeeze supply of 5's in desperate attempt to hold down inflation numbers (DLAR)     

tobyboy - 26 Jun 2007 11:33

dlar print the stuff,they should know

midknight - 14 May 2012 11:25 - 81 of 99

Not expecting much movement before prelims on 29th.
As long as it remains above 870 until then should be OK
for a while depending on results.

mnamreh - 14 May 2012 11:34 - 82 of 99

.

midknight - 14 May 2012 13:12 - 83 of 99

Drachmatisation should indeed help. Perhaps that is
what is sustaining the relatively high price vis-a-vis
the rest of the volatile market! Even otherwise, the yield
has been consistently attractive for some time now and
one of the best around.

mnamreh - 14 May 2012 13:15 - 84 of 99

.

midknight - 14 May 2012 13:18 - 85 of 99

995 now and rising...1000 can't be far away, intraday anyway.

mnamreh - 14 May 2012 13:19 - 86 of 99

.

midknight - 14 May 2012 13:20 - 87 of 99

More credit and debt, old boy. That's how.

midknight - 14 May 2012 13:23 - 88 of 99

I think 1000 is on the cards today, perhaps after Wall St opens
or even before..

mnamreh - 14 May 2012 14:39 - 89 of 99

.

mnamreh - 14 May 2012 14:47 - 90 of 99

.

midknight - 14 May 2012 15:04 - 91 of 99

1022-1025 has been a resistance point previously when
it went past 1000. Tempted tp sell some more. On the other hand...

mnamreh - 14 May 2012 15:11 - 92 of 99

.

midknight - 14 May 2012 15:37 - 93 of 99

52-week high and still rising.Hmm...

mnamreh - 14 May 2012 16:36 - 94 of 99

.

midknight - 14 May 2012 16:38 - 95 of 99

Positive UT trades a good omen.

mnamreh - 15 May 2012 09:34 - 96 of 99

.

midknight - 15 May 2012 09:57 - 97 of 99

Seems to be following previous pattern of retreating
after hitting 1024/25 mentioned yesterday.

Skinny, come on, do us a small favour with the chart,
never mind the sexy banknotes!

skinny - 15 May 2012 11:00 - 98 of 99

midknight - I've asked Ian if he can put a chart in the header - of us mere mortals, only the thread/post originator can edit it.

hlyeo98 - 29 Nov 2012 10:55 - 99 of 99

Did Carney really save Canada?

The truth is, there are three good reasons why Canada was not hit so hard in 2008, and was among the first countries to recover. First, it’s the only one of the G7 countries to have run a budget surplus for the last 14 years. (One reason for which incidentally, is that with the US next door, it spends very little on its military). So it was in a stronger position going into the crisis.

Secondly, Canada is extremely rich in natural resources – oil, gas, metal and grain, the prices of which (except gas) recovered very quickly post-2008.

Third, Canada’s banks were not so geared. Part of the reason for this may lie with Canada’s more risk-averse regulatory system, which Carney oversaw during his time at the Bank of Canada. Others would argue that Canada’s banks were simply too late to the securitisation party, and so were able to dodge a bullet.

Of those three reasons, Carney can only really take any credit for the last. Yet as a result of his slashed interest rates, the banking system may not be such a paragon for much longer. Carney leaves behind him high house prices in both Toronto and Vancouver, where, not unlike London, locals complain that housing has become unaffordable to them. Are they bubbles that are set to burst? We'll see. Carney might be leaving Canada behind just in time. We shall find out.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • ...
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Register now or login to post to this thread.