wahidfaez
- 09 Oct 2008 12:16
does tanfield have 2 good businesses ( smith electrics and upright)which are good value for the medium to long term hold ?
supermum
- 30 Mar 2009 08:38
- 101 of 392
I hold a few of these, so watching keenly! the thought of a tea break in the F1 ... bring back the good old days LOL
kimoldfield
- 30 Mar 2009 09:06
- 102 of 392
A tea break followed by a sprint to the cars, yes that would be good SM!
Balerboy
- 30 Mar 2009 09:14
- 103 of 392
Heading south,
almoore
- 30 Mar 2009 09:25
- 104 of 392
ftse down 100 pts - gm motors in trouble in usa - Dont miss the oppourtunity to fill your boots with tan at less than 12p
imho
2517GEORGE
- 30 Mar 2009 10:02
- 105 of 392
A newswire stating that Detroit Electric is to produce and market a full line of innovative Pure Electric vehicles in US, UK, EU and China beginning 2010, Proton is their partner, may have dampened TAN from it's earlier highs.
2517
almoore
- 30 Mar 2009 10:43
- 106 of 392
george
mt glass on advfn site says detroit electric has links with proton the malaysian car maker (gas guzzler type) - no connection with proton power.
2517GEORGE
- 30 Mar 2009 11:16
- 107 of 392
almoore----yes that's right, by 2012 the jv plan on selling 270,000 vehicles, looks like 2 types one capable of a range of 111 miles and costing 23,000- 26,000 usd, and the other with a range of 200 miles costing 28,000 - 33,000usd.
2517
kimoldfield
- 30 Mar 2009 11:27
- 108 of 392
More power to the drive for ev's, (pun intended!)
almoore
- 30 Mar 2009 11:34
- 109 of 392
george
but they should not affect tanfield - detoit/proton malaysia will be making electric cars in 2/3 years. Tanfield make electric vehicles ie trucks/vans etc available NOW !.
2517GEORGE
- 30 Mar 2009 12:15
- 110 of 392
almoore----your assumption is absolutely right, TAN's bias is towards trucks/vans as opposed to the jv of detroit/proton with their cars. I was merely suggesting that the reason for TAN's sp pullback this morning may have been due to the announcement.
2517
oilyrag
- 30 Mar 2009 12:41
- 111 of 392
The bid has constantly been moved to capture AT trades. I'm holding in the belief of a substancial rise sooner rather than later, as I believe these are being collected by mm's to fill a large order. AIMHO, DYOR.
almoore
- 30 Mar 2009 12:53
- 112 of 392
george
ok fair comment, but Tan are not biased towards trucks/vans - they simply don't sell cars. Lets not forget the hoist (cherry picker) side of their business which is larger than the ev side.
Balerboy
- 30 Mar 2009 22:04
- 113 of 392
And so the hype went on..... and on. SEO was hyped in just the same way, until Walmart pulled the rug out and left us picking up the pieces. I'll wait till the contract is signed an dthe deal done. 2012 is a long time holding on to nothing.
banjomick
- 30 Mar 2009 22:32
- 114 of 392
Hype? This thread looks pretty un-hyped on the whole.The SP more or less held-up from previous gains and a nice bit of trading volume t'boot.
kimoldfield
- 31 Mar 2009 01:23
- 115 of 392
I agree Balerboy, 2012 is a long time to wait, but TAN's prospects in today's climate have to be so much better than they were this time last year. Ford will be putting a lot of their own cash (if they have any left !) into ev's and SEV-US will be one of the main beneficiaries.
http://www.allcarselectric.com/blog/1019758_ford-commits-additional-funding-to-evs-downplays-fuel-cell-technology
Also, although Bryan Hansel, SEV-US CEO, has not commented on orders already received, I cannot see Ford and Smith taking a gamble on introducing a proven technology to the US without having firm evidence that production of the Smith Newton over there will be successful. The quotes are that "SEV-US will produce its first trucks (note the plural) in the third quarter of 2009"; quite a claim since that is only 6 months from now and the factory is not yet ready. Sounds like all stops out and full steam ahead to me. Oh, except that they will be electric not steam!
You are quite right to wait. Don't take your eye off TAN though!
http://thebatterytimes.com/2009/03/30/worlds-largest-battery-powered-truck-comes-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-259
There are now over 300 different versions of the story which have appeared since Friday.
Balerboy
- 31 Mar 2009 08:51
- 116 of 392
Hope you boy's took your profits when you could cause this is going down till the next snippet of news.
kimoldfield
- 31 Mar 2009 09:03
- 117 of 392
I have traded TAN many times over the past 12 months and done very nicely out of it but this time I will hold long term. The next 'news' will probably be the results, it is anybody's guess what they will be like. When news of orders comes through I don't want to be in a position where I would wish I had not sold any of my holding: if things go pear shaped then obviously I will regret it!
Balerboy
- 31 Mar 2009 09:10
- 118 of 392
If GM and Chrysler are stuggling I reckon Ford are going to be slow and cautious.
Your bottom line is sooo SEO, is your old name E.W.Robson by any chance?? lol
kimoldfield
- 31 Mar 2009 09:19
- 119 of 392
Lol! No :o)
Fred1new
- 31 Mar 2009 17:38
- 120 of 392
Tan, will wobble for a few months while GM looks at its books and slashes executive perks and bonuses. Before being bailed out.
I can't see Obam, allowing them to go to the wall.