goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
skinny
- 09 Dec 2011 12:13
- 13762 of 81564
Its quite a useful site - and unlike others offering similar, it is updated fairly quickly as news is released.
greekman
- 09 Dec 2011 14:04
- 13763 of 81564
Finally the truth is out, the EU will have a new club to which the UK will not be a member.
So we now have a very clear choice, we either,
1 Stay in the old club, sitting on our own in the darkest, furthermost back room sitting at the bar, alone like the old man mopping into his pint.
2 We resign our membership.
Benefits of choice 1.
None.
Benefits of choice 2.
Immediate benefit of cost, as the UK is a net contributor to the EU.
Return to our own employment, immigration, health and safety, agricultural, fisheries law and most important of all Human Rights (tried up with immigration of course).
There are no doubt many more benefits that others may see, but the above is just a taster.
Surely the UK must now hold a referendum.
THERE IS NO OTHER CHOICE!
Haystack
- 09 Dec 2011 14:22
- 13764 of 81564
We won't be on our own. There are other countries in the EU and NOT in the Eurozone.
greekman
- 09 Dec 2011 14:30
- 13765 of 81564
Ed Miliband has just been speaking on the BBC, re the EU and Cameron.
He stated that he feels that Cameron has done a bad deal as 'He has walked away'
Cameron had 2 choices, either use the veto or not, negotiating further was obviously not an option.
When pushed about what he would have done, Miliband just reiterated the above, He did not attempt to say what he would have done differently.
He's far more useless than Cameron.
aldwickk
- 09 Dec 2011 14:37
- 13766 of 81564
greekman
- 09 Dec 2011 15:15
- 13769 of 81564
Hi Aldwickk,
Read it this morning in the Telegraph.
Although absolutely disgusted by it, I was not surprised.
If the facts are as reported, the Police were obviously negligent.
I just hope the Builder takes the Police Authority to court to try and recoup any losses.
Dil
- 09 Dec 2011 15:22
- 13770 of 81564
What's the point of this new agreement when no one has ever stuck to any of the previous ones if they didn't want to ?
EUR still gonna fall apart at some point imo.
TANKER
- 09 Dec 2011 15:22
- 13771 of 81564
just given my pint of blood ,feel much better after i have donated
skinny
- 09 Dec 2011 15:27
- 13772 of 81564
You don't seriously expect me to believe that. I mean, I came in here in all good faith to help my country. I don't mind giving a reasonable amount, but a pint . . . why that's very nearly an armful. I'm sorry. I'm not walking around with an empty arm for anybody . . . No, I'm sorry, I've been misinformed, I've made a mistake . . . I'll do something else, I'll be a traffic warden.
mnamreh
- 09 Dec 2011 15:28
- 13773 of 81564
.
Haystack
- 09 Dec 2011 15:39
- 13774 of 81564
The new Euro rules will
1. Will control the percentage of structural budget deficit (0.5%) against GDP
2. Will have automatic sanctions for any eurozone country whose deficit exceeds 3% of GDP
3. Will have a requirement to submit their national budgets to the European Commission, which will have the power to request that they be revised
What will happen is that countries such as Greece, Italy,Spain and Portugal will lie about the figures as they did to get entry to the Euro.
Dil
- 09 Dec 2011 15:46
- 13775 of 81564
Errrrr haven't they already got rules covering most of that Haystack ???
Dil
- 09 Dec 2011 15:49
- 13776 of 81564
From October 2003
"The excessive-deficit procedure already exists in European law and is being put into the constitution, with minor modifications. This is a very peculiar state of affairs. No less an authority than Romano Prodi, the head of the European Commission, has called the current rules stupid. The governments of France, Germany and Britain have all made it clear that they think they should be made more flexible. The whole thing has been falling apart anyway, as France and Germany have repeatedly breached the 3% limit. The drafting of a new constitution would have provided an ideal opportunity to change the rules and make them more realistic. Instead, the entire cumbersome procedure is being set in the stone of constitutional law."
Dil
- 09 Dec 2011 15:52
- 13777 of 81564
Or try a search on growth and stability pact .... today's deal is the same old crap rebranded.
greekman
- 09 Dec 2011 16:08
- 13778 of 81564
The new rules,
1. Will control the percentage of structural budget deficit (0.5%) against GDP
2. Will have automatic sanctions for any euro zone country whose deficit exceeds 3% of GDP.
OK so when countries exceed their budget deficit, they will be fined.
Well I'm sure thats going to work.
I just can't believe that the UK are the only country sensible enough not to sign up to the new deal.
Mind you the other 26 countries have got to get this past their electorate yet. No bloody chance!
I would far sooner the UK be on the outside when the EU implodes, than on the inside.
mnamreh
- 09 Dec 2011 16:15
- 13779 of 81564
.
greekman
- 09 Dec 2011 16:37
- 13780 of 81564
Mnamreh,
I never thought of that.
A bit slower than the 'Blitzkrieg' but just as effective.
Remember Churchill's famous saying, 'Never in the field of humanity has so much s**te been thrown by so many at so few'.