Rutherford
- 30 Mar 2004 20:18
www.blackrockoilandgasplc.co.uk
www.vsaresources.com
www.oilbarrel.com
Presentation from Thursday 6th July 06 can be seen on oilbarrel !
Monterey appraisal well suspended pending Wintershall evaluation. 1/12/06
BLR and Kappa in dispute.
BLR to meet with Kappa within next two weeks 1/12/06
diydave
- 10 Apr 2006 16:47
- 229 of 1049
Sorry, nothing official, soul. I'm reiterating a resume of a conversation a big(ish) player and long term trusted poster claimed to have had with the company. He wasn't ramping but was certainly out to reassure.
This funding issue has been extensively debated and analysed over on ADVFN.
moneyman
- 18 Apr 2006 17:09
- 232 of 1049
Positive result following the placing. Will be good to get some confirmed news from Colombia on progress which will really ignite the share price.
soul traders
- 18 Apr 2006 19:29
- 233 of 1049
Good to see that the directors purchased stock in the placing as well. Here's the full text of today's RNS:
>> Black Rock Oil - Placing
RNS Number:5748B
Black Rock Oil & Gas PLC
18 April 2006
For immediate release 18 April 2006
Black Rock Oil & Gas PLC
('Black Rock' or the 'Company')
Placing to raise 1,312,614
Black Rock (stock code: BLR), the UK-based exploration company, announces that
it has placed with institutional and other investors 131,261,415 new ordinary
shares of 0.5p each ('Ordinary Shares') at a placing price of 1p per Ordinary
Share (the 'Placing'). The new money being raised of 1,312,614 (before
expenses) will be used to fund the Company's operations in Colombia. The
Directors have also participated in the Placing at the Placing Price as set out
below, together with their resultant shareholdings in the Company:
Director Ordinary Shares Resultant Interest in
subscribed for shareholding the Company
in the Placing
Tony Baldry 1,000,000 1,000,000 0.18 per cent.
Interests associated 1,000,000 19,484,243 3.48 per cent.
with Ivan Burgess*
John Cubitt 1,000,000 1,000,000 0.18 per cent.
Peter Hughes 500,000 500,000 0.09 per cent.
* Comprises 544,171 Ordinary Shares subscribed for by Ivan Burgess' pension fund
and a further 455,829 Ordinary Shares subscribed for by Mrs Ivan Burgess, the
wife of Ivan Burgess.
The new Ordinary Shares will rank pari passu with the existing Ordinary Shares
in issue. Application has been made for the new Ordinary Shares to be admitted
to trading on AIM, which is expected to commence on 21 April 2006. Following the
Placing, Black Rock will have a total issued share capital of 560,198,815
Ordinary Shares admitted to trading on AIM.
Ivan Burgess, Managing Director of Black Rock Oil & Gas plc, commented:
'The funds raised will allow us to commence our development programme in
Colombia. As already indicated, the plan is to steam flood the Arce Oil Field
with the objective of generating early cash flow.
'Black Rock and our local partner, Kappa, anticipate that the Arce 4 development
well will spud in late April/early May 2006. It is expected that this well will
come on stream later this year. Further updates will be provided as material
information becomes available.
'We have deliberately chosen highly prospective acreage and in Kappa we have a
very experienced partner with an impressive track record. We believe that the
outlook for the Company has never been more positive.' <<
cynic
- 21 Apr 2006 20:11
- 235 of 1049
Confess I cannot get get excited about BLR as it specialises in heavy oils which are unsexy to say the least, and for good reason ..... in a nutshell, though one may find large resreves of same, it is very difficult to extract economically and effectively, thus leaving a good % in the ground .... also heavy oil sells at a significant discount to light.
soul traders
- 22 Apr 2006 15:14
- 236 of 1049
Cynic, there are some light oil exploration and also gas development plays in BLR's portfolio. Regarding the heavy oil, BLR is implementing steam-flooding, common in Colombia, and seems to have a fair shot at making its wells productive. Also the fact that heavy oil sells at a discount to light does not mean it is unprofitable. The company's house broker reckoned on cashflow of $25 per barrel of heavy crude from the Arce field, and that was at last October's oil prices. At the current low market cap, given the scope of the E&P portfolio I think BLR is cheap enough to warrant a punt, and any significant production success will have a marked effect on the SP.
I'd agree that the stock is not for widows or orphans, but I side with Peter Lynch over issues of sexiness. The big question is whether one is happy with taking on a fair amount of risk, but I think that a lot of the risk with BLR is a matter of perception. I'm prepared to invest in this as being one of the potential big surprises of the next 18 months, but that's just my opinion and anyone who's DYOR'd and come to a different conclusion is entitled to their view.
cynic
- 22 Apr 2006 16:57
- 237 of 1049
you and i will choose to disagree then ... no hard feelings ..... any investment, particularly in commodity based stocks is taking an above average risk ..... I happen to think there are a lot better than BLR .... e.g. BUR or EME or VOG or MRP or even arguably CHP if you want to stick with oil/gas stocks
Dr Square
- 22 Apr 2006 18:26
- 238 of 1049
cynic
Have to disagree. The risk rewards on BLR compared to EME seem weighted towards BLR as Eagle is about p50 in the price now of EME and has not produced. where as Arce has. Baul & especially Monterey are company makers for BLR the latter would be on line much quicker than Glantel ever will. Not to mention the acreage differences as comparson. I hold both companys. Each to thier own mind.
regards and good luck on EME next week
cynic
- 22 Apr 2006 18:59
- 240 of 1049
SEY is actually too small for me trade in in CFDs ....as i mentioned, it just makes me cross when peeps make wild statemetns without any apparent logic .... to be honest, i don't know enough about BLR and a couple of other heavy oil prospectors that i have come acroos with interesting sites; i reckon i have more than enough (and IMO, better) exposure in the stocks i have mentioned in an earlier post.
soul traders
- 22 Apr 2006 19:04
- 241 of 1049
I see; CFD's aren't part of my plan so it's not an issue. Naturally there is a lot of speculation and wishful thinking on these BB's - it's only the deliberate denigration of other posters that gets me down though. However, when it comes to SER I think the fact that the whole tone of the debate centres around speculation and what the chart is doing is enough to put me off.
For a good coffee-time read about BLR, check out their house broker's report at
http://www.blackrockoil.com/investor/broker/041005_whireland.pdf
Dr Square
- 22 Apr 2006 19:49
- 242 of 1049
soul traders
As a knowledgeble chap you might give me your views on the recent placeings Value 1.9 Million.
I have read the AGM presentation 19th December and looked at the Pie chart on expenditure for 2006. Monterey is shown as expenditure of 18% of 3 million. I have to say some of the splits on the pie chart seem rather cheap for the work to be undertaken.
The question is quite simple has the money been raised for Monterey? Many across the road think not, I am an optimist so think it has. What are you views?
Regards
moneyman
- 25 Apr 2006 09:10
- 243 of 1049
Very positive to see Institutions now buying in.
skyhigh
- 25 Apr 2006 10:12
- 244 of 1049
Which means they don't see this getting any lower and from here on ....it's upwards right ? :)
moneyman
- 25 Apr 2006 10:26
- 245 of 1049
I would hope so Sky. House broker has moved onto the bid now.
moneyman
- 25 Apr 2006 11:40
- 246 of 1049
Oil Juniors is in the Hargreaves Lansdown Fortune 150. Here is what they say;
This fund is not for the feint hearted as it invests in S and M oil companies. Currently there are just 28 holdings in the fund. The Manager considers many holdings to be potential takeover targets for larger firms which are struggling to replenish oil reserves. This is a higher risk sector for experienced investors, though the rewards could be exciting ;-)
Fund Manager comment;
With Oil and Gas prices remaining high, the fundamentals for companies involved in exploration and production continue to improve.
skyhigh
- 25 Apr 2006 12:06
- 247 of 1049
Moneyman...thanks for the info.. as said BLR is highly speculative...but with institutions buying in it's a good sign...we should be alot higher in 6/9 mnths time (inho)
moneyman
- 25 Apr 2006 12:15
- 248 of 1049
http://www.trustnet.co.uk/ut/funds/?fund=5364